mayhem: Missed you message sorry! Is this about the Explore ticket? Haven’t dug in yet, should be able to do so soon
yvanzo: just read your message about not overloading with visuals, and that the ‘main author’ should be involved (nice of you to give them a break from pings!)
The reason I’m interested in this is because I find the rollover with a link to pending edits particularly useful - not just in the context of the relationships editor. So if we get this right I would love to see it added elsewhere in the site too. I’m certain other users who do a lot of editing will agree.
trolley has quit
I’m going to continue to spit all of my ideas into the ticket, fully conscious that they might not be a good fit/too cluttered, and be discarded 👍
trolley joined the channel
Lotheric_ is now known as Lotheric
monkey: yvanzo: I’m happy for someone to assign themselves MBS-12866/BB-625 and implement mockup #8. The connection graphic should be easy to change if someone thinks of a better way to do it in the future.
is it possible to move at least one of those to another server (with more free disk space)?
mayhem: Moin! What do you mean the thing is coded and done?
moin. its done. and deployed to test. it could be merged and deployed into production in seconds.
I’ll spend some time on some interesting images if you’re cool with them being ‘representative’ of the features themselves (will have to be tomorrow)
Done, minus my feedback ;)
I'm happy to put whatever images you supply in there. easier for me.
Great, I’ll try come up with something cool
Did you have a look at the responsive layout?
And the overlay svg (but not sure that will work)
not yet, just waking up still. just got coffee.
ok, I see your responsive design, I'll make that happen.
That’s good, because I’m falling asleep! If you can get back to me in the next 8 hours that would be efficient, but even that’s only a guideline
in the future, we should always specify how something needs to be responsive.
Also if something’s a faff let me know and I can tweak the design
radial gradients don't work -- please redesign the effect with a linear gradient.
I just now noticed that we're not respecting aspect ratios of the images in your responsive design. was that on purpose?
I have a list of mockups to do and mocking each one up responsive takes a lot of time - especially when the design could change before it gets implemented. Going forward if you let me know you’re implementing something for real real I’ll get onto make a proper spec document (I really need to get round to doing this for the gsoc Fresh Releases ahh)
I left a comment for that, the stretching is just my dirty mockup :)
I dont think the responsiveness needs to actually be mocked up. I think a description of what you'd like would be sufficient.
but I have an idea what you have in mind, so I can work on that today.
Comment re images: “BG images shouldn’t actually be stretched in anyway in prod. Make them 100% width, let them move/crop vertically?” (but there might be a better of way of doing it that looks nice)
ok, can do.
I tend to have to mock it up for myself anyway. And I don’t trust devs to follow notes haha. Actually, I do trust MeB devs to. But I probably wouldn’t go that far with gsoc students, sorry gsoc students!
Great work on Explore in any case! I’m excited!
thanks, monkey and I are finally starting the redesign...
I’m excited and also panicked about the things I still need to do! Ran out of time to sort all the extra settings pages, etc, today again, sorry monkey
No worries aerozol, we don't want you to be stressed out! I raised those points up in advance to give you time to figure them out, they don't need to be ready by Friday and we can sort some of the questions together
Thanks monkey, I will sleep easy. Another week of family visits this week it turns out. The horror
Feverish dreams of family mockups
"Ok, totally drop cousin Mark. He's just not needed"
So like "Edit #9911133 - Remove disc ID (pre‐NGS) (?)"
With (?) leading to the docs for "Remove disc ID (pre‐NGS)" (I guess as a link?)
Hmm, that sounds helpful. The only thing I can think of is trying to avoid clutter and too many icons. If we want to implement a lot of this kind of thing perhaps we should stick to the top right for links to help and docs, as we decided in: https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-12935
MBS-12935: Beta: Type's documentation is no longer accessible from relationship editor
So on the top right corner of the edit header?
Yes. I think in this individual case that might not be as clear as next to the text, but thinking of the big picture I think it could be a good idea
reosarevok: Just to the left of ‘my vote’ could be consistent with the other pages. Short term it feels like a weird choice, but it would benefit from some space away from the text. I probably need to sleep on it, or you can put it in and then we’ll quickly see if it’s stupid there…
avane has quit
Ok, I'll try and then you can scream if you hate it :)
Sounds good! Good night all
kellnerd joined the channel
jivte has quit
avane joined the channel
Hi bitmap, while there are no bug reports for the latest MBS release yet, I haven't been that lucky:
I'm afraid I need your help again with a little relationship editor userscript regression...
Batch creating relationships with the new rel editor was supposedly working per my checklist, but today I've received a report that it no longer works.
It's not the most used feature of my userscripts, so I could have been broken for a while already.
Unfortunately there is no error message in the console, only a useless report will be sent to sentry.
Zoro joined the channel
Zoro has quit
akshaaatt: bitmap lucifer monkey outsidecontext reosarevok zas : please log into the summer of code web page and follow these instructions "If a person was a Mentor or Org Admin for your org in 2022 then they just need to log in to g.co/gsoc and click on the 2023 bar which should now show them the 2023 Program Rules and Org Member agreement that they need to read and agree to. Once they have done that they will appear in the Org Admin's
dropdown of folks to add to the 2023 program."
if something is a miss, please let me know.
do we have any docs about wiki setup? I find nothing in syswiki.