the Number.prototype.toLocaleString stuff should resolve MBS-4118, though I'm certain we don't use it everywhere we should and it needs to be tested in more languages to be sure
the vote reports thing seems like a nice idea. why don't you think unreviewed edits should be marked as such more visibly in the listings? (just curious)
2019-07-16 19750, 2019
bitmap
re: speeding up the applied edit count predicate, an index on (editor, status) might help there but would need to test, perhaps on queen
2019-07-16 19754, 2019
ferbncode
spellew: thanks! I'll take a look :)
2019-07-16 19719, 2019
yvanzo
mo’’in’
2019-07-16 19703, 2019
Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
2019-07-16 19706, 2019
D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
2019-07-16 19737, 2019
Darkloke joined the channel
2019-07-16 19713, 2019
ruaok
reosarevok: on MBS-4219 -- not yet, but maybe early next year?
bitmap: I don't necessarily think it should not be marked, but on the other hand, given we still don't even show the vote tally in the listings (just "My vote: None"), that's quite a jump. Maybe showing the tally as 0 Yes 0 No would be enough?
2019-07-16 19700, 2019
reosarevok
I guess if we do that we can also add like a special border or something to "0 Yes 0 No" :)
2019-07-16 19711, 2019
nawcom has quit
2019-07-16 19719, 2019
nawcom joined the channel
2019-07-16 19752, 2019
Gazooo joined the channel
2019-07-16 19757, 2019
CatQuest joined the channel
2019-07-16 19757, 2019
CatQuest has quit
2019-07-16 19757, 2019
CatQuest joined the channel
2019-07-16 19718, 2019
zas
ruaok, bitmap, yvanzo, iliekcomputers: pink is ready (meant to replace queen), I still have few minor things to fix, but the system is ready, docker is installed, monitoring is working (I still have to figure out how to collect data from adaptec hardware raid). It required many small changes since hardware isn't exactly the same (mainly network interfaces and hardware raid).
2019-07-16 19732, 2019
zas
please test if you can log in
2019-07-16 19705, 2019
zas
bitmap: you can start configuring it to replace queen (that should be removed before we can order bowie's replacement)
2019-07-16 19732, 2019
zas
when floyd (new bowie) will be plugged in: I'll set it up, then we switch to pink as main database server, move stuff from bowie to floyd, when done, we toggle floyd becomes master again
2019-07-16 19706, 2019
ruaok
confirmed. I logged in and can sudo.
2019-07-16 19733, 2019
zas
:)
2019-07-16 19710, 2019
CatQuest
but can you log in and do judo? 🤔
2019-07-16 19731, 2019
CatQuest
"(meant to replace queen),"
2019-07-16 19731, 2019
CatQuest
whaaaaaat? nooooo
2019-07-16 19700, 2019
CatQuest
ಠ_ಠ it's going ot b one of those days isn't it -__-
2019-07-16 19759, 2019
Freso
CatQuest: queen and bowie are being replaced due to needed hardware upgrades. Being replaced by pink and floyd respectively.
2019-07-16 19706, 2019
zas
Freso: I upgraded discourse
2019-07-16 19721, 2019
leeijaw has quit
2019-07-16 19746, 2019
D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
2019-07-16 19747, 2019
ruaok
alastairp: ping
2019-07-16 19701, 2019
iliekcomputers
I love New servers
2019-07-16 19709, 2019
iliekcomputers
Mostly because of new server names
2019-07-16 19725, 2019
iliekcomputers
pink.metabrainz <3
2019-07-16 19727, 2019
alastairp
ruaok: hi
2019-07-16 19733, 2019
alastairp
how long do you need?
2019-07-16 19755, 2019
ruaok
maybe 10-15 minutes?
2019-07-16 19706, 2019
alastairp
perfect, let's do it
2019-07-16 19709, 2019
ruaok
I think I may have sorted my question now, but a headcheck would still be good.
2019-07-16 19714, 2019
ruaok
ok.
2019-07-16 19750, 2019
ruaok
as you might recall, I run a query on the MB data to fetch tracks that have release type album and insert that into the MSB DB.
2019-07-16 19714, 2019
ruaok
then I parallel walk both that table and the MSB recordings in sorted order to find matches.
2019-07-16 19728, 2019
ruaok
that part is working nicely and artist clusters are being voted on. all good.
2019-07-16 19703, 2019
ruaok
my concern now is to pick matches against recordings so that all MSB recordings with the same text end up on the same MB release.
2019-07-16 19705, 2019
yvanzo
zas: Offending key for IP in .ssh/known_hosts (line matches bootsie)
2019-07-16 19719, 2019
ruaok
yvanzo: delete the old one. they re-used the IP.
2019-07-16 19753, 2019
ruaok
alastairp: because I want to avoid scattering MSB recordings across disparate releases for a given artist.
2019-07-16 19721, 2019
ruaok
so, my current thinking is to find the first released release for each release group and match against that if the MSB recording does not specify a releae.
2019-07-16 19711, 2019
alastairp
from MusicBrainz you get only a list of recordings, no release names?
2019-07-16 19712, 2019
ruaok
the thinking is that people who want to listen to other people's listens would most likely want to listen to the album release recording as the first release.
2019-07-16 19742, 2019
ruaok
I'm working now to get release names, in part to ensure that MSB recordings get clustered on one release and not across a pile of them.
2019-07-16 19754, 2019
ruaok
my previous approach did not involve release names at all.
2019-07-16 19717, 2019
ruaok
and that approach matched recordings in a willy nilly manner that doesn't make for nice data clusters.
2019-07-16 19724, 2019
ruaok
(or a nice user experience)
2019-07-16 19755, 2019
alastairp
> 12:31 PM <ruaok> my concern now is to pick matches against recordings so that all MSB recordings with the same text end up on the same MB release.
2019-07-16 19715, 2019
alastairp
is this messybrainz recordings without a release name provided, or those ones too?
2019-07-16 19725, 2019
ruaok
without.
2019-07-16 19750, 2019
ruaok
next I will need to consider ones that have releases provided.
2019-07-16 19755, 2019
alastairp
right, sure
2019-07-16 19719, 2019
ruaok
but I find that taking small steps is making the whole thing manageable in my head. otherwise it quickly gets out of head and out of hand.
2019-07-16 19728, 2019
ruaok
does that approach make sense?
2019-07-16 19735, 2019
alastairp
do you want to use context to help here? e.g. user a listens to track 1, 2, 3 in order, find where they appear in a release?
2019-07-16 19741, 2019
alastairp
I suspect that's a pretty complex process though
2019-07-16 19754, 2019
alastairp
oh, drat. I guess messybrainz doesn't have temporal info :(
2019-07-16 19725, 2019
alastairp
but yes, getting the first release that a track appears on is a good safe start
2019-07-16 19730, 2019
alastairp
it's what I would do
2019-07-16 19749, 2019
yvanzo
ruaok: thanks
2019-07-16 19701, 2019
yvanzo
zas: confirmed too (login and sudo)
2019-07-16 19716, 2019
ruaok
alastairp: yeah, MSB is a very strange slice of data to work with.
2019-07-16 19734, 2019
ruaok
we did a great piece of handwaving back then in london. :)
2019-07-16 19745, 2019
ruaok
ok, then I will work towards that and see what I get out of it.
2019-07-16 19756, 2019
alastairp
"let's do something and hope that it's useful for us"
2019-07-16 19720, 2019
ruaok
I suspect that this first pass is going to match a lot of data. once I am happy with that, I can look at other data and find candidates for merging into the clusters that have been found already.
