#musicbrainz

/

      • Kionmaru scratches his head
      • 2012-06-01 15324, 2012

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15347, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15314, 2012

      • JoeMoose joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15317, 2012

      • JoeMoose joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15349, 2012

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15323, 2012

      • VxJasonxV^
        umm
      • 2012-06-01 15343, 2012

      • VxJasonxV
        I assume CD TOC submission works on Indexed search, and cannot use direct search at all?
      • 2012-06-01 15301, 2012

      • VxJasonxV
        because it's digital media, UGH
      • 2012-06-01 15325, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        ?
      • 2012-06-01 15334, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        No idea. *blinks*
      • 2012-06-01 15312, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15330, 2012

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15349, 2012

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15357, 2012

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15354, 2012

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15357, 2012

      • JoeLlama joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15300, 2012

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15335, 2012

      • jcazevedo joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15320, 2012

      • ruaok_ joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15341, 2012

      • reosarevok wonders how come we have so much grindcore
      • 2012-06-01 15354, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I'd have expected stuff with names like "Fragrant Facial Purulence" to be more niche
      • 2012-06-01 15315, 2012

      • xplt joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15335, 2012

      • warp
        I wonder what grindcore is now.
      • 2012-06-01 15325, 2012

      • xplt
        reosarevok: I finally made these edits: http://musicbrainz.org/edit/17831222 / http://musicbrainz.org/edit/17831223 Are they correct?
      • 2012-06-01 15334, 2012

      • reosarevok
        You mean it vs. "what it was before" or vs. "I didn't wonder before"?
      • 2012-06-01 15331, 2012

      • reosarevok
        xplt: I guess so. They can't be worse than what's there nowe
      • 2012-06-01 15346, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Approved
      • 2012-06-01 15304, 2012

      • reosarevok
        now, even
      • 2012-06-01 15330, 2012

      • xplt
        reosarevok: thanks! :)
      • 2012-06-01 15336, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Oo
      • 2012-06-01 15340, 2012

      • warp
        reosarevok: I am wondering what grindcore is. I wasn't wondering before, I started wondering on this subject after you mentioned it.
      • 2012-06-01 15343, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Are we showing edits to see who gets smacked down first?
      • 2012-06-01 15313, 2012

      • HazRPG joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15322, 2012

      • reosarevok
        warp: the wiki page is not too bad a description http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grindcore
      • 2012-06-01 15345, 2012

      • reosarevok
        "A variety of "microgenres" have subsequently emerged, often labeling bands according to traits that deviate from regular grindcore, including goregrind, focused on themes of gore, and pornogrind, fixated on pornographic lyrical themes"
      • 2012-06-01 15352, 2012

      • reosarevok
        those seem to be the ones I end up finding more often
      • 2012-06-01 15316, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (and the ones that mix both in intentionally repulsive ways, too)
      • 2012-06-01 15334, 2012

      • warp
        haha
      • 2012-06-01 15305, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Kionmaru: that one was related to some chat we had here a while ago. But people showing edits and asking for advice / checking is not too strange either
      • 2012-06-01 15335, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        http://musicbrainz.org/user/kionmaru/edits/open Ignoring the one I shouldn't have made in the first place.. (Learned something about searching there.. v.v)
      • 2012-06-01 15349, 2012

      • KRSCuan joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15355, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Am I doing anything egregariously wrong? A lot of these I'm running into just seem to be... pretty barebones.
      • 2012-06-01 15348, 2012

      • HazRPG joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15326, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Kionmaru: nothing very wrong it seems
      • 2012-06-01 15349, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Kionmaru: for http://musicbrainz.org/release/20432c56-f0fe-4e5f… it is better if you add the relationships to recordings instead of to the release
      • 2012-06-01 15325, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Okay - why?
      • 2012-06-01 15342, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        If each track had a different orchestra or conductor, yes, but why in this case? :0
      • 2012-06-01 15345, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        :)
      • 2012-06-01 15357, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Because it's more specific, and those recordings could be reused in another release without needing to re-enter the info
      • 2012-06-01 15303, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Okay.
      • 2012-06-01 15330, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Oh, for http://musicbrainz.org/edit/17830471 - we no longer put the artists in the title, but in the release title field, see http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Classical
      • 2012-06-01 15330, 2012

