#musicbrainz

because feat. is arguably more common than featuring

I already added the RG and dind't think there was going to be no tracklist.

and takes less sapce

space

that's.. not really a good reason thoguh. if it is on the cover with "featuring"

ten... shouldn't we use "featuring"?

it's not like there's any difference

(note I am not trying to start somerthing, i am simply asking)

same with vol and volume actually@

I've always thoguht it weird that always expand. and ho "if it's swedish hen it's volym" and if it s so and so it gets volumen, volym etc

hva heter det på norks igjen

norks

norsk

it's volum in norsk too

yes

volum, not volume

true

but how t oknow the releases meant volum or volume in norsk? it might go either way with soem artists

i mean if several rel-releases get it strange

thne it shoudl be standardised

CatCat: well I'd say it depends if the title is norsk or not

ja jøss, men du vet noen er sånn "ladedida norsk title, volume seven!"

jeg velger å ikke tenke på slike problem ;)

well since there are no options on that I'm guessing I better remove the RG

so unles it is clearly stated to be volume or volym or whatever. thne i think probably having it as on cover.. for the release title

but the release group alwaysstandardised i'd say

tri_marianaaf: searching, but haven’t found no tracklist for If the Stars… yet :)

SultS : thanks :) yes, I've been trying for the last 15 minutes or so

but you could add the itunes version for Morceau Subrosa at least (if you haven’t already)

already have

http://musicbrainz.org/edit/18074266 - will keep on searching

nex week though

aren’t empty release groups now removed automatically?

Wizzcat: apropos.. hadde du hørt om Dr Seuss før liksom.. jeg vet ikke nå?

SultS: not yet I think

so mde lager alle n filmer med horton og hvem og lorax og katten i støvlene

I think it releases next week

ah, ok then :)

det er hvist en stor greie i statene men jeg hadde ike hørt om det/han? før 3 år siden og sånt

CatCat: hadde hørt om han ja, uten at jeg har lest noen av bøkene

dr seuss.. feels so weird to me, becasue ot all? americans it's like.. "common childhood knowledge" but to this norwegian dude that is me it's liek "lol what's this new thing"

veldig populære barnebøker

tydligvis

men jeg føler at jg får det in med feil ende så og si

how is msuic soundtrack thing guidelines btw, is it stil composer?

cause maybe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lorax_(film)#M...

shoudl it be moved to composer or what i don't know

btw Wizzcat ville likt dsin imput på http://musicbrainz.org/edit/17958565

likt din*

og http://musicbrainz.org/edit/17996479

there's an RFC for soundtrack, you should check there

ehhhh..

SultS: I'm not sure. so should I cancel the remove edit so there's no failed edit?

tri_marianaaf: I don’t think there’s not right or wrong way here… I just think that maybe it’s not worth removing the RG if the tracklist appears sometime next week… but the edit shouldn’t fail without votes

but if it removed automatically the edit will fail, right?

another doubt: http://www.amazon.com/The-Love-feat-Alexis-Jone... would you guys credit the producer? it's on the cover rapper big pooh x illmind featuring alexis jones

tri_marianaaf: There’s nothing wrong with a failed edit, really.

tri_marianaaf: I would guess automatic removal would not affect release groups that has open edits releated to it

and that too what hawke_ said

Both hawke_1 and (probably) SultS are right, yeah

And I would probably use Rapper x Producer feat. Guest there

CatCat: I have that with Norwegian culture..

Kardamommeby? Va er det?

Do Fingerprints recognize different mastering?

I don't even spell it correctly...

derr84: Usually not

derr84: If the remaster is actually a remix, then sometimes.

ok thank you all

and will credit the producer, since it's on the cover (on the other doubt)

derr84: usually 'remasters' don't really have very much difference at all; mostly just volume changes. The acoustid algorithm is designed to filter that kind of minor difference out, so that different encodes of the same track (e.g. low quality mp3 vs. flac) will match the same.

Anyone know if there have been any issues with the MB users list recently?

kepstin-work: but they may be merged, aren't they?

derr84: remasters shouldn’t be merged.

Anyone have any ideas how to handle the works for disc two of http://www.discogs.com/Barry-Gray-Space1999-Yea... ?

I got started a couple of times, but I can’t figure out how best to proceed.

hmm, in many cases remasters should be merged, imo

simply because you can't tell them apart...

only certain distinctive remasters (e.g. the new beatles remasters) should be separate, imo.

kepstin-work: Define “tell them apart” though

kepstin-work: If you can’t hear the change but can see it in a spectogram…

hawke_1: two tracks that aren't credited as "remasters" but have been mastered on two different cds will look different in a spectrogram.

Not necessarily

well, less often nowadays, but I have a lot of tracks that are like that.

kepstin-work: An MP3 will also look different from a flac in a spectrogram too. My point was just that there is no definite point at which it’s “different enough”

And so officially we say “remasters shouldn’t be merged”

So anyone have any idea on that Space: 1999 soundtrack?

God damn I wish we had a way to sort by cat. no.

by *normalized* cat no that is

sort everything. why not?

?

…I’m just trying to find a release on Silva Screen Records. The cat numbers are completely inconsistently formatted: Some are “FILMCD xxx, some are “FILM CD xxx”, some are “FILMCDxxx”

why is every table not sortable? I don't understand. they should be)

I thought it had something to do with the pagination system sucking

yes. load all table - it should be, too

hawke_1: Doesn't the advanced catno: search use normalised cats?

reosarevok: I don’t know. I wasn’t trying to search for it.

I know

Just suggesting it might help

:)

Also, search results for releases don’t return the cat no.

Someone is wrong: http://beta.musicbrainz.org/release/13cb6e35-5e... http://beta.musicbrainz.org/release/b4df3b65-21...

Should the inner tray liner be type: 'spine' since it includes the inner spine?

I think I’ll merge to the 1992 release date

since Silva Screen was founded in 1986

normalised cats

wait, no…

merge

since the original release had 8 tracks

rargerage. why can't i link http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ケロロ軍曹_(アニメ)#1st.E3... to the release?

In am sick of figuring it out, here it is someone do it for me please before i break my face trought the computer http://musicbrainz.org/release/1b23350c-fa14-4c...

hawke_1: I meant use the catno:XXXXX option in advanced search

CatCat: because wiki links go on release groups?

(I mean, I assume that's the issue you're talking about)

reosarevok: Yes, but the results list doesn’t say what the cat. nos. on the found releases are

Oh

...

That's sad

So I still have to go through the list

It’s a smaller list, I guess

reosarevok: Any idea on whether 'tray' images should be type: spine?

Hmm

I guess not

Since you don't see the spine

you see the inner spine though

the other side of the spine

(what people would call a spine, I mean - if you use spine for back of spine, then you should use back for tray :p)

(please don't)

hehe

I don’t/won’t/wouldn’t.

but yeah, that’s a good point

Feels strange though to treat the back and the spine as three separate 2-dimensional things but then treat the tray as a single 3-dimensional thing when it’s the same piece of paper

tray spine

can we add tray/inlay soon

I hope so

I want 'liner' first. :-)

or 'sleeve'

what?

for records