#musicbrainz

›ï›nï›/quit‚‚‚‚

luks: Sorry Luks I asked something to Voice instead of you yesterday ! Thanks Mineo for letting me know of this github thing, I’ve created a new « issue » https://github.com/lalinsky/acoustid-server/iss...

voiceinsideyou: you can ignore my yesterday’s message ;)

no messages for me? :(

Here is a special message for derwin !

Have a nice day, derwin

awww! thanks!

it's really late here

so I'll take that one for tomorrow morning

good nigth :)

how come you’re a limited user ? http://musicbrainz.org/user/derwin I thought I saw you around from long time already… Maybe your editor name is slightly different ?

I assume that's confusingly someone else

http://musicbrainz.org/user/darwinx0r I think?

oh yeah that's me

ah OK, feels more like it, indeed :)

luks: ping

luks is barely around lately I think

Might be easier to mail him

+1

many ppl looking

no find

Oh ok, I’m always mislead by those empty open IRC “online” accounts :/

I guess the github ticket is engouh anyway :)

ARGH quartets as chamber orchestra

intgr, I was told you're re-adding cover art URLs that were removed because the image is now in the cover art archive - there's no point, and they'll be removed again, *because the image is now in the cover art archive* :)

reosarevok: Erm? What does "is now in the cover art archive" mean and why are they being removed?

You mean you haven't seen the Cover Art tab? :p

No. And the covers weren't visible in the upper right corner either.

Hmm, wait

Ok, my bad, my Firefox extensions screwed things up :)

So now you know

Don't add URLs, upload the images if they're not there :)

Yeah I will in the future, thanks.

It would be cool if the URL relationship had a more visible warning. :)

when choosing cover art rel type

I can't see why the AcoustIDs here were removed, there's no reason it couldn't be normal Hero http://acoustid.org/track/305b5f8d-4f1c-4ccf-a4...

Maybe someone confirmed it with the actual file?

Hmm coudl be

Is there a search option to lookup AcoustIDs that need checking?

This cover art thing is pretty cool. But it sure takes forever for the images to appear.

Does it?

It used to be fairly quick, but maybe they've disabled the thing where the images loaded before we had a thumbnail

(because it made huge files load every time)

http://musicbrainz.org/edit/18571882 5 minutes ago

Oh, might be that they only show thumbnails then, yes

Anybody there?

Since I spoke after you entered, the answer is obviously yes :p

Ha ok I need help..

I in the process of developing my own song recognition app like shazam but different

(well, yes, I know it's hard)

libchromaprint is the only thing you need to know :)

intgr: not really, if he wants fragmentary recognition, isn't it?

ok Im trying to find a company that has the software to create audio tags?

reosarevok: Ah... Well Chromaprint can support that, but AcoustID currently doesn't have the capability to look them up in that fashion

Oh

So maybe you can look into chromaprint after all

Out of my depth :)

:)

thats great, ill have look, thanks!

beatseek: If you're willing to put in some open source development resources, please talk to luks. We'd love to have that support in AcoustID.

"maailm on suur, suurem kui sai, millele määrida moosi" wtf Hando Runnel

Hehe

I mean, I guess it is true, but wtf

Definitely, im still trying to get my head around how shazam exactly works, how it integrates the app into its music database, does it have a data base of actual songs or simply fingerprints, or both? once I figure this out I would be happy to help those who helped me ;-)

beatseek: luks's blog has some good info and references: http://oxygene.sk/lukas/tag/acoustid/

fragmentary recognition would be a killer feature.

but i'm just pointing out the obvious now

Yeah, since shazam's recognition of not-mainstream stuff sucks

probably just feeds from major record labels

I suspect that a factor in that is the relative inefficiency/complexity of indexing and looking up that much data for fuzzy matches.

Can someone verify my recent edit here please? http://musicbrainz.org/recording/9dec7384-43f2-...

Wikipedia shows it as the Metro Mix, the only 4:17 track with this name is the metro mix, I checked from spotify

and if correct, what do I do with r.ships?

'mix' needs to be lowercase, and so does 'metro' if it's not a proper noun

but... i would let the edit pass, and then you can auto-edit that

I shazam uses Itunes for its library, :-(((

auto-edit?

xteejx: some edits are considered simple enough that they are an auto-edit -- meaning there's no voting process

xteejx: changing the case of characters in a title is an auto-edit

ahhhhh ok :)

I'll keep an eye on that one if I remember once the edit goes through in 2 weeks, or I could just canel and change it

if you get enough votes from here it'll pass within the hour

Ok, I'll wait, then if not cancel and change :)

your choice though

yeh. :)

is there a GIST user here ? Who knows it well ?

erm, i use gist

i didn't think there was much to know about it

I used to have 3 public GISTS that were seen in https://gist.github.com/jesus2099 - I added a new public GIST and now this page says I have no public GIST — 

https://gist.github.com/2910665 // https://gist.github.com/3187688 // https://gist.github.com/3188521 // NEW : https://gist.github.com/3227572

After adding the last one, my GIST “profile” became empty… (._.?)

ocharles: do you have an idea ? Is it also empty for you ? Here is a trace of a time when it was not empty http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=...

good old times…

strange

Maybe it will come back at some time…

https://gist.github.com/ocharles i still seem to have stuff, but i usually use private gists

Thanks anyway :)

Trying to add URL http://musicbrainz.org/edit/relationship/create... it tells me "This URL is not allowed for the selected link type, or is incorrectly formatted"