      • HazRPG_ joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15349, 2012

      • reosarevok
        But classical editing is all kinda messy and complicated now, so that part is understandable :)
      • 2012-06-01 15357, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        ...
      • 2012-06-01 15308, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Actually, I can go so far as to say "But that one linked to as proper on your wiki did!" lol
      • 2012-06-01 15344, 2012

      • reosarevok
        We did put them in titles until a very short time ago (see "no longer" ;) )
      • 2012-06-01 15353, 2012

      • reosarevok
        So it's normal that most of them still have it like that
      • 2012-06-01 15306, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        ;)
      • 2012-06-01 15314, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        tbh your classical wiki pages are... confusing
      • 2012-06-01 15330, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        there's one that's historical that links to itself as the main article and gets redirected back to historical
      • 2012-06-01 15347, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        So... It should go in the release group field.
      • 2012-06-01 15304, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Kionmaru: we know, we know. Working on it, little by little
      • 2012-06-01 15315, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Yep
      • 2012-06-01 15317, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        I can tell
      • 2012-06-01 15323, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I'm changing this one so you can see how it's done now :)
      • 2012-06-01 15326, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Uhm.. Okay, so I have to cancel the edit to re-edit it?
      • 2012-06-01 15333, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Nah, I approved it to change it
      • 2012-06-01 15342, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (usually, yeah, you would have to)
      • 2012-06-01 15344, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        ah ok
      • 2012-06-01 15328, 2012

      • reosarevok
      • 2012-06-01 15313, 2012

      • reosarevok joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15321, 2012

      • reosarevok
        grr crapwifi
      • 2012-06-01 15323, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (what you should cancel to re-enter as "relate to recordings" instead are the performer/conductor ones)
      • 2012-06-01 15331, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        reosarevok: As far as I can tell 17830512 and 17830528
      • 2012-06-01 15344, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        if I'm parsing your typonese right
      • 2012-06-01 15356, 2012

      • reosarevok
        heh
      • 2012-06-01 15306, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Indeed
      • 2012-06-01 15325, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        However
      • 2012-06-01 15328, 2012

      • reosarevok
        The rest looks fine to me, although I know little about spirituals etc. But I guess it's fine
      • 2012-06-01 15331, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Wouldn't it be more consistent to have both?
      • 2012-06-01 15352, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Well.. *points upwards a few pages* it's generally better than what's there, except for.. Now that I've found the cancel button
      • 2012-06-01 15315, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        that hear it in our voice release group got duplicated
      • 2012-06-01 15316, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Uhm
      • 2012-06-01 15323, 2012

      • Kionmaru
      • 2012-06-01 15336, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Thats an edit to merge them together because I'm still learning your system :D
      • 2012-06-01 15349, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Did the new disc ID get tagged on one of those? I couldn't tell.
      • 2012-06-01 15349, 2012

      • reosarevok
        huh
      • 2012-06-01 15305, 2012

      • reosarevok
      • 2012-06-01 15307, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        I found a note in the wiki saying it may take 24 hours.
      • 2012-06-01 15327, 2012

      • reosarevok
        And about this: http://musicbrainz.org/release/4562c96f-fc9c-4f57… doesn't have a discID, you might want to try that again
      • 2012-06-01 15340, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Gotcha.
      • 2012-06-01 15343, 2012

      • reosarevok
        And also, should it be "Acappella Company" or "Acappella"?
      • 2012-06-01 15350, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        they're the same.
      • 2012-06-01 15305, 2012

