and is it okay if i push the " No Linguistic content " up the options List (which passed down to react-select) manually like below Multi Language
2021-12-02 33611, 2021
CatQuest
uh
2021-12-02 33632, 2021
CatQuest
I'd just want to see it while typing "no"
2021-12-02 33620, 2021
CatQuest
also [multi] should maybe be removed (since we already *can* select several languages) (tho not fortitle, so thatmiht need fixing)
2021-12-02 33632, 2021
CatQuest
also i'd like a listof them ost comonly used (like on mb) and under this [no linguistic], [multiple] (if we keep it) as well as [artificial (other)] since title or language could be in some language that doesn't exist/was created only for this book, and we can't add a one-book language
2021-12-02 33611, 2021
Shubh
Hmm , we can do custom language thing where user can create one if he didn't find desired language in options
2021-12-02 33629, 2021
CatQuest
hahaha no.
2021-12-02 33609, 2021
Shubh
when user type no wouldn't it be good if we suggest him option like north .. , user generally won't search for "no linguistic"
2021-12-02 33634, 2021
CatQuest
of course.
2021-12-02 33645, 2021
CatQuest
usually i type "no" for "norwegian" :D
2021-12-02 33603, 2021
CatQuest
my point is that [no linguistic] should *also* be in the list whne writing "n"
2021-12-02 33614, 2021
CatQuest
erh whne writing "no"
2021-12-02 33639, 2021
Shubh
tnot require to be at top?
2021-12-02 33608, 2021
CatQuest
I'd assume it'll sort the way everything else does
2021-12-02 33621, 2021
CatQuest
so if i type "no li" it shows first
2021-12-02 33655, 2021
CatQuest
but if i type "no" it sorts alphabetically with "north lumbago" "norwegian" and all the other languages with "no"
2021-12-02 33610, 2021
Shubh
and that happens when we suggest user using starting character of word
2021-12-02 33617, 2021
CatQuest
(I made up north lumbago, i don't recall any languages with "north" in it right now)
2021-12-02 33635, 2021
CatQuest
i don't know what to say. have you tried using the interface?
2021-12-02 33646, 2021
Shubh
ha there are some north something
2021-12-02 33600, 2021
Shubh
Yep !
2021-12-02 33658, 2021
Shubh
by default it suggest based on "if that language contain that word" but if we do "if that language starts from that word" then no linguistic would appear on the top
2021-12-02 33606, 2021
CatQuest
again ,i suggest checking how it already works on the site /talk with monkey
2021-12-02 33620, 2021
CatQuest
you wil lsee how it works. it works fine
2021-12-02 33639, 2021
CatQuest
my issue is that "no linguistic" doenst actually show whne it is expected that it should
2021-12-02 33643, 2021
Shubh
it is showing when i type no l..
2021-12-02 33607, 2021
Shubh has quit
2021-12-02 33601, 2021
Shubh joined the channel
2021-12-02 33618, 2021
Shubh has left the channel
2021-12-02 33647, 2021
Shubh joined the channel
2021-12-02 33620, 2021
jess joined the channel
2021-12-02 33632, 2021
Shubh has quit
2021-12-02 33640, 2021
Shubh joined the channel
2021-12-02 33630, 2021
Shubh
Hey CatQuest , then what would be best way to show langauge suggestion and that no linguistic thing ..
So not sure about this one. For starters, "No linguistic content" does show in the search results dropdown when typing "no", so I think that part of the ticket has been fixed.
2021-12-02 33651, 2021
monkey
Agh, messages got lost.
2021-12-02 33620, 2021
monkey
I do think adding brackets would help make it stand out as a special case language like for [Multiple languages]
2021-12-02 33636, 2021
monkey
That's a change that I would have to do in the database
but should we rather suggest Language based on starting character ?
2021-12-02 33606, 2021
monkey
I don't understand
2021-12-02 33636, 2021
monkey
So there is minimal sorting on "frequency" which is defined in the database (basically = most used languages) and then alphabetically.
2021-12-02 33636, 2021
monkey
I don't think "no linguistic content" would make it to the list of most used languages, so I think just adding the brackets is a good solution to mark it out as different.
i didn't know that there was some sort of sorting mechanism based in options , now it make sense to not use any custom filter ..
2021-12-02 33619, 2021
Shubh
anyway , thanks for clearing the doubts monkey !
2021-12-02 33625, 2021
monkey
No worries !
2021-12-02 33645, 2021
monkey
By the way, I wanted to say you're doing great for your introduction in open source projects ! :)
2021-12-02 33639, 2021
Shubh
not sure about that ...
2021-12-02 33618, 2021
monkey
Well look, you came to us when you had questions setting up, you've been polite and nice, helped me debug what was broken in our setup, opened 5 PRs and helped me review one of mine, all that in the space of a week ! 🚀
2021-12-02 33602, 2021
Shubh
but i couldn't have done this without your help !
2021-12-02 33618, 2021
Shubh
monkey about that input field , showing invalid input for other fields in PR for BB-513
I saw the same thing in your PR, which is what I would expect to happen. We prefill the name, which is the same as if the user typed it. Validation stays the same
2021-12-02 33632, 2021
Shubh
Ohh so validation trigger if user type something , hmmm
2021-12-02 33609, 2021
monkey
sort of. I think validation happens when you load the page, and subsequently when any field is modified
KassOtsimine: The result is in there, you have to scroll further down in the list. However if you now try on test.LB you'll see I adde [brackets] and that will put no linguistic content at the top of the not-the-most-used languages
2021-12-02 33659, 2021
CatQuest
oic
2021-12-02 33612, 2021
CatQuest
yea i noticed that it was lower down
2021-12-02 33632, 2021
CatQuest
jup i see it.
2021-12-02 33634, 2021
monkey
Yeah, we do sort more frequent languages above the rest.
2021-12-02 33650, 2021
CatQuest
👍 now it behves as i expect. i'd consider this closed when on beta :D
2021-12-02 33658, 2021
monkey
All righty
2021-12-02 33601, 2021
CatQuest
good good
2021-12-02 33654, 2021
monkey
Wanna try again in a new window in prod? :)
2021-12-02 33605, 2021
CatQuest
oh
2021-12-02 33624, 2021
CatQuest
wait why would you directly to prod? you sohuld only directly to beta :P
2021-12-02 33646, 2021
monkey
It's only a modification of the name of the language in the database
2021-12-02 33607, 2021
monkey
test DB first, and then prod DB (which is also used by beta.BB).
2021-12-02 33639, 2021
CatQuest
:|
2021-12-02 33619, 2021
monkey
?
2021-12-02 33604, 2021
monkey
There's no code change so I can't deploy anything (whether it's on beta or prod). But we did test the database change on test.BB which uses a test database;
2021-12-02 33602, 2021
CatQuest
i don't really get it :D
2021-12-02 33614, 2021
monkey
I didn't change anything in the code
2021-12-02 33634, 2021
CatQuest
erh ok? i dunno :)
2021-12-02 33644, 2021
monkey
I change the name of the language from "No linguistic content" to "[No linguistic content]" in the database, that's the only thing I changed
