See "This page used to be a guideline. It's no longer one, since it shouldn't be the editors' job to worry about clusters - but it is an important issue to keep in mind when designing (and proposing) new relationships. When possible (and reasonable), try to find an alternative that does not imply clusters of relationships"
For siblings, that's not reasonable
Add them all
chaban
That will take a while.
reosarevok
It's not that bad, you can open all 4, and add 3 to one, 2 to the next, 1 to the last :)
chaban
Done.
Now I wonder if it still makes sense to keep the parents.
reosarevok
Are they relevant musically in any way?
chaban
Not that I'm aware.
reosarevok
Then maybe not? I dunno
chaban
Couldn't find anything relevant and canceled my edits.
Freso
Lotheric: :p
Gazooo has quit
Gazooo joined the channel
Lotheric
don't tongue me out at 5am in the morning :P
Lotheric wwakes up
Freso: on neo-trad.. yep it does seems like a similar definition
afaik that is pretty depreciated as a guideline. reosarevok ?
ehehe
albertus1 has quit
D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
reosarevok
CatQuest: read until the end! :p
albertus1 joined the channel
D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
JoeLlama joined the channel
xplt joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
albertus1 joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
albertus1 joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
Vacuity_ has quit
Vacuity joined the channel
CatQuest
reosarevok: yes apparently!
reosarevok: yes apparently! :D
eh
hmm but that page . should probably have some border or osme thing ot show that it is *not* a current guideline per say
i never agreeed with "avoid relationship clusters" guideline anyway. it was dumb and the so-called issues with it is easily avoidabel by simply linking everyone with everyone
reosarevok: can we edit/reword/remove outdated parts of that? ie, reconfigure it to be a "guideline for consitheration when creating relationships, not for editors at large"
i thikn it will create issues with peopel ooking at this, not reading the introduction and going straight to solutions and doing liek chabna did, thne creating new unneeded artists to make "special members" (whih creates a whole lot more problemsthan it solves anyway)
JoeLlama has quit
Vacuity_ joined the channel
Vacuity has quit
chaban: where did you find this page anyway? it's no longer a styleguide, was it linked anywhere promenetly?
albertus1 joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
albertus1 joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
albertus1 joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
albertus1 joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
albertus1 joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
albertus1 joined the channel
albertus1 has quit
gioele joined the channel
kepstin
reosarevok: imo it's fine - that's a user-submitted database, but relies on a proprietary dynamic range scanner (kinda meh, but whatever)