#musicbrainz

ocharles, were edit cancels instantaneous now?

(well, or anyone else who knows and is around)

If they are, then we should remove "to be cancelled" from the statistics...

yeah, I dunno if that actually worked

I feel like I remember it not working for some reason, and the "to be cancelled" state still existing

of course things get cancelled pretty fast anyway, the statistic is usually 0

Track 6 of http://musicbrainz.org/release/678b91d1-2ca2-41... is /weird/

it seems to consist of various chunks of recorded vocals which were then scrambled

I'm currently trying to figure out what its relation to the original version of the song is supposed to be

and failing.

oh, I see. it's an extract from a section of the middle of the song with the instrumentals and foreground vocal removed

well, if there was ever a call for "partial performance of" :)

would it be stretching "remix" too far?

it's not a remix, it's just one of the tracks not mixed in with the rest of the song.

this song also has credits for "Drums & Percussion, Toy Piano & Programming"

hmm. the other song on this single has a credit for "Fog."

which is an abbreviation... for what?

toy piano!

naturally, for the track which has the "EOG only" version, the EOG is credited.

hey everyone ! I have a question, can I send a query in php to musicbrainz like this one for example: "colplay yellow" without specifically identifying the artist nor the track title and get the correct info for the song from musicbrainz ?

No.

yay, 2/3 of my filed bugs are like.. resolved?

arsenik13: You could do an advanced query: http://musicbrainz.org/search?query=%22yellow%2...

Any AEs about that can approve http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14968403?

debian testing has Picard 0.11?

Debian has never claimed to be a bleeding edge distro

Focus is on stability

reosarevok: within which apt repo?

adhawkins, I know, and I didn't expect it to be in Stable

But I kinda hoped testing to have something less than 2 years old

It depends if the maintainer of the package is still 'active' I guess

The maintainer of libmb3 isn't for example, so if I want libmb4 in Debian I'll probably have to do it myself

Muz, what you mean with which repo?

Testing, .ee if that matters but I imagine it shouldn't

reosarevok: are you referring to the official Debian apt repositories?

Yeah

apt-cache madison picard

That'll tell you what versions are in which apt repo.

0.11-2.1+b2 on testing/main i386

Trolling much?

!

ah there are more

please vote! http://musicbrainz.org/artist/a9bff0b2-400d-43d...

Hell yes, Modern Talking videos on TV

FFS remember that old thing that was changed in the thing so with various artists in release editor we talked about

well becasue of that change i have ot do it all by hand here

instead of just editign the artist once

GOD

YOU GUYS, yea you CODER GUYS. STOP CHANGING THINGS THAT WORK :(((

Hmmm, in theory that should work fine just editing the artist...

i had to try doing it twice

it was a serious pita

and imagine someone who is "dr foo" as a release artist, but on the track he migt go as "dr foobar" and "dr guyface"

.. i don't know

anyway vote on my casetterubbish edits! :p

do people agree that "secondhandsongs.com" should be in the sidebar?

what is that?

CatCat: let's make a deal: I need to submit some ISRCs of which I know some are wrong, so I'll open edits to remove them immediately. you vote on them, I vote on your edits :D

you honestly shouldn't submit the wrong ones

but it's easier to just put in the cd, submit all including the wrong ones and delete the 3 wrong ones :(

i don't know anything about isrcs

or I could just pause my submit script and edit cdrdaos output, hmmm

man I wish i could batch split these rtecordings man http://musicbrainz.org/artist/bb8df32a-cb97-402...

Mineo, couldn't you just edit the script so it asks before sending?

why are they merged?

what ?

oh

I got confused

I thought that's a recording page listing all the different tracks as belonging to the recording

nope

its a bloody pain in the ass page listing a lot of work to do

reosarevok: it does ask, but try spotting mistakes if it's 23 lines of $isrc $mbid :D

I'd wait for the "split artist" edit

ja

any eta on that?

I think that ocharles has it working, so probably soon

today woudl be cool :P

CatCat: please test it on http://test.musicbrainz.org :)

ja jøss ok

it needs a few tweaks

oh?

It's in the wrong place in the sidebar, and it allows you to use the same artist within the artist credits, which I'm not sure we do or don't want

Which makes it an "edit artist credit" edit type, which luks was saying would be a good idea

I just didn't call it that, because I couldn't think of a sensible way to display it all

i honestly think it's a good place for it. since (atleast now) i nthe beginning

it's not that different from th "merge artists" edit type if you make it to change artist credits

we are going to want an easy palce to cliki it first

luks: not sure I follow

I mean you have no display of what's going to be changed when merging artists