dmp_panda now shuts the fuck himself and grabs yetr another coffee :D
2006-09-08 25143, 2006
nightgroove
o_O
2006-09-08 25150, 2006
nightgroove
but it shows as ä jo?!
2006-09-08 25102, 2006
Freso
nightgroove: It does. Because of MB's parser.
2006-09-08 25105, 2006
nightgroove goes to make some tea
2006-09-08 25112, 2006
nightgroove
I only have until 8:40
2006-09-08 25116, 2006
nightgroove
so I'm late late late
2006-09-08 25132, 2006
Freso
nightgroove: As I said, it's been discussed somewhere, and consensus was to use URL encoded URIs.
2006-09-08 25135, 2006
nightgroove
bblater in the day guys
2006-09-08 25115, 2006
Freso
(I was of the oppinion to use ä instead of %C3%A4 initially as well.)
2006-09-08 25139, 2006
Freso
(Which will also be seen from some of my earlier WP article linkings.)
2006-09-08 25158, 2006
Schika
cya nightgroove !
2006-09-08 25112, 2006
dmp_panda
bonne journée le chat ;)
2006-09-08 25138, 2006
dmp_panda
Schika: I can't think about the difference between "compose" and "write". To me, it looks the same... and I guess I'll have a lot of difficulties to use one or the other for stuff like free-jazz... how would you phrase the difference?
2006-09-08 25103, 2006
Schika
maybe someone wrote the notes and such - and some other composed the instrumentation
2006-09-08 25113, 2006
dmp_panda
mmmm... I guess I need a wikipedia reading session...
2006-09-08 25142, 2006
Schika
or another idea the song was original written by artist a (written by) and artist B made a "cover" of it with other instruments (composed by)?
2006-09-08 25156, 2006
toxickore has quit
2006-09-08 25153, 2006
Schika
another idea... artist a wrote the song and sold it to artist b, who finaly made the song
2006-09-08 25105, 2006
dmp_panda
nasty artists :P
2006-09-08 25136, 2006
dmp_panda
anyhow, IMO we lack an essential concept in MB: compositions (or tunes), which really are not the same thing as tracks...
2006-09-08 25112, 2006
dmp_panda
I'm struggling with Jazz compositions been played hundred of times...
2006-09-08 25125, 2006
dmp_panda
we sure don't want a composer to compose a tune hundred of times, do we?
2006-09-08 25124, 2006
dmp_panda
not to mention "cover" is deeply inadequate to depict the fact somebody do interpret a (jazz) composition...
2006-09-08 25113, 2006
Schika
you mean that we should set the AR one time and this AR apply for all tracks with the same name and artist?
2006-09-08 25143, 2006
Freso
Okay. The shower thing.
2006-09-08 25155, 2006
dmp_panda
I don't know... but take the example of Take the "A" Train, composed by Ellington, and played by a huge number of different artists...
2006-09-08 25155, 2006
Freso
I'll be back in the eve!
2006-09-08 25117, 2006
Freso
Take care, and don't miss me ((too) much)! :D
2006-09-08 25125, 2006
dmp_panda
ciao Freso
2006-09-08 25127, 2006
dmp_panda
do we really want each track be composed by Ellington? (~+400 hundred)
2006-09-08 25130, 2006
Freso has quit
2006-09-08 25159, 2006
dmp_panda
or do we really want the very first "Take the..." to be "covered" 400 hundred times?
2006-09-08 25138, 2006
dmp_panda
so yes, I really wish we add "entities" for compositions.
2006-09-08 25152, 2006
dmp_panda
and we may link tracks to the corresponding composition
2006-09-08 25107, 2006
dmp_panda
IMO, this is what we already (sometime) do when we use the first appearance of the tune as a track, and when we use covers AR to it, but it's awkward... and prone to errors... how do we know what is the very first recorded appearance of old tunes?
2006-09-08 25113, 2006
dmp_panda
that's random thoughts... I'm not sure this is clear... but I've seen alarming edits already that makes me think we might end up with a nice mess of anarchic and multiple composed by / covered by....
2006-09-08 25125, 2006
dmp_panda
people want "composed by" for all the tracks of their album. Nice thing. But they don't want to check/verify ASCAP. And they don't mind if we end-up with artist cluttered with hundreds of "identical" AR "composed by"...
2006-09-08 25155, 2006
Schika
I see what you mean ...
2006-09-08 25125, 2006
dmp_panda
*sigh*
2006-09-08 25127, 2006
dmp_panda
:p
2006-09-08 25136, 2006
Schika
;)
2006-09-08 25114, 2006
dmp_panda
When one thinks there are "alarming" edits, one sure needs to take a break from MB :D
2006-09-08 25109, 2006
dmp_panda
That said... /me goes back tidying the horribly messed Edith Piaf ;)
2006-09-08 25107, 2006
hopphopp_ joined the channel
2006-09-08 25104, 2006
AMurderofCrows has quit
2006-09-08 25131, 2006
AMurderofCrows joined the channel
2006-09-08 25133, 2006
AMurderofCrows
AMurderofCrows is now known as mudcrow
2006-09-08 25158, 2006
hawke joined the channel
2006-09-08 25146, 2006
Schika is going to make coffee (addicted)
2006-09-08 25137, 2006
hopphopp_ has quit
2006-09-08 25106, 2006
hopphopp_ joined the channel
2006-09-08 25145, 2006
nightgroove
!away: bah! skole!
2006-09-08 25101, 2006
hopphopp_ has quit
2006-09-08 25129, 2006
Shepard` joined the channel
2006-09-08 25111, 2006
VxJasonxV
Anybody think they could help me get picard working on Linux?
