#musicbrainz

/

      • GURT
      • 2006-05-04 12401, 2006

      • malverian joined the channel
      • 2006-05-04 12426, 2006

      • malverian
        is there no accoustic fingerprinting/analysis process that is fully open sourced? From reading the wiki I have gathered that generating PUIDs is completely closed source process?
      • 2006-05-04 12421, 2006

      • mudcrow
        MusicDNS do all the PUID generating. thats closed source
      • 2006-05-04 12412, 2006

      • malverian
        mudcrow, There is no open source alternative for such a need?
      • 2006-05-04 12425, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i'm confused
      • 2006-05-04 12431, 2006

      • flamingcow
        musicdns.org talks about open source
      • 2006-05-04 12438, 2006

      • flamingcow
        and musicbrainz
      • 2006-05-04 12428, 2006

      • mudcrow
        the analysing part is closed source.
      • 2006-05-04 12455, 2006

      • mudcrow
        I dont know of any other that is open source, ruaok is the one to ask about that
      • 2006-05-04 12442, 2006

      • flamingcow
        odd
      • 2006-05-04 12445, 2006

      • flamingcow
        so there's a client library
      • 2006-05-04 12451, 2006

      • flamingcow
        and it talks to a closed server?
      • 2006-05-04 12414, 2006

      • malverian
      • 2006-05-04 12430, 2006

      • malverian
        Apparently TRM was a closed source processa lso.
      • 2006-05-04 12431, 2006

      • malverian
        *also
      • 2006-05-04 12437, 2006

      • malverian
        This FDMF is apparently open source.
      • 2006-05-04 12453, 2006

      • flamingcow
        malverian: i did some tests with FDMF myself
      • 2006-05-04 12458, 2006

      • flamingcow
        the false positive rate was ridiculous
      • 2006-05-04 12432, 2006

      • malverian
        Hmm...
      • 2006-05-04 12447, 2006

      • malverian
        The fingerprinting idea is such a good one..
      • 2006-05-04 12457, 2006

      • malverian
        I just hate to think it's bound to some closed source server staying "free"
      • 2006-05-04 12422, 2006

      • GURT
        thanks mud
      • 2006-05-04 12430, 2006

      • mudcrow
        no prob. gurt
      • 2006-05-04 12454, 2006

      • flamingcow
        there's a whole bunch of gpl source in this musicdns lib
      • 2006-05-04 12403, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i'm trying to figure out where it talks to something proprietary
      • 2006-05-04 12419, 2006

      • malverian
        flamingcow, Well the closed source portion is apparently the part where it talks to the server and says "generate a PUID from this music signature"
      • 2006-05-04 12430, 2006

      • flamingcow
        ah, ok
      • 2006-05-04 12436, 2006

      • flamingcow
        same degree of lame
      • 2006-05-04 12439, 2006

      • malverian
        Yeah.
      • 2006-05-04 12405, 2006

      • malverian
        It seems like an unacceptable sacrifice..
      • 2006-05-04 12414, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        so write something better
      • 2006-05-04 12417, 2006

      • malverian
        When FDMF could be improved instead.
      • 2006-05-04 12438, 2006

      • malverian
        flamingcow, Did you mess around at all with the fuzziness options in FDMF?
      • 2006-05-04 12447, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i honestly don't remember
      • 2006-05-04 12451, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i really should've written it up
      • 2006-05-04 12456, 2006

      • flamingcow
        if you'd like to prep a test plan
      • 2006-05-04 12405, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i have an enormous music corpus to run it over
      • 2006-05-04 12457, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i don't understand the willingness to use inferior software simply because it's free
      • 2006-05-04 12414, 2006

      • flamingcow
        because you can improve it
      • 2006-05-04 12414, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        what's the problem with something that's closed source, or partly closed source, if it's the best thing going
      • 2006-05-04 12415, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, Because at any moment musicdns could close their servers to us and we would be left with nothing.
      • 2006-05-04 12417, 2006

      • flamingcow
        instead of getting stuck with trm
      • 2006-05-04 12420, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        no, they couldn't
      • 2006-05-04 12424, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        you didn't read the agreement
      • 2006-05-04 12427, 2006

      • flamingcow
        and having to throw out everything and having to start over
      • 2006-05-04 12457, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, There are many reasons. If you really want to know what they are, read up on the many pages that explain the benefits of open source.
      • 2006-05-04 12402, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i understand open source
      • 2006-05-04 12404, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i work for red hat
      • 2006-05-04 12413, 2006

      • flamingcow
        so, you don't understand open source
      • 2006-05-04 12417, 2006

