#musicbrainz

/

      • danbri joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12106, 2010

      • DarkerAudit joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12104, 2010

      • herojoker joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12155, 2010

      • sqbell_ joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12129, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12150, 2010

      • MightyJay joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12153, 2010

      • Leftmost joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12136, 2010

      • kurtjx joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12156, 2010

      • liDEL joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12130, 2010

      • liDEL joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12137, 2010

      • liDEL joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12110, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12121, 2010

      • xlotlu joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12111, 2010

      • CatCat joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12156, 2010

      • alastairp joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12104, 2010

      • BurgessShale joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12106, 2010

      • nikki
        does anyone know what relationships "total sound producer" and "sound producer" should be?
      • 2010-05-01 12155, 2010

      • Jormangeud joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12138, 2010

      • MightyJay joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12101, 2010

      • fatih joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12147, 2010

      • nikki
        hmm... I think "A.pf" is supposed to be an instrument of some kind but I haven't got a clue what
      • 2010-05-01 12153, 2010

      • yvesr joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12132, 2010

      • fatih
      • 2010-05-01 12122, 2010

      • nikki
        ahh, thanks
      • 2010-05-01 12111, 2010

      • DarkerAudit joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12129, 2010

      • honktonk joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12157, 2010

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12150, 2010

      • Rondom joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12150, 2010

      • xlotlu joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12157, 2010

      • honktonk joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12155, 2010

      • xlotlu joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12112, 2010

      • ianmcorvidae|alt joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12107, 2010

      • DarkerAudit joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12152, 2010

      • fatih joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12153, 2010

      • yoasif joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12155, 2010

      • ekes joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12121, 2010

      • ekes
        Advice: Just transcoding a three cd compilation. Seem's these three are identical enough to even end up with Disc ID's split between them:
      • 2010-05-01 12132, 2010

      • ekes
      • 2010-05-01 12142, 2010

      • ekes
      • 2010-05-01 12151, 2010

      • ekes
      • 2010-05-01 12104, 2010

      • ekes
        (last has another disc - the third listed seperately)
      • 2010-05-01 12125, 2010

      • ekes
        What's the form there?
      • 2010-05-01 12136, 2010

      • ekes
        s/form/normal thing to do with them/
      • 2010-05-01 12107, 2010

      • ekes has it released as Industrial Virus - fwiw
      • 2010-05-01 12152, 2010

      • fatih
        ekes: Industrial Virus disc 3 is here: http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/1b9b4a53-0dd…
      • 2010-05-01 12132, 2010

      • fatih
        If I were you I'd add the disc 1 too.
      • 2010-05-01 12132, 2010

      • ekes
        fatih: yer, but the three releases, except for the title are the same. When I put my CD in the disc IDs identifies the discs as part of the other compilations (with the same tracks etc). So what do you do... add the disc id to two different releases - just for the title? Can you clone a release for that?
      • 2010-05-01 12109, 2010

      • Leftmost
        I think the accepted policy is to leave identical releases as the same release.
      • 2010-05-01 12137, 2010

      • fatih
        Industrial Armageddon is a 2 disc release.
      • 2010-05-01 12157, 2010

      • fatih
        Industrial Virus has 3 discs.
      • 2010-05-01 12141, 2010

      • fatih
        But Industrial Virus and Industrial Hazard are identical.
      • 2010-05-01 12105, 2010

      • ekes
        jep, just googled, Industrial Armageddon despite having one of the discids (and same tracks) just has one less disc. So the challenge is how do you merge Industrial Virus and Industrial Hazard?
      • 2010-05-01 12101, 2010

      • fatih
        Discs 2&3 of I.V. are in MB but disc 1 is not. You can either add disc 1 too, and add "later release of" relationships, or merge discs 2 and 3 into corresponding Industrial Hazard discs.
      • 2010-05-01 12142, 2010

      • fatih
        But I don't see a problem with duplicate releases with different titles, because in NGS each release event will be a separate release anyway.
      • 2010-05-01 12149, 2010

      • ekes googles NGS - ok...
      • 2010-05-01 12109, 2010

      • ekes
        I do think in this case it's just a one off release with a different title. 'Diseased by Total/BMG'
      • 2010-05-01 12140, 2010

      • ekes
        Also I dunno how NGS will work - but you want to syncronise any cleanup on the titles etc.
      • 2010-05-01 12137, 2010

      • ekes
        any cleanup or annotations I guess..
      • 2010-05-01 12158, 2010

      • dinog1 joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12100, 2010

      • dinog joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12101, 2010

      • dinog1 joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12139, 2010

      • neothe0ne joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12103, 2010

      • neothe0ne
        anyone want to discuss rewriting / removing Extra Title Information Style
      • 2010-05-01 12117, 2010

      • neothe0ne
        brianfreud?
      • 2010-05-01 12129, 2010

      • brianfreud
        yes?
      • 2010-05-01 12102, 2010

      • brianfreud
        I've been leaving ETI style alone for now, until after NGS and Warp's title proposal.
      • 2010-05-01 12107, 2010

      • neothe0ne
        would you agree with my view that ETI is written PURELY from an English/latin point of view.
      • 2010-05-01 12138, 2010

      • neothe0ne
        both important sentences in the guideilne talk about requiring parentheses (not used in all languages as the standard) and case (many dont, obviously pictograpohic languages)
      • 2010-05-01 12147, 2010

      • dinog joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12150, 2010

      • neothe0ne
        (and what is warp's title proposal)
      • 2010-05-01 12118, 2010

      • nikki
        hi neo
      • 2010-05-01 12137, 2010

      • neothe0ne
        hi nikki
      • 2010-05-01 12140, 2010

      • neothe0ne
        hi nikki
      • 2010-05-01 12122, 2010

      • nikki
        if you read the extra title stuff literally, it even messes up german
      • 2010-05-01 12118, 2010

      • nikki
        so I do agree that it's written from an english point of view :P
      • 2010-05-01 12103, 2010

      • nikki
        and warp's title stuff is on http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:kuno/Post_NGS_St… although it's nowhere near finished
      • 2010-05-01 12122, 2010

      • dinog1 joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12131, 2010

      • dinog joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12153, 2010

      • dinog1 joined the channel
      • 2010-05-01 12102, 2010

      • dinog joined the channel