Is the guideline. We used to force-expand it but we decided it makes no sense
TOPIC: MusicBrainz Community | See #metabrainz for development and the other *Brainz’s | Channel is logged; see https://musicbrainz.org/doc/IRC for details | Latest Release: https://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=7454 | Picard 2.1.3 released! https://picard.musicbrainz.org
reosarevok: For cover like this there is not vol or volume, then what should be used?
reosarevok
I'd just use "American Favorite Ballads 3"
leeijaw
I looked the cover art closely, there is very tiny "vol." before 3.
LOL, easy to miss that.
reosarevok
Oh! That there is
Then yeah, Vol. 3
But in general, it's fine to just have the number after the title too, if there's nothing printed :)
nobody joined the channel
jesus2099
Hi there!
I have an Android phone now (an old one but still) and it's awesome how Firefox is waaaay faster than Chrome on it and most importantly how well it can run... USER SCRIPTS!!!!!
I tried COLLECTION HIGHLIGHTER and it... WORKS!!!!!!
I can checkout my collection on the go, now! in record stores and everything AT LAST!!! 8-D
I tested COLLECTION HIGHLIGHTER on Violentmonkey 2.10.5 with Firefox 68.0 on Samsung Grand Prime SM-G530FZ with Android 5.0.2
elomatreb[m]
Ad blockers on phones feel like a strange super power
jesus2099
Some scripts may not work though. Like INSTALL USER SCRIPTS does not work, not a big deal.
nobody has quit
elomatreb[m] wich ad blocker do you advise on mobile?
elomatreb[m]
ublock origin as a firefox extension, same as on desktop
jesus2099
ok good, thank you!
I use Fair AdBlocker on Vivaldi. I am happy with it but do you think I should try ublock origin instead?
I may be converted to Firefox for my PC as well, now that I use it on Android.
elomatreb[m]
ublock origin is fully open source and not sponsored by any corporations, which is a rare thing in adblockers
Many that are sponsored by corporations tend to include "permissible ads" at some point, where people can pay the company to whitelist their ads
jesus2099
does uBlock Origin also blocks video ads (like Faire AdBlocker does)?
I wonder why/how Fair AdBlocker (it seems not famous, is it?) can have 127 285 reviews while uBlock Origin has "only" 21 343.
elomatreb[m]
It depends on which filter lists you subscribe to, but with the default settings I don't think I've ever seen a video ad
jesus2099
Especizally when you see that uBlock Origin has 10 000 000+ users while Fair AdBlocker "only" has 1 574 691 users
opposite stast, isn't it suspicious? Like if they did false reviews?
It's sad to see Chrome seems way much more used than Firefox BTW
nav2002__ joined the channel
FF addon uBlock Origin has 0,20% reviews/users
Chrome addon uBlock Origin has around or less than 0,21% reviews/users
Chrome addon Fair AdBlocker has 8% reviews/users
It really looks fishy, I should really use uBlock Origin now.
Installed on my Vivaldi now. Thanks elomatreb[m] )
Tykling has quit
tykling joined the channel
D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
Freso
jesus2099: Maybe compare it to others, but I’d also wager that 8% reviews/user seems fishy. Either they’re not playing fair (🤔 pun not intended…), or they’re heavily nudging its users to write reviews for them (which I personally find annoying and would be a reason for me to not use it).
D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
Lotheric
jesus2099: If you want a faster chrome-ish browser on Android, try Brave, it's faster than Chrome and has ad-blocking built-in
on desktop, I use Nano-Adblocker which is a fork of uBlock Origin
with nano adblocker, you can install nano defender which is an extension that blocks "ad-blocker popup warning", essentially it blocks adblockers blockers lol
outsidecontext joined the channel
outsidecontext_ joined the channel
outsidecontext has quit
outsidecontext_ is now known as outsidecontext
jesus2099 joined the channel
jesus2099
Lotheric what I wanted and now I have it, is COLLECTION HIGHLIGHTER, no more no less. :)