Yes, it looks a little odd, but thats just because its new.
2009-02-01 03242, 2009
brianfreud
aCiD2: what do you think
2009-02-01 03221, 2009
navap
If you look at the search pages, they always show the relevent column on the left.
2009-02-01 03223, 2009
navap
You read left to right..etc
2009-02-01 03210, 2009
navap hopes no one says anything about other languages that read right to left :p
2009-02-01 03258, 2009
brianfreud leaves it as it is now...
2009-02-01 03209, 2009
brianfreud
It takes a little getting used to, but it does make a TON more sense
2009-02-01 03240, 2009
navap
Slip it into your next excercise break, see what peoples reactions are.
2009-02-01 03251, 2009
navap
Excersie being all the push/pulling you've been doing :p
2009-02-01 03257, 2009
brianfreud
lol
2009-02-01 03214, 2009
navap
My spelling is terrible, exercise*
2009-02-01 03214, 2009
brianfreud
well, I have the next 2 days off, so I hope to get all the rest of the templates done, then I've decided to make the few tables screen-reader happy (was reading up on it while waiting for the bus after work :P), then merge in pronik's work, then merge up to aCiD2's branch, and fix all the forms stuff I've currently broken with my mix of the old and new forms code :P
2009-02-01 03242, 2009
navap
Looks like you're in for plenty of exercise.
2009-02-01 03248, 2009
brianfreud
:)
2009-02-01 03250, 2009
pbryan had too much deep fried food and expects to ROTFHAHA.
2009-02-01 03254, 2009
brianfreud
I'll leave the server running, if anyone else wants to see what it looks like with the release column moved
brianfreud: Maybe shift the Date column to be inbetween Title and Tracks?
2009-02-01 03248, 2009
brianfreud
I was thinking that too
2009-02-01 03257, 2009
symphonick has quit
2009-02-01 03202, 2009
brianfreud
but I think track count is more important info than date
2009-02-01 03203, 2009
navap
It's a little more "important" data.
2009-02-01 03221, 2009
navap
It is, but I think it would look odd to split the track/disc/puid trio.
2009-02-01 03230, 2009
brianfreud
exactly
2009-02-01 03243, 2009
navap
Which means, if you didn't split it, Dates ends up just one spot ahead of where it is now.
2009-02-01 03246, 2009
brianfreud
I think moving the release title column is a big enough change
2009-02-01 03200, 2009
navap
Ya
2009-02-01 03200, 2009
brianfreud
and official > date, imho
2009-02-01 03232, 2009
navap
Column sorting would actually be *really* nice :)
2009-02-01 03206, 2009
brianfreud plans to add it w/js - code already written, just needs integration
2009-02-01 03214, 2009
navap
Awesome
2009-02-01 03205, 2009
brianfreud
ok, back to code :)
2009-02-01 03232, 2009
aCiD2 looks
2009-02-01 03234, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK joined the channel
2009-02-01 03245, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
Picard keeps incorrectly tagging my music. :(
2009-02-01 03203, 2009
aCiD2
That's pretty nice actually brian...
2009-02-01 03209, 2009
navap
Incorrect according to what?
2009-02-01 03248, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: Incorrect names.
2009-02-01 03257, 2009
aCiD2
Order should be title, tracks, date though, imo
2009-02-01 03259, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
Track names, author, album, etc
2009-02-01 03210, 2009
aCiD2
and brian, what have you done to the search box :P
2009-02-01 03225, 2009
brianfreud
aCiD2: Right now, everything is a mix of old and new forms code
2009-02-01 03232, 2009
brianfreud
Going to fix it all when I merge up to your branch
2009-02-01 03234, 2009
aCiD2
you might want to pull upstream/master btw, it has some fixes to that page
2009-02-01 03248, 2009
aCiD2
like correctly showing nats, and correct sorting
2009-02-01 03201, 2009
navap
Samuel-NotAFK: How are you looking the data up? Have an example of an album?
2009-02-01 03217, 2009
brianfreud
well, I have every template that's not yet converted loaded in gedit atm, would rather do that painful merge all in one go, rather than part now, part later
2009-02-01 03219, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: Individual songs.
2009-02-01 03225, 2009
aCiD2
brianfreud: sure thing
2009-02-01 03228, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: Albums seem to be tagged fine.
2009-02-01 03235, 2009
brianfreud figures to do that in 4-5 hrs :P
2009-02-01 03200, 2009
navap
Well, Picard is definitley oriented towards tagging albums, not individual songs.
2009-02-01 03211, 2009
brianfreud
aCiD2: as afar as you recall, did you ever use th tags anywhere?
2009-02-01 03228, 2009
navap
Try clicking the bottom lookup button and manually matching the track with one oneline.
2009-02-01 03233, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: But sometimes I download invidual songs.
2009-02-01 03241, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: Manually FTL
2009-02-01 03255, 2009
navap
Individual songs ftl..
2009-02-01 03213, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: But most songs in albums are poopoo.
2009-02-01 03238, 2009
catgroove
ARGMOMBASSA
2009-02-01 03210, 2009
catgroove
ok so dildos neigbours are screaming and hollering at 01:21
2009-02-01 03210, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: So I should only download full albums from The Pirate Bay from now on?
2009-02-01 03219, 2009
catgroove
not the same neigbours that whine about me though
2009-02-01 03221, 2009
catgroove
but still
2009-02-01 03225, 2009
navap
Get better albums then ;) Can't have it both ways. A portion of the data that Picard uses to match a file is comprised of album specific data, like track number, album name, album artist..
