#musicbrainz

oc lin kfor pokemon.. hang a sec

I mean, it's pokemon! Who could *not* be into it?

i know right!

my initial comment was "It's a bout fuckin time!!" lol

_5moufl: what's your browser, maybe mbz doesn't like it...?

fx4

weird

CatCat: I heard you (I think it was you) were having trouble with the timeline graph page; if you're interested the most recent comment on http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-2689 has a userjs file that makes it work

ianmcorvidae: how's that country page going?

reosarevok: ready to be merged next time ocharles appears

:)

http://codereview.musicbrainz.org/r/1321/ :)

(not that anything there beyond the title will necessarily be of any interest to you, but :P)

but yeah, looks like this week's contributions are the artist country page and copyable URLs

Now we only need to add support for the Archbishopric of Salzburg!

once whatever ISO standard we use supports it :P

aww

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicesters... wtf "Leicester City Council 'not ready' for zombie attack"

lol I saw that

WHATISTHATAHANDHELDWII???!! $if2(%albumartist%,%artist%) -

WHATISTHATAHANDHELDWII???!! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_onl...

CatCat: you mean the Wii U controller?

It's some kind of tablet-controller but there's a full console too

the one in the picture

I see just a video there, no pictures

But yeah, the new Nintendo console has a "handheld console" as controller

huh

CatCat: slightly on topic: http://www.cad-comic.com/cad/20110608

LOL

reosarevok, interesting

Wow! Double rainbows!

Hi

I have a problem with musicbrainz.org, I hope someone can help me

"Track 96 has an invalid length. Must be in the format MM:SS"

Hmm

The name of the track is Example 17.1

"Example 17.1"

Have you tried the Advanced tracklist?

17.11

It might work better there

I guess the software assumed 17.11 was the time...

It did

So, yes, I am now in advenced

I can change the title of the track, but not the lenght of the track

when I click on it, nothing happens

And what does it say? 17.11?

yes

Go back to the basic tracklist, delete the 17.11

(leave just "example")

And maybe that will let you fix it :/

this is useless

almost all track of the disk are called Example

If I don't write the number of the example, copying the "guitar improvisation for dummy" cd has no more sens

What I mean is

96. Example 17.1 - Antoine polin

Delete it in the basic one

that's what I read on the left side of the basic editor now

And go to the advanced

And try to change it there

Ok

I don't know if I'm the only one here, but the new basic brainz is REALLY slow

Not to load, but every time I edit with the "basic editor", it takes long time before I see the edit done

especially on this cd with 96 tracks !

google chrome often ask me if I want to close the tab

oh, hey, you can set the type of a work to "song" now :)

there's nothing, not even descriptions, of the work types afaik

So

What's a "song"?

anything that's sung?

nah. couldn't be that easy.

no, it doesn't help, the time has not disappeared from the advenced editor

and I still see the same error message

:/

How many tracks are there?

caller_6: we have Aria

but is an aria a sub-type of song?

reosarevok: if you speak to me, there are 96 tracks

So this is the only one?

Pfft

*only->last

Then you could try to remove it in the advanced tracklist and re-add it from there

now, they are 4 with troubles

Anyway, you should go to tickets.musicbrainz.com and add a ticket describing your problem

most are example xx.aa-bb , but those four are only xx.aa

(so the devs can look into it and try to solve it)

:(

I don't even know how to begin to describe how to reproduce the trouble, I have tried too much things before coming here

you know, I think musicbrainz is the only publicly available database that provides a relation between ISRC and ISWC identifiers.

That's a bit sad

People who do have all that info won't display it and we users have to go collecting it ourselves…

reosarevok: don't y ou meant tickets.musicbrainz.org (and not com)

Pfft

Sure I do

Wow! Double rainbows!

I really. REALLY wish that reference was put away

"rain bow" is such a common used word it just gets lame

imho

gonna be 10 million autoedits on them from me :/

can't be worse than my email today

gaaaah

I already hate this packaging field

people are just either assuming everything is a jewel case, or using other for everything even when it's a normal jewel case

needs more style guidelines

... or something

like people read them

most people just fill in fields, submit it and never respond to questions