This treats recordings named "Halcyon" and "Halcyon + On + On" as belonging to the same work
2019-11-13 31752, 2019
ajshell1
Example 2: The Song "Style" has three remixes by them: "Old Style", "New Style", and "Mock Tudor"
2019-11-13 31716, 2019
ajshell1
Each song is treated as a separate work (except New Style, which doesn't have a work of it's own yet), with "Old Style" and "Mock Tudor" being listed as being "based on" the work "Style" https://musicbrainz.org/work/c50bc626-80e1-34d7-b…
2019-11-13 31725, 2019
ajshell1
So? Which method is correct?
2019-11-13 31741, 2019
ajshell1
I plan on fixing all of their works to the proper method, but I need to know which one is the proper one first.
2019-11-13 31749, 2019
kepstin
in general, remixes of modern pop-style music are considered the same work, but if there are any extra credits on the remix (additional composition, lyrics, etc.) then it has to be a new work instead.
2019-11-13 31740, 2019
ajshell1
So, since Orbital aren't classical composers, the method I called "Example 1" is correct, right?
2019-11-13 31706, 2019
ajshell1
Assuming the credits are the same
2019-11-13 31719, 2019
ajshell1
I have another question. It appears that it was a common phenomenon for British electronic bands such as Orbital to release singles in two parts.
Also, the original release of the song "Halcyon", mentioned earlier, was on the "Radiccio" EP. In Europe, it was released in two parts as "Radiccio 1" and "Radiccio 2". In Japan, they were combined and released as "Radiccio". In America, they were combined but instead called "Halcyon"
2019-11-13 31734, 2019
ajshell1
In this case, Discogs lumps all the "Radiccio"s together, but has "Halcyon" as a different release group
2019-11-13 31729, 2019
c1e0_ joined the channel
2019-11-13 31716, 2019
c1e0 has quit
2019-11-13 31704, 2019
c1e0_ has quit
2019-11-13 31700, 2019
Besnik_b has quit
2019-11-13 31708, 2019
KassOtsimine joined the channel
2019-11-13 31719, 2019
AJ_Z0 has quit
2019-11-13 31708, 2019
Birdframe joined the channel
2019-11-13 31701, 2019
AJ_Z0 joined the channel
2019-11-13 31748, 2019
timbl joined the channel
2019-11-13 31734, 2019
chaban has quit
2019-11-13 31719, 2019
ajshell1 has quit
2019-11-13 31742, 2019
chaban joined the channel
2019-11-13 31721, 2019
Birdframe has quit
2019-11-13 31757, 2019
Jybz joined the channel
2019-11-13 31714, 2019
timbl has quit
2019-11-13 31729, 2019
Jybz has quit
2019-11-13 31713, 2019
Jybz joined the channel
2019-11-13 31751, 2019
KassOtsimine has quit
2019-11-13 31739, 2019
Jybz has quit
2019-11-13 31713, 2019
xplt joined the channel
2019-11-13 31717, 2019
Jinx has quit
2019-11-13 31750, 2019
timbl joined the channel
2019-11-13 31730, 2019
Jinx joined the channel
2019-11-13 31731, 2019
m17h joined the channel
2019-11-13 31734, 2019
m17h has left the channel
2019-11-13 31700, 2019
timbl has quit
2019-11-13 31721, 2019
timbl joined the channel
2019-11-13 31726, 2019
iconoclasthero joined the channel
2019-11-13 31740, 2019
iconoclasthero has quit
2019-11-13 31753, 2019
peaveyman has quit
2019-11-13 31728, 2019
peaveyman joined the channel
2019-11-13 31717, 2019
SothoTalKer
reosarevok: why do we cannot add naxosmusiclibrary to the other databases? (:
2019-11-13 31740, 2019
SothoTalKer
would be useful for those with access ;)
2019-11-13 31758, 2019
reosarevok
Isn't it a streaming page more than a database?
2019-11-13 31708, 2019
reosarevok
I don't think there's a reason not to link it as one
2019-11-13 31731, 2019
SothoTalKer
well, but it's not "stream for free"
2019-11-13 31726, 2019
SothoTalKer
they offer covers and booklets, too.
2019-11-13 31719, 2019
SothoTalKer
reosarevok: there's "streaming page" in the list :p
2019-11-13 31734, 2019
SothoTalKer
Hmm. i'm not sure, what NML actually is. They advertise themselves as "Invaluable resource for universities, music schools, public libraries, schools, music professionals and collectors"
