Oh, no, you didn't miss the dot, xchat is just stupid, sorry :)
simukis_
he didn't, your client just didn't link it.
Cuan
The question is: should they be.
simukis_
dot is completely valid character in url
Cuan
Most clients don't parse it at the end because it is also a completely valid sentence delimiter.
It's always awkward to end a sentence with an URL though.
Especially questions.
reosarevok suddenly realises who Cuan is
reosarevok
Seems I'm slow today :)
Cuan suddenly realises his name is different.
ianmcorvidae
limited user wouldn't really matter with that, would it? it doesn't limit editing at all, just voting
Cuan
Hmm, true.
reosarevok
I guess it's better to let them keep using that account, if only because their utter crap is easier to find that way
But argh :(
nano- joined the channel
nikki
I don't understand why people are blindly voting no on all that editor's edits
KRSCuan
I cherry-picked my no votes, though I guess some of the release adds might be okay with fixing.
nikki
some of the release adds I looked at linked to itunes and seemed fine except having the packaging set to jewel case... but still they had two no votes
reosarevok approves and fixes a couple
KRSCuan
Cover art sourced from Wikipedia should generally have better replacements.
I should check the Marina releases.
reosarevok
I didn't look at cover art, but perfectly-sourced release adds with a couple small issues are not a reason to vote No :/
reosarevok grumbles a bit
(not at you)
KRSCuan points at Senax and salo.rock
KRSCuan
Who are not here, it seems.
outsidecontext joined the channel
reosarevok
I don't think they're IRC people
But I suspect Senax is just no-voting everything by the guy
nikki
he said he is
KRSCuan
Dunno.
reosarevok
And salo is just following the no-votes as usually
ianmcorvidae
I've seen salo here occasionally, but
KRSCuan
Somewhat understandable, but still not the best way to deal with dunces.
nikki
I mean, there's plenty of us around, if you think someone's edits need attention, find someone willing to do more than just vote no on everything whether it's right or not :/
I feel like I should go around blindly yes voting on things with no votes just to even up the numbers a bit :P
ianmcorvidae
I've considered doing that before
heh
DocPlatypus joined the channel
KRSCuan
With the recent change to the editing system, three quick nos don't suffice to shoot down an edit. So there's more time to spot those edits and form your own opinion.
Maybe I should bookmark a search for edits with 2+ no votes.
nikki
I'm pretty sure the idea behind changing it wasn't to encourage people to do it even more though :P
praest76 joined the channel
v6lur joined the channel
voiceinsideyou joined the channel
voiceinsideyou joined the channel
reosarevok
v6lur: hmm, you don't happen to know if Metro Luminal are playing anything apart from the two festivals in Tallinn and Pärnumaa this summer, do you?
v6lur
huh? i didn't even know they were playing anything at all!
The little wikipedia preview should skip italic text
ianmcorvidae
the wikipedia preview needs a lot of work
Lotheric
is there a ticket for that?
reosarevok
Lotheric: no, it shouldn't
ianmcorvidae
right now it comes straight from some API they have for mobile stuff, which is what decides what to exclude or not
Lotheric
no?
ianmcorvidae
it should skip links to disambiguation pages, certainly
not *all* italics, presumably :P
reosarevok
Lotheric: wikipedia should use their own fucking templates for that, which are skipped by the API already
reosarevok goes fix this one
Lotheric
:)
ianmcorvidae
reosarevok: it's not by templates, it's literally a list of types of elements to exclude :P
reosarevok
ianmcorvidae: however it works, what I know is that when it's done in the silly real-italics-text it is served, and when it's done properly with a template it's not