label credits are useful for the case where the imprint changes, but they maintain the same artist roster, historical discography, etc.
but not for the case of multiple imprints run by the same company
Vacuity joined the channel
Vacuity_ has quit
Jinx has quit
JoeLlama has quit
Jinx joined the channel
Jinx has quit
d3daim has quit
gnu_andrew has quit
Tykling has quit
lovesegfault has quit
rubdos has quit
Zialus has quit
Rotab has quit
KingJ has quit
Wizzup has quit
atsampson has quit
milkii has quit
fetzerch has quit
Vovven has quit
gnu_andrew joined the channel
Tykling joined the channel
lovesegfault joined the channel
rubdos joined the channel
Zialus joined the channel
Rotab joined the channel
KingJ joined the channel
Wizzup joined the channel
atsampson joined the channel
milkii joined the channel
fetzerch joined the channel
Vovven joined the channel
lovesegfault has quit
lovesegfault joined the channel
elomatreb[m]
When adding relationship to a release that are credited only once per release, is it preferrable to add it to the release credits or to all the recordings on it? Thinking about things like "recorded at"/"mixed by" ones here
reosarevok
elomatreb[m]: all recordings, unless you have a reason to think it doesn't apply to all
Some things (executive producer, for example) make more sense at the release level IMO, but most don't
Jybz joined the channel
CatQuest
[23:21] <reosarevok> My preference is still to use a rel between them
CatQuest has ofcourse argued for that since almost before ngs
Jybz has quit
I actually remember one of my earliest discussions with reosarevok was about "why would you want ta" and I a first missunderstood him
i thought he meant "that's dumb why would you want that" but he actually meant "I don't know why you'd want that, can you explain it please?"
and I remember I thought it was refreshing to meet someone who didn't automatically shoot donw my ideas but was willing to be convinced against what they thought first themselves
loi we where so young :D
[03:51] <kepstin> but not for the case of multiple imprints run by the same company <-- also agree
anyway I'm against merging imprint with the company.
we never know when the company wil create another imprint
CatQuest: I have to go to work now but I'll revert the whole th ing when I get back. It's pointless to try to merge if we can't have label credits on labels (only label relationships)
CatQuest
ja
Lotheric
maybe I'll get some more +1 on my ticket for that though
:P
hehe
CatQuest
dude i already did i think
Lotheric
yeah you did
CatQuest
i've wanted credits on labelssince.. yes
since credits were a thing
Lotheric
I mean from the other participants in the discussion