aren’t empty release groups now removed automatically?
2012-06-22 17458, 2012
CatCat
Wizzcat: apropos.. hadde du hørt om Dr Seuss før liksom.. jeg vet ikke nå?
2012-06-22 17413, 2012
reosarevok
SultS: not yet I think
2012-06-22 17419, 2012
CatCat
so mde lager alle n filmer med horton og hvem og lorax og katten i støvlene
2012-06-22 17420, 2012
reosarevok
I think it releases next week
2012-06-22 17428, 2012
SultS
ah, ok then :)
2012-06-22 17427, 2012
CatCat
det er hvist en stor greie i statene men jeg hadde ike hørt om det/han? før 3 år siden og sånt
2012-06-22 17415, 2012
Wizzcat
CatCat: hadde hørt om han ja, uten at jeg har lest noen av bøkene
2012-06-22 17422, 2012
CatCat
dr seuss.. feels so weird to me, becasue ot all? americans it's like.. "common childhood knowledge" but to this norwegian dude that is me it's liek "lol what's this new thing"
2012-06-22 17423, 2012
Wizzcat
veldig populære barnebøker
2012-06-22 17429, 2012
CatCat
tydligvis
2012-06-22 17453, 2012
CatCat
men jeg føler at jg får det in med feil ende så og si
2012-06-22 17435, 2012
CatCat
how is msuic soundtrack thing guidelines btw, is it stil composer?
there's an RFC for soundtrack, you should check there
2012-06-22 17442, 2012
hawke_1 joined the channel
2012-06-22 17449, 2012
CatCat
ehhhh..
2012-06-22 17423, 2012
tri_marianaaf
SultS: I'm not sure. so should I cancel the remove edit so there's no failed edit?
2012-06-22 17419, 2012
SultS
tri_marianaaf: I don’t think there’s not right or wrong way here… I just think that maybe it’s not worth removing the RG if the tracklist appears sometime next week… but the edit shouldn’t fail without votes
2012-06-22 17422, 2012
tri_marianaaf
but if it removed automatically the edit will fail, right?
tri_marianaaf: There’s nothing wrong with a failed edit, really.
2012-06-22 17435, 2012
SultS
tri_marianaaf: I would guess automatic removal would not affect release groups that has open edits releated to it
2012-06-22 17454, 2012
SultS
and that too what hawke_ said
2012-06-22 17400, 2012
reosarevok
Both hawke_1 and (probably) SultS are right, yeah
2012-06-22 17418, 2012
reosarevok
And I would probably use Rapper x Producer feat. Guest there
2012-06-22 17420, 2012
MJ
CatCat: I have that with Norwegian culture..
2012-06-22 17444, 2012
MJ
Kardamommeby? Va er det?
2012-06-22 17438, 2012
derr84
Do Fingerprints recognize different mastering?
2012-06-22 17444, 2012
MJ
I don't even spell it correctly...
2012-06-22 17455, 2012
hawke_1
derr84: Usually not
2012-06-22 17403, 2012
hawke_1
derr84: If the remaster is actually a remix, then sometimes.
2012-06-22 17420, 2012
tri_marianaaf
ok thank you all
2012-06-22 17456, 2012
tri_marianaaf
and will credit the producer, since it's on the cover (on the other doubt)
2012-06-22 17440, 2012
voiceinsideyou joined the channel
2012-06-22 17456, 2012
ruaok joined the channel
2012-06-22 17432, 2012
kepstin-work
derr84: usually 'remasters' don't really have very much difference at all; mostly just volume changes. The acoustid algorithm is designed to filter that kind of minor difference out, so that different encodes of the same track (e.g. low quality mp3 vs. flac) will match the same.
2012-06-22 17436, 2012
adhawkins joined the channel
2012-06-22 17400, 2012
adhawkins
Anyone know if there have been any issues with the MB users list recently?
2012-06-22 17438, 2012
derr84
kepstin-work: but they may be merged, aren't they?
I got started a couple of times, but I can’t figure out how best to proceed.
2012-06-22 17416, 2012
kepstin-work
hmm, in many cases remasters should be merged, imo
2012-06-22 17424, 2012
kepstin-work
simply because you can't tell them apart...
2012-06-22 17441, 2012
kepstin-work
only certain distinctive remasters (e.g. the new beatles remasters) should be separate, imo.
