luks: how easy would it be to make 'add label' edits autoedits for everyone?
ruaok
easy
navap
I thought the point was they can't fail, but because they're not autoedits it makes it easy to spot dupes. (It you're looking for them anyway)
If*
nikki
navap: people can search for 'add label' and 'not before x hours ago'
luks
very easy
ruaok
nikki: did you find your missing response? It went to mb-users
nikki
ohh
navap
I'm just quoting voiceinsideyou here :p He's the crazy one that hunts down edits like those.
nikki
I have nearly all the mailing lists in the same folder so I didn't notice
navap
Does the mailinglist archiver have a cut off point? I sent an email and the last section was cut out online. It ended the email at quite a bad spot as well..
The email that people received had the whole thing though.
nikki
navap: I know it wasn't your argument, hence why I said 'people' and not 'you' ;) it's just a poor argument for keeping them as they are
navap
I agree, I pind it odd that a user can be presented with a voting screen, and if they vote no nothing happens :/
nikki
anyway, ruaok, luks, whoever, could we change them to be autoedits for the tt release? the current behaviour is that they don't get removed even if they fail because the attached release events stop them from being removable... it's a lot like artists used to be, as far as I remember
ruaok
seems reasonable to me.
enter an enhancement request? that way voice gets a chance to pipe up. :)
warp finally gets around to reading ProposedUserVoiceWorkflow
luks
I don't get what is uservoice useful for :(
warp
luks: getting feedback from users about what features they want, and have those same users somewhat prioritise them. (by majority rule basically).
ruaok
I'd be happier if we could vote for bugs/enhancements in trac.
but thats less user friendly for the non-geeks.
luks
I don't think voting is a solution to anything, personally
voting by users, that is
ruaok
I think its a valid concept for gauging people's interest.
warp
luks: i think it is a valid way to measure interest in a certain feature, if you are aware of the limitations of doing it that way.
acid2 joined the channel
navap wonders what kind of feature enhancments people could want that a) Aren't bugs that need fixing and b) Features that everyone wants as already on the table..even if it is on the far side (NGS for example).
acid2
woooooooo
warp
ruaok: are you aware of any trac plugins which would allawy some kind of voting, etc..?
acid2
:)
ruaok
no, but I haven't looked.
acid2 catches up on chatlogs
acid2: hola!
acid2
hola!
luks
warp: well, I find it similar to ubuntu's brainstorm
warp
ruaok: ok, i guess some should be spent exploring that direction before any decision can be made on the topic.
acid2 has quit
+time
luks
warp: which is full of stupid ideas (people don't know what they really want)
ruaok
luks: you're spot on there.
nikki
with uservoice, all that stuff stays in uservoice instead of ending up in trac :P
luks
I can close tickets in trac, and I can get emails about new tickets in trac
I can do neither in uservoice
navap
Well, what do people want that we don't know about already?
ruaok
nikki: did you ever make any progress on the feedback button for the old server?
warp
luks: i'm not familiar with brainstorm (i'll have a look), i agree with the general assumption that users are stupid.
navap
UV has RSS
nikki
no, I had to go to bed
acid2 joined the channel
navap
Not saying that RSS is "good" just stating it as a fact.
nikki
ruaok: CatCat also discovered that the button on your server doesn't work in opera 9.2x too
ruaok
oh lovely.
warp
luks: you don't have to! we'll have UV admins to filter between stupid users and developers :)
navap
nikki: Is 9.2 the latest version for mac?
nikki
luks: they can be closed in uservoice, I guess you just need to be an admin to do that
navap
He is on a mac right?
nikki
navap: nah, of course not
they have 10a ones out and stuff
luks
navap: have you tried the RSS? :P
nikki
and yes, he's on a mac
navap
Well, then tell him to upgrade and be done with it!