Rainy and cold are my favorite. Mostly, though, I want to explore some of the music if I can.
2017-07-15 19643, 2017
MajorLurker
Picard experts, I had to reload my computer. Have re-installed picard (latest) but it is not showing the "Add cluster as a release" on a right click. It is showing it as installed though, any thoughs?
They're all self-releases, so it makes sense to me that it'd be the label, since it's the guy's company. Just like to make sure.
2017-07-15 19625, 2017
Leftmost
Thanks, Caller.
2017-07-15 19635, 2017
CallerNo6
Too bad there aren't generic "entities".
2017-07-15 19655, 2017
CatQuest
hibiscuskazenothere: no idea
2017-07-15 19629, 2017
CatQuest
+1 CallerNo6
2017-07-15 19641, 2017
CallerNo6
Oh, I shouldn't have said "the only way", since there's an artist-release "copyright" too.
2017-07-15 19601, 2017
CallerNo6
but if I had to choose, that seems more like a label than like a person.
2017-07-15 19631, 2017
CatQuest
I think we need a new entitiy "company" OR that "label" could have type "company"
2017-07-15 19642, 2017
CatQuest
I've come across a probme lie kthis too myself
2017-07-15 19615, 2017
Leftmost
Yeah. It makes the most sense to me to have it under the same umbrella as major labels, since it strikes me as a "release label", as nebulous as that concept is.
is that close enough to make them two releases of a release group?
2017-07-15 19612, 2017
SothoTalker_
i say yes
2017-07-15 19658, 2017
CallerNo6
+1
2017-07-15 19648, 2017
kepstin
I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to reprint it but no longer had rights to one of the tracks or something, yeah.
2017-07-15 19613, 2017
CallerNo6
There can be regional differences in licensing too.
2017-07-15 19626, 2017
RavenWorks
yeah I'm wondering what happened, maybe there was a sample that turned out to be something offensive in another language...
2017-07-15 19659, 2017
rdswift
Release groups often have slight differences in tracks, so I think this is a perfect case for merging the release groups.
2017-07-15 19618, 2017
CallerNo6
With compilations, it's a fair question, since there might be unrelated comps called "best of <foo>" with mostly the same tracks.
2017-07-15 19600, 2017
kepstin
https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/8dec8546-f7… is an interesting case of the sample clearance issue - one of the tracks on the original release was replaced, and the album re-released (confusingly, with the same catalogue number)
2017-07-15 19614, 2017
RavenWorks
oh yeesh!
2017-07-15 19643, 2017
RavenWorks
ok, here's an unrelated question:
2017-07-15 19627, 2017
RavenWorks
so there's a kinda weirdly-titled album series that goes like "Moz-Art presents Mysterious Traveller: Afroart"
2017-07-15 19643, 2017
albertus1 has quit
2017-07-15 19604, 2017
RavenWorks
I had entered that as "Moz-Art (artist) presents (linking) Mysterious Traveller (artist)" for the artist (Moz-Art and Mysterious Traveller are both artists) and "Afroart" for the album title
2017-07-15 19637, 2017
RavenWorks
but somebody else has entered another one as "Moz-Art" as the artist and "Mysterious Traveler:Brazilart" as the album name
anyway I mean I guess I'll just go for it and let the votes decide :P that's what the voting system's there for...
2017-07-15 19615, 2017
RavenWorks
ok, another question: if an artist is credited as something, will that make them turn up in a search for the thing they're credited as automatically, or should I also make an alias for it on their artist page?
2017-07-15 19647, 2017
JoeLlama joined the channel
2017-07-15 19647, 2017
RavenWorks
like, if something already appears in the 'artist credits' section of their aliases page, should it be manually added to the 'aliases' list too or is that enough