      • flamingcow
        you work for redhat :-P
      • 2006-05-04 12421, 2006

      • malverian chuckles.
      • 2006-05-04 12423, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i'm not an ideological nut
      • 2006-05-04 12435, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, So what stops MusicDNS from going out of business and their servers going offline?
      • 2006-05-04 12450, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        if the best tool for the job isn't open source, either write something bettter, or quit whining
      • 2006-05-04 12458, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, I think you're not being considerate of the potential for disaster in putting all your eggs in one basket.
      • 2006-05-04 12422, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, I think we're being perfectly constructive by discussing other alternatives.
      • 2006-05-04 12425, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        the general sentiment that everything that's not open source is evil is idiotic
      • 2006-05-04 12447, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, I didn't say it was evil. I said it is an unacceptable risk.
      • 2006-05-04 12418, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        did you even read the agreement mb and musicip have?
      • 2006-05-04 12440, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, Do you understand that MusicIP could go out of business?
      • 2006-05-04 12453, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, You have refused to acknowledge that concern.
      • 2006-05-04 12405, 2006

      • malverian
        Little paper agreements do not magically save a company from bankrupcy.
      • 2006-05-04 12415, 2006

      • malverian
        If the server costs become too much, etc.
      • 2006-05-04 12455, 2006

      • malverian
        flamingcow, Anyway. There is a good wiki article that I linked earlier where the author seemed to have good results with FDMF
      • 2006-05-04 12419, 2006

      • flamingcow
        right
      • 2006-05-04 12427, 2006

      • malverian
        flamingcow, I'm considering emailing the author of the program and asking him what he thinks of his algorythm working with MB.
      • 2006-05-04 12427, 2006

      • flamingcow
        and i'm trying to figure out why mine so blatantly disagree
      • 2006-05-04 12435, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i was working with 20k lossless files
      • 2006-05-04 12441, 2006

      • flamingcow
        and had thousands of false "matches"
      • 2006-05-04 12458, 2006

      • malverian
        flamingcow, Hmm.. Perhaps something to do with the fuzziness that is used by default. Were you using an older version perhaps?
      • 2006-05-04 12410, 2006

      • flamingcow
        this was more than 6 months ago, so almost certainly :)
      • 2006-05-04 12431, 2006

      • malverian
        flamingcow, I will try some of my own tests. I have about 12,000 lossy files that I could test on..
      • 2006-05-04 12438, 2006

      • malverian
        Probably 200-300 duplicates.
      • 2006-05-04 12457, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i'll rerun with the current version
      • 2006-05-04 12418, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        * Other projects that wish to integrate fingerprinting services into their applications will need to sign up with the MusicDNS service. This service is free for non-profit projects (musicdns.org) and price-tiered for commercial projects such that even small startups have access. For more details, please visit MusicDNS.org.
      • 2006-05-04 12421, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        * $10,000 held in escrow for MusicBrainz, plus contractual commitment to supply hardware resources should MusicIP exit the fingerprinting business. This is designed to allow us to continue the service should they decide to stop providing the service.
      • 2006-05-04 12425, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        * a 10% cut on all income earned from fingerprinting queries where MusicBrainz metadata is provided via the MusicDNS service.
      • 2006-05-04 12428, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        * 800K acoustic fingerprint ids (PUIDs) that which are already loaded into our DB.
      • 2006-05-04 12429, 2006

      • GURT
        hmm.. i click on edit all for an album, paste a list of track times into the parser, parse the times, click continue, and then it say there were no changes made
      • 2006-05-04 12457, 2006

      • mudcrow
        check the times are in the correct format 1:30 and not 1.30 or 1,30
      • 2006-05-04 12401, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, Interesting.
      • 2006-05-04 12406, 2006

      • GURT
        yes they are mudcrow
      • 2006-05-04 12415, 2006

      • GURT
        is it because the album has a discID?
      • 2006-05-04 12433, 2006

      • mudcrow
        ah yeas, you cant enter times if it has a DiscID
      • 2006-05-04 12434, 2006

      • flamingcow
        is there a contractual guarantee that the access for nonprofits will always be free?
      • 2006-05-04 12447, 2006

      • GURT
        ah.. the warning/error message dosen't say that
      • 2006-05-04 12452, 2006

      • GURT
        "Adding, removing and renumbering of tracks disabled because of valid Disc ID(s)"
      • 2006-05-04 12411, 2006

      • mudcrow
        (and track times)
      • 2006-05-04 12422, 2006

      • malverian
        ojnkpjg, Does the agreement say that they will hand over the proprietary PUID generation stuff as well?
      • 2006-05-04 12433, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i don't know, you'd have to ask ruaok
      • 2006-05-04 12437, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        or research it
      • 2006-05-04 12446, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        that was what he posted initially
      • 2006-05-04 12452, 2006

      • mudcrow
        but the track times should be correct if the release has the correct disc id. give or take a few seconds
      • 2006-05-04 12455, 2006

      • GURT
        hmm
      • 2006-05-04 12419, 2006

      • GURT
        when i edit it one at a time the time box is disabled but still white.
      • 2006-05-04 12432, 2006