2006-09-08 25121, 2006
VxJasonxV
I'm using the musicbrainz overlay in Gentoo, so I have all the deps
2006-09-08 25130, 2006
dmp_panda
I add it work (debian sid)
2006-09-08 25132, 2006
VxJasonxV
but whenever I go to start it, I get a traceback ending in: ImportError: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_gizmos-2.6.so.0: symbol _ZNK11wxClassInfo8IsKindOfEPKS_, version WXU_2.6 not defined in file libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0 with link time reference
2006-09-08 25155, 2006
dmp_panda
mmm...
2006-09-08 25122, 2006
VxJasonxV
I've tried re-emerging wxGTK (the package that owns that file), even changing some of the use flags, no dice :/
2006-09-08 25104, 2006
dmp_panda
what version of wxgtk2 is that exactly?
2006-09-08 25110, 2006
VxJasonxV
2.6.3.2
2006-09-08 25150, 2006
dmp_panda
kay... who is maintaining tge Gentoo overlay? I guess he would be of more use than me :/
2006-09-08 25156, 2006
dmp_panda
s/tge/the
2006-09-08 25103, 2006
VxJasonxV
I... don't remember their name. I think I can find it though
2006-09-08 25119, 2006
VxJasonxV
juffo?
2006-09-08 25122, 2006
VxJasonxV
name found familiar?
2006-09-08 25152, 2006
dmp_panda
no :(
2006-09-08 25107, 2006
dmp_panda
but intgr more :)
2006-09-08 25156, 2006
dmp_panda
I don't know if he comes on irc though
2006-09-08 25106, 2006
VxJasonxV
I've seen him around
2006-09-08 25127, 2006
dmp_panda
I guess he's your best shot. Just curious: do you use a stable profile?
2006-09-08 25109, 2006
VxJasonxV
reasonably
2006-09-08 25117, 2006
dmp_panda
lol
2006-09-08 25118, 2006
VxJasonxV
I don't rice out my gentoo, if that's what you're asking :-)
2006-09-08 25125, 2006
VxJasonxV
2006.1/x86, -O2 -pipe
2006-09-08 25158, 2006
dmp_panda
I don't throw you the stone, going unstable/experimental may be fun for breakfast ;)
wrong studio, wrong date, wrong producer, wrong info on tracy pew and wrong tracklisting
2006-09-08 25113, 2006
mudcrow
hi panda
2006-09-08 25141, 2006
Schika
"never mind the bollocks..." :D
2006-09-08 25101, 2006
mudcrow
the first sentence is correct, none of the others are...
2006-09-08 25118, 2006
dmp_panda
lol - sometimes, I don't even understand why wikipedia persist on maintaining their own data rather than sourcing it from MB...
2006-09-08 25158, 2006
mudcrow
I love this "Richard Mazda has claimed that his dedication and perseverance played a major role in the album's sound, and it's completion" he engineered two tracks, hardly a major role :)
about half of my archive is mb tagged, the other half is a mess
2006-09-08 25146, 2006
FauxFaux
Dump them all on Picard? It won't go nuts, I promise! ;)
2006-09-08 25150, 2006
VxJasonxV
HA
2006-09-08 25105, 2006
dmp_panda
makes me think I may even have files that make picard crash :p
2006-09-08 25121, 2006
Schika
i'm on linux
2006-09-08 25131, 2006
luks
FauxFaux: that's exactly what i'm working on :)
2006-09-08 25134, 2006
luks
you can put them all to picard and let it do it's job
2006-09-08 25146, 2006
luks
it will be a little more automated than simply puid lookups
2006-09-08 25156, 2006
Schika
Fedora Core 3
2006-09-08 25143, 2006
FauxFaux wonders if I'll ever put the effort in such that I'll be able to hit the "move to folders/filenames baesd on tags" and there won't be any collisions or files left.
2006-09-08 25157, 2006
VxJasonxV
luks: I'm up for testing, btw
2006-09-08 25148, 2006
Schika
^^ me too :P
2006-09-08 25125, 2006
Kanmu joined the channel
2006-09-08 25117, 2006
xxxx
xxxx is now known as deadchip
2006-09-08 25134, 2006
BrianG
me three
2006-09-08 25148, 2006
deadchip
and me four
2006-09-08 25159, 2006
BrianG
i one a sandbox
2006-09-08 25144, 2006
deadchip
you dem man who speak wit da sensi
2006-09-08 25107, 2006
deadchip
one day i'll be able to sort out my downloads folders with either picard or bmp
2006-09-08 25116, 2006
deadchip
stuff like finding duplicates requires 2 pass
2006-09-08 25124, 2006
BrianG
i eight a sandbox
2006-09-08 25129, 2006
deadchip
i mean now speaking all the legal issues of downloading aside, let's just say it happened
2006-09-08 25139, 2006
deadchip
and you have 4 duplicates of
2006-09-08 25144, 2006
deadchip
lol BrainzBot
2006-09-08 25146, 2006
deadchip
BrianG*
2006-09-08 25159, 2006
deadchip
and you have 4 dupes of a file, with a different filename, and slightly different tags
2006-09-08 25112, 2006
deadchip
then it requires a first-pass-run to find the fingerprint, retag them identically
2006-09-08 25116, 2006
deadchip
and then a 2nd pass to remove all the duplicates
2006-09-08 25101, 2006
deadchip
stuff like that is what i'm going to do coz i have dem dupliceeats too much, oh jah
2006-09-08 25136, 2006
deadchip
i have probably 20 times "Karen Ramirez - Looking For Love}|
