<jmnw[m]> "I expect a better solution would..." <- I created a ticket for that too while we're here, that would indeed be a better solution. Thanks for providing a file sample!
soundandvision[m uploaded an image: (170KiB) < https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/download/chatbrainz.org/TwzdpSBQkBkTbZwNHXAZbhYL/image.png >
2025-10-23 29636, 2025
soundandvision[m
is this sorting method for displaying albums on purpose 😆 seems odd
2025-10-23 29657, 2025
terinjokes joined the channel
2025-10-23 29621, 2025
glabnob[m] joined the channel
2025-10-23 29622, 2025
glabnob[m]
i agree it's not perfect, but it's really not quite how your arrow shows either, is it? even columns aren't inverted in the way your arrow would suggest if these are sorted by date
2025-10-23 29655, 2025
monkey[m]
I think some of the reason is because of the CSS grid system used for this grid layout.... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/download/chatbrainz.org/BbxumrbkVODoxGtbtYjjRbAG>)
2025-10-23 29642, 2025
glabnob[m]
Because it's scrollable I can understand trying to get it to sort in the direction of the scroll, but I think introducing the second row kind of throws that off... I hadn't looked at the discography for artists much on LB, but I just saw one where it was a single scrollable row; that makes perfect sense to me. Where it fills multiple though, I just saw one where the Single section was hiding every other entry because I hadn't
2025-10-23 29643, 2025
glabnob[m]
clicked "See full discography" which I would have assumed was hiding only older stuff or other categories if I hadn't already been apart of this conversation
2025-10-23 29613, 2025
glabnob[m]
* to sort more in the, * the scroll, top to bottom then left to right, but I
2025-10-23 29645, 2025
glabnob[m]
Would it be too much trouble to have it be a single scrollable row (perhaps up to a defined scrollable max count) and then offer a "see more/all" button that would expand it to as many rows (sorted instead left to right then top to bottom) as are necessary to show all for that section? I'm trying to come up with ways that keep a more immediately understandable sort pattern but don't also require massive screen real estate unless