      • GURT
        so theres no way to apply times to an album with a discID?
      • 2006-05-04 12404, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        move the discid :)
      • 2006-05-04 12410, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        change times, then move it back
      • 2006-05-04 12422, 2006

      • flamingcow
        ojnkpjg: which redhat office are you out of?
      • 2006-05-04 12426, 2006

      • GURT
        ehh.. i'd have to wait for votes
      • 2006-05-04 12428, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        westford
      • 2006-05-04 12446, 2006

      • flamingcow
        interesting; i know a bunch of people there, who have no idea who you are :)
      • 2006-05-04 12450, 2006

      • GURT
        times can't be generated from discID?
      • 2006-05-04 12453, 2006

      • mudcrow
        does it have just one disc id gurt? and how big are the time differences?
      • 2006-05-04 12459, 2006

      • GURT
        yeah one..
      • 2006-05-04 12402, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        that's because nobody would know me as ojnkpjg
      • 2006-05-04 12403, 2006

      • GURT
        i dont know the differences
      • 2006-05-04 12407, 2006

      • GURT
        gotta go LSOT is on
      • 2006-05-04 12409, 2006

      • GURT
        LOST even
      • 2006-05-04 12410, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        who do you know there
      • 2006-05-04 12432, 2006

      • flamingcow
        caillon, pookstar, ajax, and the formers n and clee
      • 2006-05-04 12442, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        real names?
      • 2006-05-04 12415, 2006

      • flamingcow
        chris aillon, maureen duffy, adam jackson, dan reed and chris lee
      • 2006-05-04 12427, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i don't know them
      • 2006-05-04 12433, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        which groups are they in
      • 2006-05-04 12440, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        i've only been there a little more than a month
      • 2006-05-04 12412, 2006

      • flamingcow
        i think chris and maureen are desktop
      • 2006-05-04 12415, 2006

      • flamingcow
        adam's "the X guy"
      • 2006-05-04 12403, 2006

      • flamingcow
        you're cluster & storage?
      • 2006-05-04 12407, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        yep
      • 2006-05-04 12424, 2006

      • flamingcow
        heh, and "the pork guy" ? :)
      • 2006-05-04 12428, 2006

      • ojnkpjg
        yes
      • 2006-05-04 12432, 2006

      • flamingcow
        cool
      • 2006-05-04 12413, 2006

      • SenRepus joined the channel
      • 2006-05-04 12453, 2006

      • wolfmunch
        wolfmunch is now known as wolfsong13
      • 2006-05-04 12452, 2006

      • demonhunter has quit
      • 2006-05-04 12422, 2006

      • futurist joined the channel
      • 2006-05-04 12447, 2006

      • pjo joined the channel
      • 2006-05-04 12452, 2006

      • pjo
        Hello
      • 2006-05-04 12405, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        hi
      • 2006-05-04 12408, 2006

      • pjo
        Is Nyght there ?
      • 2006-05-04 12416, 2006

      • pjo
        hi
      • 2006-05-04 12423, 2006

      • Nyght
        I am pjo, how are you!
      • 2006-05-04 12430, 2006

      • pjo
        I tried MoodLogic
      • 2006-05-04 12449, 2006

      • pjo
        My WIndows went totally crashed and now reinstalling
      • 2006-05-04 12452, 2006

      • Nyght
        wolfsong13: I haven't seen you in irc lately. I wanted to say thank you fro the support with the automoderator electtion!
      • 2006-05-04 12403, 2006

      • Nyght
        Oh, I'm so sorry!
      • 2006-05-04 12421, 2006

      • Nyght
        I have never tried moodlogic because MusicIP has done everything I need.
      • 2006-05-04 12426, 2006

      • wolfsong13
        :-) you deserver it
      • 2006-05-04 12441, 2006

      • pjo
        I tried MoodLogic for Jazz.mp3
      • 2006-05-04 12453, 2006

      • wolfsong13 hasn't ever had a MoodLogic crash
      • 2006-05-04 12454, 2006

      • Nyght
        I can understand your try.
      • 2006-05-04 12400, 2006

      • pjo
        It returned some trumpetter, I remember Clifford
      • 2006-05-04 12424, 2006

      • pjo
        nyght do you think that is #I remember Clifford" ?
      • 2006-05-04 12445, 2006

      • Nyght
        I asked Yllona to try and id the jazz snipet. She said she thought it was very similar to Sanborn as well, and she also will be giving it to one or another to see their thoughts as well.
      • 2006-05-04 12453, 2006

      • futurist has quit
      • 2006-05-04 12416, 2006

      • Nyght
        I will look that up and see what I can find. Have you searched amazon to see if there's sound clips there to hear if they're similar
      • 2006-05-04 12424, 2006

      • pjo
        thanks much beth
      • 2006-05-04 12453, 2006

      • pjo
        How do I search for the unknown song in amazon ?