#musicbrainz

Yes. Picard is release (or album) based, while Classic was track based - from what I understand.

that's not so much the issue, it's just classic was automated

I mean, it would do everything for me if I told it to, Picard needs user intervention every time I add a new album, which for me would likly take longer than just editing the tags by hand

that's why I wasn't sure if I was using it right or not

but anyway, I need to go pick someone up, I'll be back in like 30 min'ish

hey, how do I tag musepack files with picard? all my .mpc files are getting listed as error files

what's the status of musepack compatability in picard? the website lists it as compatable, but picard won't tag my tracks. Can anybody help?

can anyone help me get picard to work with musepack files?

does picard work with musepack at all?

I think that's what mpc is... isn't it?

yeah

picard won't do anything with my mpc files but move them to the error files folder

do you know if I'm doing something wrong or anything?

make sure they're not readonly?

I know nothing about musepack

I stick to my ogg (flac/vorbis/etc.) bubble and am quite content with that

well, I have a boatload of mp3's, I can't lie about that

but that's because computer music is synonymous with mp3's

music on a computer, that is

can't get much higher quality than compressed but retaining bit for bit exactnessss

i don't have the harddrive space

300GB for $80

yeha I know, too lazy to order

bah, oh well

goodbye

Shepard` is now known as Shepard

Could I get some votes? http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=5304887 and http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=5304884

oh shit

don't tell me FreeDB just died (search)

Rondom_ is now known as Rondom

could someone give these edits a push so i can tag this release? http://musicbrainz.org/mod/search/results.html?...

isnt renaming them going to mess up the PUIDs?

be better to add track 13, & renumber tracks 13 &14 to 14 & 15. that wont mess the PUIDs then

i added the PUIDs after

ok

pushed :)

thanks

I'm stuck in the Add Release wizard

It tells me it's missing some required fields but none of the fields are empty nor have a different background color to mark them wrong or something

csnoop: does the artist exist

Wel, it did a freedb import for a new artist (Leya).

The first steps made me add the artist

and now the artist name is shown on top of the form and linked to it's mb page, so I guess it's recognized correctly

yeah, the artist is there

All the tracks have a nr, title and length

MusicBrainz needs a more 'live' notification system

I'd like to know whenever a vote is cast, a note is added, anything happens to an open mod

that sucks for e-mail, so I vote jabber

the release is named, attributes and language and script are given and two release events are entered.

But below the tracks there still is a "Please enter all the required elements of this release. The missing (or wrong) input fields are marked with a background color."

hmm, try removing one of the release events

It is removed on doing a "continue", but the warning remains.

you get an email for every note added Jason, and you can always look at your open edits to see the votes

Hmm, If I check "show track artists", all the artists show up empty

(although the release has an artist)

:O Fixed it

csnoop: ah! it obviously didn't pickup the artist because it was being created earlier in the process

excellent

AMurderofCrows, I'm well aware. But I'm lazy, and I'd like to be able to react to things at a moments notice

it's a bug, but by first making it a various artist and then converting back to single artist

XMPP (Jabber) can provide that reaction time :)

I always have a jabber client up, I don't always have e-mail open

Do I need to file a bug somewhere or is this something you can look in right now?

csnoop: I think there is probably a bug report covering that, I'll ask the developer of that screen a little later and if not raise one

perfect.. I like the new import style much better than the old one, it's really a smooth process.

I did miss a few things though, like adding an official website relation for the artist and an amazon id for the release.

hmmm.

morning nikki

hi hi

I wonder if we need someone to step in with this french capitalisation thing and just give some ruling on it.

yes, it is getting rather silly :)

getting?

admittedly I haven't followed the whole thread

inhouseuk: oh, this seems like a break in the release editor bug

the track artists are missing :-)

keschte: yes :)

hmm, some more disgustedness

a mouse drowned in the pool last night

o_O

keschte: are you squashing the same bug i asked you about yesterday?

I had a mouse get into my toaster once, didnt notice until after I started toasting some bread. The smell of toasted mouse is not the best way to start the morning

gross

hehe, eek

BrianG: help my flawed memory

<csnoop> It tells me it's missing some required fields but none of the fields are empty nor have a different background color to mark them wrong or somethin

hum

someone remind me how to use the track parser?

it's sucking miserably

i couldn't find that bug in trac

It's currently formatted as: ##.TRACK TITLE - Artist

I have the 'All tracknames start with a number' option checked... but... ???

its broken too

try it on test.musicbrainz.org, its waiting for a new bugfix release

:(

VxJasonxV: I'm with you on XMPP notifications.

:D

I always ask this, but I'm going to ask again