2009-02-01 03235, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
catgroove: And that bothers you?
2009-02-01 03240, 2009
catgroove
everybody are assholes me included, but there are a separated rules for me, and everybody else
2009-02-01 03242, 2009
catgroove
ffs
2009-02-01 03237, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: I downloaded a Green Day album and it mostly got tagged just fine but then I downloaded 100 random tracks and they didn't get tagged very well at all.
2009-02-01 03249, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
catgroove: Knock on their door and ask to join in.
2009-02-01 03207, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
Tell them to either let you take part or to STFU.
2009-02-01 03236, 2009
navap
Well as I said, Picard is oriented towards tagging albums at a time. If you want to tag individual tags accurately, I recommend doing it manually as you will get the best result that way.
2009-02-01 03239, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
catgroove: And it put random songs into the same, incorrect albm.
2009-02-01 03245, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
s/albm/album/
2009-02-01 03219, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
navap: I HATE tagging music manually.
2009-02-01 03223, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
It's a fucking chore.
2009-02-01 03241, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
That's why I fucking love Picard.
2009-02-01 03240, 2009
chefkoch has quit
2009-02-01 03240, 2009
catgroove
I don't want to partake, i want to sleep, also i don't know where they aare i've beentrying to look, furter i think they stopped now (kryss itaket) finally, uh i don't care about albums :p
2009-02-01 03250, 2009
catgroove
I don't want to partake, i want to sleep, also i don't know where they aare i've beentrying to look, furter i think they stopped now (kryss itaket) finally, uh i don't care about albums :p
2009-02-01 03215, 2009
chefkoch joined the channel
2009-02-01 03227, 2009
catgroove
natta all
2009-02-01 03237, 2009
warp has quit
2009-02-01 03212, 2009
navap
natta catgroove
2009-02-01 03247, 2009
brianfreud has quit
2009-02-01 03203, 2009
brianfreud joined the channel
2009-02-01 03231, 2009
brianfreud
yay! Deluge just released 1.1.2... been waiting for that :) fix the damn "checking"... forever... bug :P
2009-02-01 03237, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
brianfreud: I use Deluge.
2009-02-01 03255, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
I can't remember why I replaced Ktorrent with it.
2009-02-01 03213, 2009
brianfreud
I find it's a lot more stable than ktorrent, in ubuntu - but the "checking" bug drove me nuts
2009-02-01 03228, 2009
brianfreud
1.1.2's supposed to be the big fix for that
2009-02-01 03230, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
Lots of things are unstable in Ubuntu.
2009-02-01 03237, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
Deluge is useless in Windows.
2009-02-01 03248, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
Deluge is horribly unstable,
2009-02-01 03249, 2009
brianfreud
redundancy alert :P
2009-02-01 03257, 2009
brianfreud
Windows is useless in Windows :D
2009-02-01 03210, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
brianfreud: Go eat lemons.
2009-02-01 03224, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
s/eat/suck/
2009-02-01 03234, 2009
brianfreud prefers to work on tt code, but thanks :)
2009-02-01 03236, 2009
ruaok has quit
2009-02-01 03225, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK
I wish things would stop being so stiff.
2009-02-01 03234, 2009
chefkoch has quit
2009-02-01 03233, 2009
rga joined the channel
2009-02-01 03223, 2009
rga has left the channel
2009-02-01 03249, 2009
roxo joined the channel
2009-02-01 03258, 2009
roxo
brasil?
2009-02-01 03244, 2009
Rif joined the channel
2009-02-01 03225, 2009
roxo has quit
2009-02-01 03247, 2009
RifRaf has quit
2009-02-01 03212, 2009
xlotlu_ joined the channel
2009-02-01 03242, 2009
xlotlu has quit
2009-02-01 03221, 2009
Samuel-NotAFK has quit
2009-02-01 03203, 2009
navap
For some reason I can't log into test using ff, but I can with Opera/Safari/Chrome.
2009-02-01 03237, 2009
navap
The login form submits, and I'm returned to it with a blank form.
2009-02-01 03205, 2009
alastairp
javascript?
2009-02-01 03252, 2009
navap
Don't think I've messed around with any of those settings, I hardly use ff.
2009-02-01 03201, 2009
alastairp
(works fine here)
2009-02-01 03203, 2009
navap
Javascript is enabled.
2009-02-01 03242, 2009
navap
What would cause that behaviour on my end though :s
2009-02-01 03212, 2009
navap
I was in the middle of writing a ticket about login pages not redirecting to where they should when I realized the login doesn't work at all for me in ff
2009-02-01 03228, 2009
navap
Just another reason why I don't like ff :/
2009-02-01 03204, 2009
navap
And what the hell..I try over and over, and all of a sudden it starts working.
2009-02-01 03233, 2009
navap goes off and grumbles to himself
2009-02-01 03211, 2009
xlotlu_ has quit
2009-02-01 03220, 2009
VxJasonxV
it's not ff, it's "Fx"
2009-02-01 03221, 2009
xlotlu_ joined the channel
2009-02-01 03236, 2009
brianfreud
JS isn't doing anything re: login on test, so it shouldn't be affecting that
2009-02-01 03207, 2009
navap
brianfreud: Remember how I pointed out that some links cause the sidebar to lose it's state? That's happening again on test.
2009-02-01 03221, 2009
navap
Should I file a bug, or is that something that's already fixed?
