Yegor: The usual convention is to follow the separator used on the cover art (or spine if applicable), or choose one reasonable to you (e.g. a colon) if the title has no explicit separator (e.g. if it's just separated by varying font size or color)
Hi! I have a style question I couldn’t find an answer to in the guide, maybe some of y’all can help me. I have titles like this: "WIL01 - The Night of Yajnavalkya's Travel", where the artist confirmed to me that "WIL01" is a catalogue number for the track. Does it still belong in the track title? If no, where do I put it?
Jedee2011 has quit
CatQuest
reosarevok: lmao, i suggested something like STYLE-348 waaay back in the mailinglist day
(safe to say it was throughoutly ignored)
I am ALL for it! (imagine all the rocks songs that "quote" in the hall fo the mountai nking for example? :D awesome!)
if oy uadd this i can even link bicycle race to fat bottomed girs as ther eis a refrence there .. <3
elomatreb[m]
Jedee2011: If you modified anything you can see what you changed by clicking the "My Data" dropdown near the top of the page and selecting "All my edits"
reosarevok
I found the release, anyway :)
Left a note so they'll find it, now making it CSG
elomatreb[m]
irimi1: I doubt there is a clear-cut answer. If the track titles consistently include the "catalog number" I would be inclined to include them, but there's something to be said for considering just the title the intent of the artist
irimi1
elomatreb[m]: Well, it’s consistent per release, but varies from release to release. I’d be inclined to leave it out tbh since it seems like extra information to me.
elomatreb[m]
why did the artist decide to include it? Assigning catalog numbers to tracks feels a little strange outside of classical works with opus numbers
By "consistently" I mainly meant "consistent for one release", i.e. do different versions of a release (digital, CD, vinyl, etc.) all do this or just one of them?
rubdos has quit
livingsilver94_ joined the channel
livingsilver94 has quit
rubdos joined the channel
irimi1
I think they are only digital releases. But later ones (and some in between) don’t have catalogue numbers for the tracks.
MajorLurker has quit
MajorLurker joined the channel
Gazooo794 has quit
Gazooo794 joined the channel
tn54214 joined the channel
reosarevok
crism: as our (unwilling) PDQ Bach expert, does the PDQ STYLE-348 example make sense?
I'm just trying to setup local server using docker.
while running docker compose build, I'm receiving following error....
Step 29/31 : RUN yarn install && yarn cache clean && eval "$(perl -Mlocal::lib)" && /musicbrainz-server/script/compile_resources.sh ---> Running in 302dbf4c74ecyarn install v1.22.5[1/4] Resolving packages...[2/4] Fetching packages...info There appears to be trouble with your network connection. Retrying...info There appears to be
trouble with your network connection. Retrying...info There appears to be trouble with your network connection. Retrying...info There appears to be trouble with your network connection. Retrying...error An unexpected error occurred: "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@babel/helpers/-/helpers-7.10.4.tgz: tunneling socket could not be established,
statusCode=403".info If you think this is a bug, please open a bug report with the information provided in "/musicbrainz-server/yarn-error.log".info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/install for documentation about this command.Service 'musicbrainz' failed to build: The command '/bin/bash -o pipefail -c yarn install && yarn cache clean
&& eval "$(perl -Mlocal::lib)" && /musicbrainz-server/script/compile_resources.sh' returned a non-zero code: 1
Then the error is what it is claimed to be: There appears to be trouble with your network connection.
apiuser
hmmmm.
yvanzo
You should find out why yarnkpkg.com cannot be reached from your host machine.
supersandro2000 has quit
supersandro2000 joined the channel
apiuser
yes, true. thanks for your help yvanzo :)
sublim20 joined the channel
rdswift joined the channel
apiuser has quit
d4rkie has quit
Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
livingsilver94_ has quit
livingsilver94 joined the channel
user384536 joined the channel
user384536
I'm looking in the documentation on guidance for "deluxe edition" releases, but am getting confused about where this information should go. I'm seeing releases either including such designations in the release title field itself in parenthesis (extra title information), or in the disambiguation field. What is the preferred method?
Glassjoe joined the channel
elomatreb[m]
Both can be valid, I think the most common way to decide is to see how and if the "Deluxe" part is indicated on the cover
If it's obviously part of the title (e.g. same or similar font and font size), it's usually included, if it's only a minor annotation somewhere or not indicated at all, the disambiguation version is used
user384536
elomatreb[m]: Thanks for the feedback.
Is there any guidance as far as capitalization of such designations? Such as "deluxe edition" versus "Deluxe Edition"? For example two releases in this list differ in capitalization usage in their disambiguation: https://musicbrainz.org/tag/remaster/release
This page: https://musicbrainz.org/tag/remaster/release describes some instances of capitalization but it doesn't include examples of titles of albums like deluxe edition, anniversary editions, etc.
elomatreb[m]
I'm not sure, if we apply ETI rules it should be lowercase. You can either do what feels right to you or ask in the forums where more people can respond (https://community.metabrainz.org/)