      • reosarevok
        What does this specific record say?
      • 2012-06-01 15306, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Whoever created Acappella linked it to Acappella Company's website and discog.
      • 2012-06-01 15317, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (if they're the same, you should merge the artists, I guess)
      • 2012-06-01 15318, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        *rummage*
      • 2012-06-01 15338, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        (I'm not sure they're the same in all instances. There's a LOT of CD's there. And, these aren't my CD's.)
      • 2012-06-01 15300, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        (But this is about the third, fourth? time I've ripped them for Dad, and I'm determined if I have to do it again I'll have something I can just click a button in.)
      • 2012-06-01 15313, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Disc says The Acappella Company
      • 2012-06-01 15329, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Ok, let's make it consistent then :)
      • 2012-06-01 15335, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I'll do that, it's quicker
      • 2012-06-01 15347, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Okay.. thanks
      • 2012-06-01 15352, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Let me edit the recordings
      • 2012-06-01 15334, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Oh, I just noticed they're actual duplicates :)
      • 2012-06-01 15340, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Not disc 1 and disc 2
      • 2012-06-01 15354, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Then you want to cancel that merge, and do it again using "Merge mediums and recordings" instead
      • 2012-06-01 15319, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (I promise, it gets easier with time ;) )
      • 2012-06-01 15350, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Yeah.. thats why I said I never should have created that one.. lol :)
      • 2012-06-01 15354, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        And yeah.. I can tell it does
      • 2012-06-01 15301, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        honestly he's got some great stuff here
      • 2012-06-01 15317, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Some of it... I'm not a huge fan of.
      • 2012-06-01 15321, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        ;)
      • 2012-06-01 15325, 2012

      • reosarevok
        "Duplicate of http://musicbrainz.org/release/5eb66314-80f4-4ae… but different pressing / disc ID?"
      • 2012-06-01 15300, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Well, if it was a different release, you should keep it. I'm guessing it's not though. In that case you could just cancel http://musicbrainz.org/edit/17830745
      • 2012-06-01 15303, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Since it's still pending
      • 2012-06-01 15314, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (if it had passed, you'd need to merge)
      • 2012-06-01 15328, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        hmm
      • 2012-06-01 15347, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Do I flag overtures as symphonies?
      • 2012-06-01 15354, 2012

      • reosarevok
        You can use Overture ;)
      • 2012-06-01 15359, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Where?
      • 2012-06-01 15307, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Well, if you mean in the work type
      • 2012-06-01 15308, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        I have Symphony, Chamber, and Other.
      • 2012-06-01 15313, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ooooh
      • 2012-06-01 15318, 2012

      • reosarevok
        That's for the type of orchestra
      • 2012-06-01 15326, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ... I usually don't bother to set one
      • 2012-06-01 15335, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        ohh
      • 2012-06-01 15340, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        That'd be a symphony then
      • 2012-06-01 15344, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I guess this is a symphony orchestra and you can set it, yeah
      • 2012-06-01 15355, 2012

      • HazRPG joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15304, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Yes
      • 2012-06-01 15312, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        It's one of the nice ones, too
      • 2012-06-01 15300, 2012

      • reosarevok
        How do I start adding a dancehall record and end up relating works to recordings for some band called "Nunwhore Commando 666"?
      • 2012-06-01 15308, 2012

      • reosarevok grumbles at his ability to lose track of what he was doing
      • 2012-06-01 15354, 2012

      • VxJasonxV
        I know the feeling.
      • 2012-06-01 15348, 2012

      • Kionmaru
      • 2012-06-01 15357, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        I see what you're doing now, that *does* look better/
      • 2012-06-01 15305, 2012

      • reosarevok
        :)
      • 2012-06-01 15310, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        :)
      • 2012-06-01 15311, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Heh
      • 2012-06-01 15316, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        I thought I was just going to rip some stuff
      • 2012-06-01 15322, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Now look at me x.x
      • 2012-06-01 15356, 2012

      • mchou joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15338, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Okay. That gets rid of the dupe.
      • 2012-06-01 15341, 2012

      • jcazevedo joined the channel
      • 2012-06-01 15346, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Now
      • 2012-06-01 15354, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        How do I get picard to figure out that it's not there any more.
      • 2012-06-01 15335, 2012

      • reosarevok
        What do you mean? :)
      • 2012-06-01 15347, 2012

      • Kionmaru
        Well