VxJasonxV: did you get any of the replies you needed for the Bandcamp relationship?
2011-05-27 14734, 2011
rodrigo
hey, i'm needing a help
2011-05-27 14700, 2011
rodrigo
i downloaded the database dumps, and need to import them into a postgres database
2011-05-27 14748, 2011
rodrigo
i'm using the scripts in your git to create the tables and such
2011-05-27 14709, 2011
rodrigo
but the script does not create the tables i need
2011-05-27 14740, 2011
reosarevok
rodrigo: you might get help more quickly in #musicbrainz-devel
2011-05-27 14758, 2011
rodrigo
ok, thanks
2011-05-27 14727, 2011
_bibi joined the channel
2011-05-27 14734, 2011
_bibi has left the channel
2011-05-27 14721, 2011
lugo joined the channel
2011-05-27 14755, 2011
ocharles
nikki: I'm still having difficulty tracking that bug down, but it appears the cookie gets cleared. very strange
2011-05-27 14709, 2011
JAMy joined the channel
2011-05-27 14755, 2011
davitf_ joined the channel
2011-05-27 14750, 2011
vaguerant joined the channel
2011-05-27 14748, 2011
vaguerant
Dremora, you around currently, wanted to ask about your foobar MB component quickly.
2011-05-27 14726, 2011
_Dave_ joined the channel
2011-05-27 14750, 2011
ijabz joined the channel
2011-05-27 14701, 2011
_Dave_ joined the channel
2011-05-27 14757, 2011
wpl joined the channel
2011-05-27 14734, 2011
gridaphobe joined the channel
2011-05-27 14715, 2011
davitf_ joined the channel
2011-05-27 14747, 2011
Dremora
vaguerant: yep, I'm here
2011-05-27 14730, 2011
vaguerant
I was just wondering if you had any interest in adding check boxes for all the tags you're sourcing from MB, e.g. Total tracks, Band, Composer, etc.; personally I only use a few tags--artist, album, track, title, date. Obviously I can remove them myself after grabbing tags from MB, but it'd be nice to just ignore those tags I don't need from the outset.
2011-05-27 14703, 2011
Dremora
actually I was thinking about it, so yes
2011-05-27 14743, 2011
vaguerant
Great, I'll look forward to it. Only just grabbed the extension, already makes things infinitely more convenient, so my thanks.
(I'm assuming you were referring to the bandcamp status update reosarevok was asking about earlier today)
2011-05-27 14730, 2011
Vorpal joined the channel
2011-05-27 14740, 2011
VxJasonxV
correct
2011-05-27 14744, 2011
VxJasonxV
the answer is no
2011-05-27 14720, 2011
VxJasonxV
Last I heard, ruaok was going to get in touch with them directly. Between that and a lack of answer from the respective individuals (e.g. Bandcamp), I have backed off.
2011-05-27 14703, 2011
warp
ok, that makes sense.
2011-05-27 14732, 2011
hawke_ joined the channel
2011-05-27 14721, 2011
hawke_
(feat.) should be moved to collaboration artist credits now, right?
2011-05-27 14730, 2011
ijabz joined the channel
2011-05-27 14753, 2011
warp
hawke_: depends.
2011-05-27 14756, 2011
reosarevok joined the channel
2011-05-27 14727, 2011
warp
hawke_: there was some opposition to removing the featuring artist style guideline, so that guideline is unchanged, but only applies to recordings.
2011-05-27 14718, 2011
EM3RY
uhh, what is the guideline with feat. in a title?
2011-05-27 14719, 2011
warp
and the track should be as on cover, so if the cover has (feat. foo), that should be retained in the track title.
2011-05-27 14729, 2011
EM3RY
oh
2011-05-27 14740, 2011
hawke_
So basically “no”?
2011-05-27 14728, 2011
warp
hawke_: no, unless the backcover tracklisting does not have (feat. foo) where our database entry does have it.
