aerozol: the PR has merge conflicts. meaning that someone else modified the same file as you in the master branch since you opened the PR. one way to fix is 1) update your local master branch, 2) merge it into your branch (accepting the changes from master), 3) reruning the command to udpate snapshots. 4) push the changes
i can resolve the conflicts or help you do so if needed.
aerozol
Thanks lucifer, I'll try it tomorrow! Off to D&D now like the huge nerd I am
lucifer
hehe. nice
aerozol
mayhem: I brainstormed some grid ideas but didn't get round to polishing any. I'll pick some candidates and mock them up tomorrow as well
aerozol: how about letting there be an user endpoint thing in the grid ideas? like, all these might be interesting. so we coudl have adefault or two, but let peopel create plugins/scripts to see the other ones or (whatever they pick!) and cna be shared between users
so you could have differnt grid ideas and different views, and thne users could create more
for visiualisations and "sharing your music-taste/playlists etc" off site as well as on community
some of these grid views would look really snazzy as advertisement for listenbrainz
in some music forum or redditpost or whatever
aerozol
I believe that's mayhem's plan! Let people choose the design and then the size/time range etc, to share
If that's what you meant. If it's like a data endpoint thing that you mean then I dunno
rozlav has quit
CatQuest
I dunno either. I was just replying to your "grid ideas" notepad image :D
CatQuest off
rozlav joined the channel
agatzk has quit
mayhem
Moin!
lucifer
morning!
mayhem
Yes, the Paris bit sure didn't help. I think you should let go of Paris plans, but that is tricky now, I guess.
For the next attempt we should make up an important meeting BCN for a few days. Then use an executive service to apply for the visa.
The main goal here is to get one visa on your record and that should make future trips easier.
lucifer
yeah. i guess i would need to book a return ticket and cancel this one but that seems to be the only way so fine i think.
yes, makes sense
mayhem
Was getting some amount of refund an option?
lucifer
the booking portal says this one is non-refundable but i'll ask the helpdesk again if they can do anything about it.
alastairp: Hi! For CB-394, we need to think of one thing, If we have plans to have more license options later on. Because if we have some, then we'll probably not remove the user's preference column from the users table.
ansh: what is your current plan? Keep the existing license table, and keep the license for existing reviews, but from now on only give people the option for CC BY-SA?
in fact, I think it makes sense for us to go forward and upgrade this to the v4 license too.
one thing we could do is ask users to upgrade their licenses to the v4 version when they log in
lucifer
upgrade their license preference?
ansh
Yes. Thats the plan. And also remove the user's preference form to select default license
alastairp
lucifer: ask them if they want to re-license all of their v3 texts as the v4 license
lucifer
i see. currently we don't allow change of license after publishing a review.
alastairp
right, the idea would be to keep the same license, but just change to the newer version of it
lucifer
maybe we can ask them to relicense the NC ones too then?
ah ok
alastairp
I understand the v4 CC licenses are much better than earlier ones
darkstardevx has quit
yes, we could ask them, but they'd have to be able to decline that
lucifer
yup makes sense
alastairp
if we wanted to do that we should explain why we want them to change and why it's a better idea
ansh: right, removing the pref option is good. I think you're right, we can keep the user pref column and mark it as null for everyone
ansh
Since many of our users would review from LB and BB, maybe we can also add a message there also.
Makes sense
alastairp
I agree that there might be some users who only write reviews via LB/BB, but let's focus on the users who visit CB first
we could add an internal API endpoint for ourselves "has-v3-license", and ping it from LB, prompting users to visit CB to do the upgrade
alastairp: looking at chat logs, because its a non-free license so we decided to remove it. it seems we also discussed it at summit 2020 but can't find anything in summit notes about it.
alastairp
lucifer: oh, thanks for looking back at that. yes, I do have some general understanding that -nc licenses have problems, but can't remember our specific discussions about them
lucifer
>_lucifer: we've been talking about it for 3-4 years, so maybe in another 2 years or so we'll be ready to start :)
alastairp
we just needed the right person to come and help :)
lucifer
alastairp: ^, it'll be 2 years in a week :).
alastairp
!m ansh
BrainzBot
You're doing good work, ansh!
lucifer
oh that was about MeB OAuth.
but yes indeed, ansh is doing great work.
ansh
Thank you :)
alastairp
ansh: did you rebase your PRs to include lucifer's recent fixes?
ansh
alastairp: Yes
alastairp
excellent, thanks. opening this one now
lucifer
if it helps, i can review some of those PRs.
alastairp
lucifer: thanks, which one(s) would you like to look at?