3:03 AM
pronik` joined the channel
2010-11-01 30506, 2010
4:50 AM
dinog joined the channel
2010-11-01 30505, 2010
6:54 AM
pronik`` joined the channel
2010-11-01 30522, 2010
8:24 AM
pronik``` joined the channel
2010-11-01 30540, 2010
9:36 AM
zazi joined the channel
2010-11-01 30528, 2010
10:05 AM
zazi joined the channel
2010-11-01 30536, 2010
10:22 AM
djce joined the channel
2010-11-01 30532, 2010
11:24 AM
nikki
what happens when someone asks for their account to be deleted? do we just rename it, or do we do stuff like delete their subscriptions as well?
2010-11-01 30519, 2010
11:57 AM
zazi_ joined the channel
2010-11-01 30535, 2010
13:07 PM
warp
nikki: I'm not sure. ruaok does that sort of thing.
2010-11-01 30538, 2010
13:07 PM
warp
also
2010-11-01 30539, 2010
13:07 PM
warp
hello!
2010-11-01 30542, 2010
13:07 PM
nikki
moin moin!
2010-11-01 30521, 2010
14:47 PM
djce
nikki: I think in the past we've said: you clear out as much data as you can, including deleting your subs and stuff; we'll remove your email address, zap the password, and rename the account to something like "deleted-123456".
2010-11-01 30525, 2010
14:47 PM
djce
something like that.
2010-11-01 30508, 2010
14:48 PM
nikki
ah
2010-11-01 30515, 2010
14:48 PM
nikki
2010-11-01 30527, 2010
14:48 PM
nikki
which is just weird, deleted users shouldn't have tags
2010-11-01 30543, 2010
14:48 PM
djce
deleted users shouldn't exist at all :-)
2010-11-01 30507, 2010
14:49 PM
nikki
well I can understand them being there for stuff like edits
2010-11-01 30508, 2010
14:49 PM
djce
but, having said all that: users these days have a lot more data attached to them than they used to
2010-11-01 30536, 2010
14:49 PM
djce
so asking them to remove their own data may be inappropriate / impractical these days.
2010-11-01 30540, 2010
14:49 PM
nikki nods
2010-11-01 30502, 2010
14:50 PM
djce
IIRC I've only "deleted" about 4 users in 8 years or so.
2010-11-01 30554, 2010
15:10 PM
hawke_ joined the channel
2010-11-01 30545, 2010
17:32 PM
ruaok joined the channel
2010-11-01 30559, 2010
17:45 PM
jdamcd joined the channel
2010-11-01 30550, 2010
18:25 PM
ruaok joined the channel
2010-11-01 30508, 2010
18:29 PM
nikki joined the channel
2010-11-01 30525, 2010
18:48 PM
ijabz joined the channel
2010-11-01 30520, 2010
19:45 PM
djce joined the channel
2010-11-01 30555, 2010
19:45 PM
jdamcd joined the channel
2010-11-01 30516, 2010
19:47 PM
ocharles
ruaok: didn't make it to the office today, will send timesheets tomorrow
2010-11-01 30535, 2010
19:47 PM
ruaok
k
2010-11-01 30502, 2010
19:54 PM
enjayhch waves
2010-11-01 30535, 2010
19:54 PM
enjayhch
came home at a sane time today
2010-11-01 30544, 2010
19:54 PM
ocharles
hey enjayhch
2010-11-01 30552, 2010
19:54 PM
ocharles
if 8pm is sane for you, ok :P
2010-11-01 30520, 2010
19:55 PM
enjayhch
hello ocharles! What happened to Acid2?
2010-11-01 30526, 2010
19:56 PM
enjayhch
ocharles: left at 5.45 and home at about 6.30
2010-11-01 30517, 2010
19:58 PM
kurtjx joined the channel
2010-11-01 30528, 2010
19:58 PM
kurtjx
huwha
2010-11-01 30528, 2010
19:59 PM
ruaok
hi enjayhch
2010-11-01 30503, 2010
20:00 PM
ruaok
<BANG>
2010-11-01 30503, 2010
20:00 PM
MBChatLogger
2010-11-01 30507, 2010
20:00 PM
ruaok
welcome everyone!
2010-11-01 30529, 2010
20:00 PM
ruaok
please forgive me for not tracking too well. this head-cold isn't letting up just yet. :-(
2010-11-01 30546, 2010
20:00 PM
warp
hello!
2010-11-01 30551, 2010
20:00 PM
kurtjx
hi!
2010-11-01 30506, 2010
20:01 PM
ruaok
2010-11-01 30516, 2010
20:01 PM
ruaok snickers
2010-11-01 30531, 2010
20:01 PM
enjayhch
ruaok: because of the page load time?
2010-11-01 30553, 2010
20:01 PM
ruaok
no, the "stylized BBC logo".
