#musicbrainz

Memorial day weekend in the US. three day holiday.

Gotta go, bye.

Is it correct to link to WP page of a movie a CD is a soundtrack for?

pbryan: better to use IMDB

yllona: Aaaaalrighty then.

pbryan: in my experience, WP can get cast/crew assignments wrong. i was looking at at an actor's bio this morning... just plain *wrong*

creature_ is now known as creature

Hehehe

what a lovely sight

Well, the name of the track is the same. In most cases, anyway.

srotta: puid mess again? :)

omg :)

srotta: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/27163

the problem is figuring out which not to remove

ummm, forgot to update that

it doesn't mach VA tracks

match even

fixed

MBChatLogger: off

is not logging

is logging

.. and that's my story

man, that's pretty messed up

i know

Wow.

I never knew, CatCat.

Everything's fine now though?

jaja

if any classical editor has a suggestion for this: http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=8847633 please do

nikki_ is now known as nikki

Yaw

phew. all this editing is getting me tired

Hey, when I use picard and do a lookup on a whole folder, it gets the track matched and has a huge list of [loading album information] at the moment. Does that mean it'll load when they're all finished, or is it b0rfed

Oh hawt it loads

It only does 1 request a second, and when you're doing a lot of lookups they take priority

track.

*for that Beethoven track.

mikemorr: I have used "additionally composed" when people have composed a tune based on a traditional one, or have added additional pieces to it etc.

so the opposite of what I said, then?

(which would make sense in some cases)

I guess whichever composer's contribution is less important to the track/work at hand should be the "additionally" one. In some variations the original theme is barely recognizable so I would say in those cases the theme-composer is the less significant of the two.

mikemorr: Sounds good to me. :)

Anybody getting any PUID matches through picard? - first erase tags from a file with a PUID, then analyze, no PUID match. genpuid gives correct PUID, so maybe http://ofa.musicdns.org/ misbehaving?

moin!

hehe.

put some earphones on the dog, and you have a new musicbrainz logo!

:-)

Man, Los Campesinos are damn good

Broken Heartbeats sound like Breakbeats :D

Jormangeud: Can't find any PUIDs currently.

does someone know if there is a way to uninstall picard when installed from trunk?

setup.py uninstall ?

should work....

no... it's not a supported command

:-(

IIRC, it installs the picard binary and a set of musicbrainz picard packages.

should be easy to remove by hand

mikemorr: but that's not a variation or anything the like. it literally is a work that was initially conmposed with 5 movements but never published. 2 other movements composed later, and published like this...

mikemorr: and in the case of such variations i do indeed use aditionally composed by the original author some years earlier

Oh, that track is all the variations? I was thinking it was just one of them.

If it's all of them then I would say composed from 1799 to 1805, and no "additionally composed".

But if it's one of the mvts. that was composed in 1799, and there's no 1805 material in it, then I would say just use 1799 and don't mention 1805 at all.

(because I think the AR should list the year of composition, not the year of publication)

brb

So if each mvt. were a separate track, the tracks might have different dates or different combinations of dates.

that makes sense