2012-06-22 17459, 2012
hawke_1
kepstin-work: Define “tell them apart” though
2012-06-22 17400, 2012
v6lur joined the channel
2012-06-22 17416, 2012
hawke_1
kepstin-work: If you can’t hear the change but can see it in a spectogram…
2012-06-22 17450, 2012
kepstin-work
hawke_1: two tracks that aren't credited as "remasters" but have been mastered on two different cds will look different in a spectrogram.
2012-06-22 17404, 2012
hawke_1
Not necessarily
2012-06-22 17423, 2012
kepstin-work
well, less often nowadays, but I have a lot of tracks that are like that.
2012-06-22 17407, 2012
hawke_1
kepstin-work: An MP3 will also look different from a flac in a spectrogram too. My point was just that there is no definite point at which it’s “different enough”
2012-06-22 17420, 2012
hawke_1
And so officially we say “remasters shouldn’t be merged”
2012-06-22 17450, 2012
hawke_1
So anyone have any idea on that Space: 1999 soundtrack?
2012-06-22 17449, 2012
_flow_ joined the channel
2012-06-22 17412, 2012
hawke_1
God damn I wish we had a way to sort by cat. no.
2012-06-22 17418, 2012
hawke_1
by *normalized* cat no that is
2012-06-22 17407, 2012
derr84
sort everything. why not?
2012-06-22 17433, 2012
hawke_1
?
2012-06-22 17419, 2012
hawke_1
…I’m just trying to find a release on Silva Screen Records. The cat numbers are completely inconsistently formatted: Some are “FILMCD xxx, some are “FILM CD xxx”, some are “FILMCDxxx”
2012-06-22 17412, 2012
derr84
why is every table not sortable? I don't understand. they should be)
2012-06-22 17420, 2012
Leftmost joined the channel
2012-06-22 17448, 2012
hawke_1
I thought it had something to do with the pagination system sucking
2012-06-22 17431, 2012
hawke_1 lols at the acoustid-fingerprinter manual
2012-06-22 17427, 2012
derr84
yes. load all table - it should be, too
2012-06-22 17432, 2012
reosarevok
hawke_1: Doesn't the advanced catno: search use normalised cats?
2012-06-22 17451, 2012
hawke_1
reosarevok: I don’t know. I wasn’t trying to search for it.
2012-06-22 17409, 2012
reosarevok
I know
2012-06-22 17414, 2012
reosarevok
Just suggesting it might help
2012-06-22 17415, 2012
reosarevok
:)
2012-06-22 17445, 2012
hawke_1
Also, search results for releases don’t return the cat no.
hawke_1: I meant use the catno:XXXXX option in advanced search
2012-06-22 17435, 2012
reosarevok
CatCat: because wiki links go on release groups?
2012-06-22 17406, 2012
reosarevok
(I mean, I assume that's the issue you're talking about)
2012-06-22 17427, 2012
hawke_1
reosarevok: Yes, but the results list doesn’t say what the cat. nos. on the found releases are
2012-06-22 17433, 2012
reosarevok
Oh
2012-06-22 17434, 2012
reosarevok
...
2012-06-22 17437, 2012
reosarevok
That's sad
2012-06-22 17445, 2012
hawke_1
So I still have to go through the list
2012-06-22 17451, 2012
hawke_1
It’s a smaller list, I guess
2012-06-22 17428, 2012
hawke_1
reosarevok: Any idea on whether 'tray' images should be type: spine?
2012-06-22 17442, 2012
reosarevok
Hmm
2012-06-22 17447, 2012
reosarevok
I guess not
2012-06-22 17451, 2012
reosarevok
Since you don't see the spine
2012-06-22 17408, 2012
hawke_1
you see the inner spine though
2012-06-22 17414, 2012
hawke_1
the other side of the spine
2012-06-22 17416, 2012
reosarevok
(what people would call a spine, I mean - if you use spine for back of spine, then you should use back for tray :p)
2012-06-22 17430, 2012
reosarevok
(please don't)
2012-06-22 17446, 2012
hawke_1
hehe
2012-06-22 17451, 2012
hawke_1
I don’t/won’t/wouldn’t.
2012-06-22 17415, 2012
hawke_1
but yeah, that’s a good point
2012-06-22 17424, 2012
jesus2099 joined the channel
2012-06-22 17419, 2012
hawke_1
Feels strange though to treat the back and the spine as three separate 2-dimensional things but then treat the tray as a single 3-dimensional thing when it’s the same piece of paper
