Jozo: I do not, I did just some CD TOC related edits + some smaller corrections… no cover art to check, unfortunately
2013-05-24 14438, 2013
SultS_
if the cover art is correct though, I could easily get a larger one :P
2013-05-24 14448, 2013
SultS_
(and I think it is)
2013-05-24 14458, 2013
Jozo
SultS_: Oh. I hate when there is popular ablum that noone seems own. :/
2013-05-24 14429, 2013
SultS_
go buy it :)
2013-05-24 14452, 2013
Jozo
SultS_: I can wait until it's available on my local library (and its may be cutted down covers :/)
2013-05-24 14448, 2013
JoeLlama joined the channel
2013-05-24 14427, 2013
SultS_
not sure if we would even get the same version they sell in finland
2013-05-24 14441, 2013
Jozo
SultS_: Yeah. I just worried digipak and normal edition cover arts...
2013-05-24 14404, 2013
Jozo
SultS_: And It's ok me to add some cover art what feels correct... But now added cover art is so poor quality
2013-05-24 14437, 2013
Jozo
Mut maybe noone caras
2013-05-24 14447, 2013
Jozo
s/caras/cares/
2013-05-24 14441, 2013
SultS_
Jozo: well the cover art it’s probably *not* from the actual CD… more likely found from the internet and belongs to a downloadable release… CD version would probably not have equal dimensions
2013-05-24 14413, 2013
Jozo
When our cover art add edits 10% is wrong, 10% is maybe wrong, 20% is so bad quality
2013-05-24 14416, 2013
SultS_
I think it would be valid reason to vote no, if you think it’s for a downloadable release instead
2013-05-24 14455, 2013
SultS_
I don’t even like OK quality, when good quality is so easy to find
2013-05-24 14433, 2013
SultS_
it’s not like we have to worry about storage space
2013-05-24 14453, 2013
hawke_1
I am always torn when I have a digital download cover art file that exactly matches the CD…
2013-05-24 14409, 2013
Jozo
(I'm also uploaded many so bad quality images.... and some images what I'm not sure)
2013-05-24 14411, 2013
hawke_1
It seems silly to go through the lossy print/scan process rather than just uploading the original file
2013-05-24 14436, 2013
Jozo
I always upload itunes profided image to CD release when it matches to release... (And there is so much release where I do not do that)
2013-05-24 14440, 2013
SultS_
I think uploading downloadable release cover art is sometimes justifiable… as long as it matches the CD
2013-05-24 14402, 2013
SultS_
…and preferably no actual CD cover art to upload instead
2013-05-24 14405, 2013
jcazevedo joined the channel
2013-05-24 14415, 2013
SultS_
well, not preferably
2013-05-24 14441, 2013
SultS_
isn’t itunes cover art relatively low quality as well?
2013-05-24 14431, 2013
Jozo
SultS_: Pretty good quality... usually 1200x1200, somedays upscaled on earlier releases
2013-05-24 14435, 2013
nikki
I think it's acceptable if it matches, it's not like we can't delete it if we get something better
2013-05-24 14445, 2013
nikki
most of the stuff I see is 600x600 and the 1200x1200 ones are just upscaled
2013-05-24 14414, 2013
SultS_
ugh…
2013-05-24 14419, 2013
Jozo
I have one CD release what I have to use discogs images, cos itunes provided is so clear
2013-05-24 14417, 2013
Jozo
nikki: I do not usually compare 600 vs 1200. But 1200 is better most of digital releases releases in recent years
2013-05-24 14420, 2013
SultS_
I use a software to find me the best / most correct match :)
2013-05-24 14442, 2013
Jozo
SultS_: What software?
2013-05-24 14455, 2013
SultS_
Album Art Downloader (windows)
2013-05-24 14407, 2013
nikki
Jozo: I usually look for fuzzy bits and usually find some, so then I use the 600x600 one
2013-05-24 14414, 2013
SultS_
it searches most known databases and more
2013-05-24 14438, 2013
Jozo
nikki: I use download speed indicator... itunes is slow when I request 1200x1200 image ad its (not available)
2013-05-24 14405, 2013
nikki
that would mean paying attention when opening it :/
2013-05-24 14401, 2013
SultS_
offtopic conspiracy theory: new google maps doesn’t seem to work in firefox… coincidence? I think not…
2013-05-24 14407, 2013
hawke_1
You know what would be cool? a userscript that organized the works recordings list into a sortable table…
2013-05-24 14448, 2013
nikki
somewhere I had a branch that put them in a table
2013-05-24 14416, 2013
reosarevok
you know what would be cool? the guy who decided all municipalities in Slovenia would get ISO codes falling off a cliff
2013-05-24 14428, 2013
nikki
haha
2013-05-24 14435, 2013
nikki
is that your way of telling me to stop being distracted? :P
2013-05-24 14445, 2013
Jozo
hawke_1: Sortable? I like see release date first
2013-05-24 14449, 2013
reosarevok
No, but this is: stop being distracted! :p
2013-05-24 14455, 2013
reosarevok
nikki ^ :p
2013-05-24 14422, 2013
hawke_1
Jozo: that’d be nice too
2013-05-24 14427, 2013
Jozo
hawke_1: and something similar what SHS do
2013-05-24 14432, 2013
hawke_1
SHS?
2013-05-24 14453, 2013
Jozo
hawke_1: SecondHandSongs
2013-05-24 14410, 2013
hawke_1
Jozo: for my purpose (finding classical recordings which don‘t have correct performer artists set), sortable columns would be better though
2013-05-24 14434, 2013
Jozo
hawke_1: 'cos recording date is much much difficult to determine than release year
2013-05-24 14452, 2013
hawke_1
Jozo: It depends…sometimes recording date is easier.
2013-05-24 14444, 2013
hawke_1
Jozo: some genres (classical a lot of the time, and most discographies of early 78s have recording session info but not release dates
2013-05-24 14441, 2013
Jozo
hawke_1: And on pop-albums you never know when they are recorded
2013-05-24 14403, 2013
hawke_1
Jozo: not true at all…just that you need to use different sources.
2007-2012 could mean 'all were recorded in 2007, shelved for awhile and then edited further in 2012' or it could mean 'track 1 was recorded 2007, track 17 was recorded 2012' — it’s still the best info we have. Maybe another release will give us better info (I have had that happen in fact)
2013-05-24 14424, 2013
hawke_1
nikki: umm…?
2013-05-24 14434, 2013
nikki
hawke_1: I have no idea what you wanted then
2013-05-24 14440, 2013
hawke_1
nikki: that, but sortable, I think.
2013-05-24 14449, 2013
hawke_1
the table part seems fine
2013-05-24 14449, 2013
nikki
right, so along those lines :P
2013-05-24 14406, 2013
nikki
we don't have much sorting at all, but adding sorting with a userscript would be pretty easy afaik
2013-05-24 14417, 2013
nikki
(whereas converting the existing one means creating the table in the first place)
2013-05-24 14430, 2013
hawke_1
It would probably want a date column as well.
2013-05-24 14435, 2013
Jozo
hawke_1: I do not still want guess... Or I do not want add info what is propably wrong
2013-05-24 14458, 2013
nikki
hawke_1: I see a date column...
2013-05-24 14407, 2013
hawke_1
Oh, just blank. :-D
2013-05-24 14410, 2013
nikki
exactly :P
2013-05-24 14420, 2013
nikki
presumably you have some better example you could look up
2013-05-24 14420, 2013
Jozo
hawke_1: Same applies to "instruments performed" on that albums...
