#musicbrainz

Si|enT- is now known as chillware

SerialNumber^ has joined #MusicBrainz

soo.. what filenameing format do you all use in picard?

chillware, can you take pm?

I can show you the ones I use

BrianFreud: pm sent

oh, I meant in IRC :)

Can you see the msg I just sent? (Some IRC clients don't support PMs)

god... SO much freedb crappy add releases added in

BrianFreud: i get this error from the server, so i don't think PM's are working for me :s - Private messages from unregistered users are currently blocked due to spam problems, but you can always message a staffer. Please register!

chillware: I'm not using MB for classical at the moment, but eventually I'll build it into my filenaming strings. Here's what I'm using currently for everything non-classical: http://dpaste.com/hold/9519/

I supose I should register

chillware, gotcha - yeah, it takes about 10 seconds to register, then you can take pms :)

I put it on the pasteboard instead for ya :)

cool, looks good

a lot more to it than mine currently..

:)

I had a lot of old original tagger files, where one release had split into 4 or 5 versions of the same release,

hence all the extra [] info I include

makes it easy to clean those back up

hmm, i like how you've got the date in there too

yeah - originally I just used %date%, but it gets messy, cause you have a lot of incomplete dates

that string cuts it down to either just [year] or nothing, which is a lot cleaner

so i your music folder, you end with just album names, instead of artist - album?

well, you get one of three results:

if it's a soundtrack, you get this: \Soundtracks\[official] [1951] Alice in Wonderland

if it's not, and it has a release date, you get this: \Alice in Chains\[album] [official] [1992] Dirt

otherwise you get this: \Alice in Chains\[single] [official] Angry Chair

oh, there's a \Music\ behind the 2 later examples

ahh, i see now..

i like it

whenever I add in classicalm

it then would go to \Classical\Composer\(then however I decide to do it from here)

I just wish MB supported Old Time Radio - for the moment, I use Otter for OTR, and it goes into \OTR\

how big is your collection of music?

around 1 TB

:P

nice, im about halfway there :)

was larger, but I recently lost a 400 and a 300

didn't have backups :(

eww, thats what i fear most.. i run a raid 5 now, and building a 2nd machine later this week for an extra backup

i have a Thecus N5200B, works very well

yeah, I have part of mine on RAID5, but these were new drives, moved off some drives I didn;t trust, trashed the old drives

the new 2 drives died within 2 months of purchase :(

:(

both Seagates

what kind of music do you collect?

my seagates seem to be working well.. ive converted to them from WD

all 7200.10 500gb's

hmmm, it's a lot of types - I have a small list at my wiki site - but pretty much anything, except for most country and all gospel

very cool

yeah, I think I just got a bad batch of Seagates

my wiki, btw: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/BrianFreud?action=show

we should figure a way to trade some stuff :)

yikes. 1TB is a lot.

lol

total playtime? :)

just have to finish the last 200 or so albums not in mb, and ID the random files

hmmmm... depends if you count in the 32 kbps OTR

without, prob 5 or 6 months

ofcourse!

hehe

lol

warp, I know this is rhetorical, but why do newbies import so much unfixed crap from freedb with no proof links?

lol

the no proof links is easy, that's just too much work when import/add lots... the edits usually go through anyway.

i usually don't add proof links until i'm asked to.

I know... just having to clean up and ask too often on some of this crap

s/import/you import/

some guy imported 5 albums in English with full caps

"guess case didn;'t fix it so I assumed it was ok"

just vote no.

get the lazy bastards :)

I just slap em with the standard string...

"Please provide a link to an online store with this release so we can verify it. Thanks!" with an abstain til they give me something

some guy actually gave me piratebay.org as a proof link

lol

why an online store?

because when I didn't specify, I was seeing too many torrent trackers

oh, i would vote NO on the uppercase stuff you mentioned. it's too much work to change later, better to have them try again properly.

I fixed 4 of them, then slapped him when he ignored me and kept adding anyhow

:)

prob more patience on my part than it was worth...

but I was tired of the Nirvana edits :P

2200 editors, 177 voters...

yes, the voters vs editors is a problem.

i enabled inline votes to vote a little bit more on my subscribed artists.

but in general i don't vote much either.

I myself am guilty... I first registerd in 2005. I added a bunch of releases, no attention to styleguides, and had a bunch of votes go against me (evern though some actually, wierdly enough, match with current guidelines).

Then I came back in 2006, same thing.

This time, I got interested in what was going on behind the tagger, and I started to try to figure things out.

hrm

Problem is, it's too easy to add a release with no clue of how things work, then everyone else ends up having to clean up the mess, esp when they slip through because < 3 votes.

I mean, looking at the open English add releases only, there werr 1650 of them, 100+ expiring tomorrow with 1 or 0 votes on any...

and a lot of them look... off.

they do?

i would assume most are more or less ok (but incomplete), there's not _that_ much you can fuck up on a normal english tracklisting :)

no guess case, all lowercase, freedb imports with no status or script set and no proof, all uppercase imports, stuff using torrent sites as "proof", etc

I found when I joined I voted plenty the first few weeks, then stopped entirely because I was too darn sick of these hundreds of vote requests every day

The other string I end up using a lot is "Is there a reason we're ignoring the capitalization style guidelines on this release? If not, please remmeber to use guess case."

dwg: maybe... I know I've made it to number 1 without trying... but getting frustrated with the amounts of signal to noise...

BrianFreud: good work! :)

a "catch up" feature might be useful

hw do you mean?

which abstains from all outstanding subscribed votes

so you can get back to voting on new edits without having to work through an enormous backlog

dwg: they'll automatically expire anyway :)

warp: eventually

not really

not quickly enough, to prevent a hugh backlog

s/hugh/huge/

how many times have you gone to figure out how a release got in in the first place,

and by that time more votes will have come in

only to find it got in because it had 1 or 0 votes on expire?

more clumping of edits would help, but I imagine that's not easy to implement on the db side

I just fixed a bunch of VA releases today where someone randomly chose the first "Nirvana" in the list, rather than look to figure which was right

so you had 60's compilations with a track attrib'd to a 90's grunge band

every one got in with 1 yes vote

haha, ouch.

dwg: I could see that for batch ARs, say "X wrote Y for every Y in this batch"

yeah, there are some others

but not for adds and such

which I've forgotten since I was actively voting

basically I did a lot of mb stuff when I first signed up, then have done hardly any since I finished the vacation I was on at the time

I just wonder, as much as we all argue over the fine points, and as much as we all concentrate on our own pet projects (jazz, classical, Nirvana, what have you)

how much of the rest of the db is slowly turning to muck?

I should probably trim my subscribed list way down and actually get back to voting on something at least

dwg: i recommend enabling inline votes.

inline votes?

seconded

dwg: in preferences

what does that do?

it shows a vote at the top of the screen all the time

ah, rightio