2010-11-01 30554, 2010
20:01 PM
enjayhch
not heard anything more about it
2010-11-01 30558, 2010
20:01 PM
ruaok
never mind the page load time.
2010-11-01 30530, 2010
20:02 PM
ruaok
I wondered what UK parody laws are like. oh well, we'll see who gets their panties in a bunch next.
2010-11-01 30535, 2010
20:02 PM
ruaok
onward. reviews.
2010-11-01 30551, 2010
20:02 PM
ruaok
I think this will go quick. last week was a mixed bag in the MB world.
2010-11-01 30559, 2010
20:02 PM
ruaok
ocharles: you first?
2010-11-01 30543, 2010
20:03 PM
ocharles
Sure
2010-11-01 30553, 2010
20:03 PM
ocharles
I spent the week in SLO with ruaok, and had a great time hacking away
2010-11-01 30503, 2010
20:04 PM
ocharles
i spent just about the whole week working on improving the edit migration script
2010-11-01 30514, 2010
20:04 PM
ocharles
we now have this *done* and it runs in an appropriate time
2010-11-01 30515, 2010
20:04 PM
ruaok
with great results at that.
2010-11-01 30525, 2010
20:04 PM
ocharles
down from 12h to about 2h at most
2010-11-01 30536, 2010
20:04 PM
ruaok
well, I tried to run the script from the beginning and was rewarded with pages of errors.
2010-11-01 30545, 2010
20:04 PM
ruaok
some more cleanup work is required. :)
2010-11-01 30553, 2010
20:04 PM
ocharles
sadly, this sets me another week behind schedule, which is hopefully not too much of a problem because i'm still ahead of warp :)
2010-11-01 30501, 2010
20:05 PM
ocharles
ruaok: ok, we'll have to have a look at that
2010-11-01 30507, 2010
20:05 PM
ocharles
2010-11-01 30526, 2010
20:05 PM
ruaok
then the branch was out of date...
2010-11-01 30536, 2010
20:05 PM
ruaok
I saw the massive wall of errors and left it.
2010-11-01 30556, 2010
20:05 PM
ruaok
can you please look after that after the meeting?
2010-11-01 30510, 2010
20:06 PM
ruaok
but, overall the script should run in a reasonable amount of time now.
2010-11-01 30515, 2010
20:06 PM
ruaok
the thing that was slow?
2010-11-01 30520, 2010
20:06 PM
ruaok
Moose object creation.
2010-11-01 30532, 2010
20:06 PM
ruaok
not a problem when you have a handful of them in a page request.
2010-11-01 30549, 2010
20:06 PM
ruaok
but when you need to create 10M of them in a short period of time, its really bogs down. :(
2010-11-01 30557, 2010
20:06 PM
ocharles
indeed
2010-11-01 30506, 2010
20:07 PM
ruaok
ocharles: can you also please look at the backlog of reviews?
2010-11-01 30515, 2010
20:07 PM
ruaok
I know there are a bunch of shipits that need committing.
2010-11-01 30536, 2010
20:07 PM
ruaok
warp: how was your week?
2010-11-01 30546, 2010
20:07 PM
warp
not very good
2010-11-01 30547, 2010
20:07 PM
ocharles
ah yea, well I should be in the office tomorrow, so i'll get them done first
2010-11-01 30550, 2010
20:07 PM
ocharles
:(
2010-11-01 30555, 2010
20:07 PM
ruaok
ocharles: ok.
2010-11-01 30501, 2010
20:08 PM
ruaok
warp: alas. :-(
2010-11-01 30517, 2010
20:08 PM
warp
I had some issues crop up unrelated to musicbrainz which has caused me to not work from wednesday till today.
2010-11-01 30541, 2010
20:08 PM
warp
but that is mostly resolved
2010-11-01 30544, 2010
20:08 PM
ruaok
anything interesting mon/tue?
2010-11-01 30548, 2010
20:08 PM
warp
so I'll be back at work tomorrow
2010-11-01 30548, 2010
20:08 PM
ruaok
good. :)
2010-11-01 30553, 2010
20:08 PM
ruaok
ok.
2010-11-01 30518, 2010
20:09 PM
warp
I was working on lazy loading in the release editor as some of you may remember
2010-11-01 30525, 2010
20:09 PM
ruaok nods
2010-11-01 30552, 2010
20:09 PM
warp
most of that is done, there were still some issues with adding a new disc and such.
2010-11-01 30504, 2010
20:10 PM
warp
haven't tested it at all with a new release (so there's nothing to lazy load)
2010-11-01 30529, 2010
20:10 PM
warp
so, hopefully a good day of hacking and it's on code review.
2010-11-01 30539, 2010
20:10 PM
ruaok
good. lets hope for that tomorrow.
2010-11-01 30554, 2010
20:10 PM
ruaok
as for me, ocharles mostly covered it.
