#musicbrainz

g0llum|school: that cd index is invalid because it contains the data track.

it should be removed and the album merged

so what? it describes the fact that this cd has a data track

if it was at the beggining, yes

but not

the data is the 2nd session on the cd

ok. i'll change my vote

thank you :p

for a minute there I thoguh *i* did soemthign wrong

yeah, they can be confusing :)

:)

_mo: when the index has gone. put in the data track delete and the merge. no need to wait for the data track to be deleted first

obviously post the mod links here

ja

on the merge, put a note saying the data track delete is in progress with a link to it :)

usually I do, in case the oen goes trough before the other and causes mayhem, but because I got el voting staffhere on irc I can do it :)

am I the only person who thinks that two ending )) are ugly even if they are 'tecnically' correct?

I would just either amke them seperate or leave it

that mod is not correct

thought so

the feat. should be outside the other parens

whenever I need (something in pparantesis (inside paranthesis) I always ommit the last one (or add another oen at the end)

(like (maybe) so)

never (like (maybe so))

)) is UGLY

and surely not a lisp programmer :)

eh?

o_O

are you making lew comments about my sexual orientation? ´o_O`

heh. this is some lisp code:

(switch-to-buffer (other-buffer)))

aha

MPH!

>_<

the other oen has CD ids see

so I cant merge them until that track goes byebye

luks_ is now known as luks

great.. I have to wait another hour >_<

I think the word is "bollocks"

nope, you're not missing it. It doesn't exist :)

bye!

yeah that's the problem :)

have to click edit for every single track just to correct the case -.-

I think the reason it doesn't exist is because nobody has coded it yet

eponae is now known as epoaway

Daedalus- is now known as Daedalus

Shepard: I've left a few notes on your Andrews Sisters mods :)

are you sure about this?

pretty sure yup

ok

cause then I have to change some other tracks :)

sorry :)

np should be correct :)

it's always worth doing a quick check on one of the other databases. allmusic does make some mistakes, but most of the time it is pretty good

ok finished with them

yes!

anone think the last track on this is datatrailing? http://musicbrainz.org/album/e8794014-1b9f-444e...

yup

epoaway is now known as eponae

xchatuser002 is now known as tumlexchat

tumle2 is now known as tumle

Telle|away is now known as Telle

other opinions please: http://musicbrainz.org/showmod.html?modid=2872272

leave as is, add Junkie XL and Elvis as members of the collaboration via AR would be my preference

hmmmm

but seriusly

Junkie XL never met Elvis in real life, did he?

I get very confused with weather pseudo artists should exist or not

always ami for feat Is what I say

unless the artist *spesifically* intended and its a valid bogus artist name

:p

not helpful with other words

heh

I kinda feel I should delete my mod

and do it bit by bit

wich ones?

oh that

you're numfrjey

?

aha

hum

well I don't know

anything that gets rid of feat. presents or vs' artist is a good thing with me :)

think I will go and have BBQ and sort it out later

heh lol

clash- is now known as clash

_mo: in that case it was a previously unreleased Elvis track, it just happened that the only version that was eventually released was remixed by JXL

hmh

then it soudl be under elvis and have 'JXL' remix i nthe title

yup, which is what I put on the mod notes

I can automod them if you like?

it's not that simple though

nj?

nj?

I think it should be investigated / discussed more before it is automod'ed

aright

note that many of the tracks have 'JXL remix' tacked on to them already

yes! I was going to check who it was attributed to when it was released. I think it was Elvis, but let me check

even if it wasn't, if elvis was the artist, then elvis was the artist. JXL needs to be credited for his remix, surly

, but yea

there's a single that was put under the Elvis vs JXL I thought

but

what does 'vs' mean in this?

does it mean they went up o na stage ans fought it down rapper style? no

o.O does vs normally mean that?

was either a quest singer on the others track album+ no

I dunno

it doesn't on any of the vs style collaborations I've ever heard ^^;

typical: from the official uk charts:

SEARCH RESULTS

1. Elvis vs JXL:

A Little Less Conversation (22/6/2002)

it means either remixed feat or 'and'

somewhere between "remixed" and "and" in this case

true vs is somethign esle than alot of stuf with vs artist currently i nthe DB

I vote for tackign JXL remix and crediting him with an ART.. altough.. do whe ave a 'remixed' AR?

but that's not what it was released under at all. Both members of a a collaboration have to be aive and present for it to be one?

at the tiem oif the colab, definitly

how can someone be i na band togeter if at the tiem of band existance, one is *dead*?

because previously recorded sessions exist