#musicbrainz

hrm, I'm getting "this track's mbid will change when this edit is applied" but the mbid on both sides is the same.

the tracklist was so wrong that I pasted from a better tracklist I had on disk. but it seems to have confused the release editor.

also I would appreciate an approve :D

darwin: the recording gid is the same, but the track one will probably change, because of the re-pasting :)

Anyway, I'd expect that to be the issue

oh, weird, a track mbid?

so... in order to avoid this, I'd have to manually change all track titles? :/

I wouldn't bother tbh

Track MBIDs are nice, but they break often enough

But yes, I think that'd be what you need to do. Or at least the ones different enough from the original

IMO keeping your sanity > track MBIDs

I mean it's a pretty rare case where the whole tracklist is so wrong, in this case missing all the mix clarification information in parens

Yeah

also, any interest in doing the merge?

When I copy-paste from Dicogs track MBIDs won't change.

I copy/pasted from beets's "[p]rint" fwiw

it did a weird thing where I needed to touch every artist too

I didn't like it :/

hi, is this the right place to ask about picard?

when I right click on the album picture of a file it just crashes https://alarmpi.no-ip.org/kamokan/iz

I'm just trying to remove the album picture from a file

zas, outsidecontext: ^

King_DuckZ: can you create a ticket at https://tickets.metabrainz.org/projects/PICARD/ for this? Please provide details about system & Picard version. We are about to release a bugfix-only version, and I guess we can fix this issue before that.

sure

hm I didn't know there was a newer release, it seems gentoo has 2.3.1 marked as unstable, so I'm still at 2.1.3

should I still submit the bug report?

First, try new version, 2.3.1 is stable (and 2.3.2 will come soon to squash down few remaining bugs)

If the issue still happens with 2.3.1, then create a ticket, we'll take care of it before 2.3.2 if needed

kk

2.3.1 is not crashing :)

I'll leave the bug report alone then

hi2all. If a track is a monologue should i use [dialogue] with added spoken vocals or just leave this one person credit as artist?

Darkloke: if you know wh othe person speaking is, I'd say use that as artist

(afaik [dialogue] isa left over from before we could have more than one person on each recording/relese/etc)

I see. Just thought [dialogue] could be a good indication that the track is not a music for example and could be additionally later filtered out in music player.