2010-11-01 30504, 2010
20:11 PM
ruaok
we did some hacking on the script, which is in good shape now.
2010-11-01 30516, 2010
20:11 PM
ruaok
we also did some team building (read: drink beer)
2010-11-01 30520, 2010
20:11 PM
warp
:D
2010-11-01 30541, 2010
20:11 PM
ruaok
it was nice to actually fart around with ocharles in the same room and work on some optimization stuff.
2010-11-01 30553, 2010
20:11 PM
ruaok
next year it will be warp's turn. :)
2010-11-01 30558, 2010
20:11 PM
warp
\o/
2010-11-01 30523, 2010
20:12 PM
ruaok
but on the last day ocharles was here I came down with a cold, which was getting better over the weekend.
2010-11-01 30533, 2010
20:12 PM
ocharles
i luckily seemed to have escaped that... so far
2010-11-01 30550, 2010
20:12 PM
ruaok
but today its not doing so well. I'll probably just head back to bed after this meeting.
2010-11-01 30506, 2010
20:13 PM
ruaok
ocharles: esp after flying for so long. good job.
2010-11-01 30521, 2010
20:13 PM
ruaok
enjayhch: anything new from the BBC?
2010-11-01 30521, 2010
20:13 PM
ocharles
well now my body clock is just... gone, but at least it's no illness
2010-11-01 30524, 2010
20:13 PM
ocharles touches wood
2010-11-01 30536, 2010
20:13 PM
ruaok
jetlag is tons of fun. :)
2010-11-01 30538, 2010
20:13 PM
enjayhch
I have been working on a MusicBrainz tagger for video clips
2010-11-01 30552, 2010
20:13 PM
enjayhch
for use inside the BBC
2010-11-01 30559, 2010
20:13 PM
warp
enjayhch: woah, sounds cool
2010-11-01 30510, 2010
20:14 PM
enjayhch
talks to an internal database that contains prgramme information, called PIPs
2010-11-01 30517, 2010
20:14 PM
enjayhch
that has a RESTful API
2010-11-01 30532, 2010
20:14 PM
enjayhch
it allows Content Producers to put video clips on artist pages
2010-11-01 30541, 2010
20:14 PM
ruaok
+1
2010-11-01 30545, 2010
20:14 PM
enjayhch
eg
2010-11-01 30546, 2010
20:14 PM
enjayhch
2010-11-01 30555, 2010
20:14 PM
enjayhch
(for those of you in the uk)
2010-11-01 30513, 2010
20:15 PM
ruaok
(not available in your area) :-(
2010-11-01 30532, 2010
20:15 PM
enjayhch
should allow use to display artists on clip pages too
2010-11-01 30547, 2010
20:15 PM
enjayhch
that is all from me I think
2010-11-01 30557, 2010
20:15 PM
ruaok
sounds promising. :)
2010-11-01 30506, 2010
20:16 PM
ruaok
kurtjx: anything from you?
2010-11-01 30515, 2010
20:16 PM
kurtjx
well jet lag
2010-11-01 30522, 2010
20:16 PM
kurtjx
i've done a couple blog posts
2010-11-01 30524, 2010
20:16 PM
ruaok
lol.
2010-11-01 30526, 2010
20:16 PM
ruaok
oh yes!
2010-11-01 30531, 2010
20:16 PM
kurtjx
realized one is a horrible mistake
2010-11-01 30536, 2010
20:16 PM
ruaok
good.
2010-11-01 30539, 2010
20:16 PM
kurtjx
i grossly over estimated number of rdfa pages
2010-11-01 30540, 2010
20:16 PM
ruaok
117B is way off.
2010-11-01 30547, 2010
20:16 PM
ruaok
its just the sum of all entities.
2010-11-01 30547, 2010
20:16 PM
kurtjx
yest it's like 12m
2010-11-01 30552, 2010
20:16 PM
ruaok
that sounds right.
2010-11-01 30555, 2010
20:16 PM
kurtjx
right no multiply
2010-11-01 30506, 2010
20:17 PM
kurtjx
so gonna fix that
2010-11-01 30509, 2010
20:17 PM
ruaok
but, the 117B number hit the tweetverse. heh.
2010-11-01 30522, 2010
20:17 PM
kurtjx
yes afraid it may have already
2010-11-01 30531, 2010
20:17 PM
kurtjx
i talked thru it with a guy a qmul
2010-11-01 30534, 2010
20:17 PM
kurtjx
and we were both like
2010-11-01 30535, 2010
20:17 PM
ruaok
well, its only an order of magnitude. not a big deal, right?
2010-11-01 30539, 2010
20:17 PM
kurtjx
hehe
2010-11-01 30553, 2010
20:17 PM
kurtjx
like two orders really
2010-11-01 30502, 2010
20:18 PM
ruaok
oh yeah. :)
