Everything there is dockerized. We only need to test it once if it's all working together in conjunction
ruaok
great.
so when that last PR is merged, then setup the live replication stuff and monitor it.
once that seems to be behaving, point beta.mb.org to it.
samj1912
Yes
Cool
ruaok
then we'll write a blog post about a call to test.
samj1912
Uhuh
drsaunde joined the channel
ruaok
we'll get a flood of bugs, for sure.
we'll have to be careful to curate them about parity and new features.
I don't want to go down the rabbit hole of new features right now.
agentsim has quit
samj1912
I think we have reached parity
ruaok
think being the operative keyword. :)
we probably missed something, but that is expected.
and if not, bonus!
then once we go live with the setup, you should take some time to work on picard.
samj1912
I went through search server source code, but yes, testing will be nice, we can also get a measure of how well solr performs under load
ruaok
but, the primary focus is search still. If bugs in the setup appear, that is top priority.
samj1912
Okay
ruaok
thank you again for getting a handle on all of this. I feel uplifted now. :)
reosarevok
⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️
samj1912
🙌
ruaok
alastairp: ping
iliekcomputers: I'm going to nuke the alpha-importer bits. should be pretty easy.
samj1912
Meanwhile, I wanted to have a discussion with you and bitmap about the existing search server schema
It's not really all that comprehensive
ruaok
what do you mean by that?
samj1912
Lots of things are missing or inconsistent as me and bitmap figured out. We fixed or not added whatever we found
Well for example the search server indexes only url artist rels
Nothing else
It had different relationships outputs depending on which type of relationship it was (missing attributes and so on)
And has a slightly different output than WS2
iliekcomputers
ruaok: I have it done almost, I'll send the PR in a half hour or so.
ruaok
this is present in the old search server code and now also present in the SOLR stuff?
iliekcomputers: ahhh, ok. thanks. <3
samj1912
Present in old server yes
Solr too (although I took bitmap 's advice to remove or add stuff which made sense)
But yes, solr is close current search server than WS2 in output
Since I coded it entirely replicating the search server Java source code
ruaok
oy, this is tricky stuff.
yes, lets chat about this with bitmap.
samj1912
Yes
reosarevok
It would make sense to add as much as we can that won't break other people's setup (like the rest of the URLs) but there might be stuff we can't fix :(
reosarevok is still amazed only artist URLs were implemented
agentsim joined the channel
ruaok
and that no one ever noticed. :)
reosarevok
Yeah, I though that's what the discogs importer for example used to try to match discogs labels and places and releases, but I guess not
samj1912: How is that link not a proper link to the backlog?
samj1912
Freso it does not scroll to the correct place. You have to find the correct message.
Freso
samj1912: Did for me. 🤷🏼
samj1912
Firefox? :p
Freso
yes.
samj1912
Chrome problems then :p
For me it scrolls to an arbitrary message later that day
I have to scroll up to find it
Even worse is going up through the backlog normally. It will load the backlog and then scroll me down to the bottom.
Freso
bitmap, Leftmost (and maybe chhavi_, samj1912, iliekcomputers, ferbncode-who's-not-around): Europe switched DST off last night, so tonight's meeting (and coming meetings) will be at 18:00 UTC rather than 17:00 UTC. AFAIK, the US doesn't switch until next weekend(?), and no clue about India. :x