Mr_Monkey: lol! I was about to reply abut how I've tested them (got email about updated tickets :D) but the order was not very good and "did you put them in my suggested order" like (I tried putting them in a logical order & hierarchy using "parent" and "child" ids )
Mr_Monkey
Yep ! I'm just finishing this up after some struggling. It's working well for the order, but I haven't found a good way to show hierarchy yet (like indentation)
CatQuest
hm
well maybe look at mb code? (it's in there atleast)
thoguh maybe it's not apliable with the differnt languages
Mr_Monkey
CatQuest: Any preference between these two options for representing the hierarchy?
I found a more elegant way with margins only, so let's do that.
OK, that's deployed on test.bb; Have a look when you find some time please :)
CatQuest
i'll test now!
trstt data is totally bogus and its fine to break stuuf right?
Mr_Monkey: 👏 this looks great imho!
(even the turned around "this is about" one (because it seems more logicla to me))
here is one thing though: I don't really like the way ordering is handeld (for things work work(or any two same entity rel:)) that there is aduplication in the list so that "$work1 is an adaption of $work2" but also there is "$work2 was adapted into $work1"
the reasons for disliking this: it is really unclear what if they are named the same. 2 it actually makes it harder to fidn the right type rel because there is no indication where the "other way around" ones start - a "reverse order" button liek in mb would be much clearer. imho
ah I see in the new list updated on test it is either or ah..
idk if i thikn that's an improvmenet or not. in some ways it is in other ways it's worse? :D
maybe having two differnt dropdowns woudl be better?
eg
eh i dunno
this new update way works fine with eh two differnt named works. but adaptations often have the same name you know :)
also: https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/BB-538 (granted this is a logical reacting, but it's easy to accidentally do this and it should atleast give a warning and not silently(invisibly) remve a prior link)
also it's the the wrong link looks like it's getting removed. weird
hm the more i think aobut it. i liek more that it's collected thna separate in the list (rels)