#musicbrainz

Yegor: The usual convention is to follow the separator used on the cover art (or spine if applicable), or choose one reasonable to you (e.g. a colon) if the title has no explicit separator (e.g. if it's just separated by varying font size or color)

Does anyone see any reason not to add https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/STYLE-348 ? :)

STYLE-348: Add relationship: Musical Quotation/Reference

hello all, i'm sorry, i've bleeped up a release, and totally lost how to fix it

https://www.allmusic.com/album/new-generations-... this is the release, but i can't find it anymore at the s MB site

Hi! I have a style question I couldn’t find an answer to in the guide, maybe some of y’all can help me. I have titles like this: "WIL01 - The Night of Yajnavalkya's Travel", where the artist confirmed to me that "WIL01" is a catalogue number for the track. Does it still belong in the track title? If no, where do I put it?

reosarevok: lmao, i suggested something like STYLE-348 waaay back in the mailinglist day

(safe to say it was throughoutly ignored)

I am ALL for it! (imagine all the rocks songs that "quote" in the hall fo the mountai nking for example? :D awesome!)

STYLE-348: Add relationship: Musical Quotation/Reference https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/STYLE-348

if oy uadd this i can even link bicycle race to fat bottomed girs as ther eis a refrence there .. <3

Jedee2011: If you modified anything you can see what you changed by clicking the "My Data" dropdown near the top of the page and selecting "All my edits"

I found the release, anyway :)

Left a note so they'll find it, now making it CSG

irimi1: I doubt there is a clear-cut answer. If the track titles consistently include the "catalog number" I would be inclined to include them, but there's something to be said for considering just the title the intent of the artist

elomatreb[m]: Well, it’s consistent per release, but varies from release to release. I’d be inclined to leave it out tbh since it seems like extra information to me.

why did the artist decide to include it? Assigning catalog numbers to tracks feels a little strange outside of classical works with opus numbers

By "consistently" I mainly meant "consistent for one release", i.e. do different versions of a release (digital, CD, vinyl, etc.) all do this or just one of them?

I think they are only digital releases. But later ones (and some in between) don’t have catalogue numbers for the tracks.

crism: as our (unwilling) PDQ Bach expert, does the PDQ STYLE-348 example make sense?

STYLE-348: Add relationship: Musical Quotation/Reference https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/STYLE-348

Hello Support Team,

need your help again.

I'm just trying to setup local server using docker.

while running docker compose build, I'm receiving following error....

Step 29/31 : RUN yarn install && yarn cache clean && eval "$(perl -Mlocal::lib)" && /musicbrainz-server/script/compile_resources.sh ---> Running in 302dbf4c74ecyarn install v1.22.5[1/4] Resolving packages...[2/4] Fetching packages...info There appears to be trouble with your network connection. Retrying...info There appears to be

trouble with your network connection. Retrying...info There appears to be trouble with your network connection. Retrying...info There appears to be trouble with your network connection. Retrying...error An unexpected error occurred: "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@babel/helpers/-/helpers-7.10.4.tgz: tunneling socket could not be established,

statusCode=403".info If you think this is a bug, please open a bug report with the information provided in "/musicbrainz-server/yarn-error.log".info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/install for documentation about this command.Service 'musicbrainz' failed to build: The command '/bin/bash -o pipefail -c yarn install && yarn cache clean

&& eval "$(perl -Mlocal::lib)" && /musicbrainz-server/script/compile_resources.sh' returned a non-zero code: 1

any idea what can be issue here?

I'm trying to follow instructions on below url.

apiuser: can you download https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@babel/helpers/-/h... manually?

no. I can't even on host machine.

site can not be reached error.

Then the error is what it is claimed to be: There appears to be trouble with your network connection.

hmmmm.

You should find out why yarnkpkg.com cannot be reached from your host machine.

yes, true. thanks for your help yvanzo :)

I'm looking in the documentation on guidance for "deluxe edition" releases, but am getting confused about where this information should go. I'm seeing releases either including such designations in the release title field itself in parenthesis (extra title information), or in the disambiguation field. What is the preferred method?

Both can be valid, I think the most common way to decide is to see how and if the "Deluxe" part is indicated on the cover

If it's obviously part of the title (e.g. same or similar font and font size), it's usually included, if it's only a minor annotation somewhere or not indicated at all, the disambiguation version is used

elomatreb[m]: Thanks for the feedback.

Is there any guidance as far as capitalization of such designations? Such as "deluxe edition" versus "Deluxe Edition"? For example two releases in this list differ in capitalization usage in their disambiguation: https://musicbrainz.org/tag/remaster/release

This page: https://musicbrainz.org/tag/remaster/release describes some instances of capitalization but it doesn't include examples of titles of albums like deluxe edition, anniversary editions, etc.

I'm not sure, if we apply ETI rules it should be lowercase. You can either do what feels right to you or ask in the forums where more people can respond (https://community.metabrainz.org/)

I'll check it out. Thanks.