I made a dupe RG because errors submitting it's so bad right now. Guess I will go to bed and fix in the morning so i don't dupe the fix as well lol
2025-11-10 31457, 2025
afrocat_[m]
i think i just did the same thing lmao
2025-11-10 31405, 2025
YoMo12[m] joined the channel
2025-11-10 31405, 2025
YoMo12[m]
So slow 😞
2025-11-10 31430, 2025
Highstrung[m] joined the channel
2025-11-10 31431, 2025
Highstrung[m]
Yeah I had a discord import error out partway through. Release was created with no medium.
2025-11-10 31434, 2025
DavideMelarato[m has quit
2025-11-10 31425, 2025
dragonzeron[m] joined the channel
2025-11-10 31425, 2025
dragonzeron[m]
is there a slowdown happening rn
2025-11-10 31429, 2025
afrocat_[m]
seems so
2025-11-10 31436, 2025
dragonzeron[m]
ok
2025-11-10 31448, 2025
dragonzeron[m]
cause iam trying to get some works added
2025-11-10 31456, 2025
frozen[m]1 joined the channel
2025-11-10 31456, 2025
frozen[m]1
the site doesn't even want to load for me
2025-11-10 31456, 2025
frozen[m]1
unless i keep hitting refresh refresh refresh
2025-11-10 31401, 2025
chariri[m]
<chariri[m]> "For example, the original..." <- I think I'm going to just write everyone credited by the original material into the track artist field for now...
2025-11-10 31421, 2025
chariri[m]
better than leaving blank maybe
2025-11-10 31422, 2025
darkadonis[m] joined the channel
2025-11-10 31422, 2025
darkadonis[m]
musicbrainz is constantly slow and difficult for me for like 1 week and a half now
2025-11-10 31441, 2025
darkadonis[m]
I thought again that it was an issue on my side, seems like it is not.
2025-11-10 31438, 2025
darkadonis[m]
Constant "The connection was reinitialized" and relationship loading extremely slowly, is there a mean to seen the server status of Metabrainz ? I do not know who is responsible etc.
2025-11-10 31410, 2025
darkadonis[m]
oh nevermind, it's a ongoing issue that is being solutioned by zas, sorry !!!!
there's different styles for different types of releases
2025-11-10 31402, 2025
dvirtz[m]
* > What should I put into the track/recording artist field when the track artist is not clearly indicated in the original release material? Posted this several times on MB forum and talked with some friends privately, but have not reached a consensus yet.
there's different styles for different types of releases
2025-11-10 31425, 2025
rustynova[m] has quit
2025-11-10 31414, 2025
tagomago joined the channel
2025-11-10 31439, 2025
vzctr81191 joined the channel
2025-11-10 31448, 2025
chariri[m]
<dvirtz[m]> "chariri, did you read through..." <- dvirtz: Yes, for sure. The issue is that
2025-11-10 31448, 2025
chariri[m]
1. "Doujin -> VOCALOID music -> VOCALOID CHINA music" is a relatively niche sector, so definitely no separated guideline for that.
2025-11-10 31448, 2025
chariri[m]
2. The way those pieces are released is not fitting well with the traditional Title-Artist-Album model, especially for compilation (not referring to the comps like "Best 50 Pops", but those albums in which most songs are new, but done by different artists without no affiliate relationship to the CD producer) and video releases (e.g. pieces posted to YouTube or bilibili).
The issue is mostly discussed at the aforementioned "How to handle doujin music" topic, which is a years-long discussion. But my cases are still not very well-covered in the post.
2025-11-10 31402, 2025
chariri[m]
I attached some examples in the /806835 topic.
2025-11-10 31430, 2025
chariri[m]
The cases here are yet different from Japanese VOCALOID titles which are mostly done by one single artist ("the producer").
2025-11-10 31430, 2025
chariri[m]
I'm thinking about reaching out to active editors who are maintain VOCALOID titles for their opinions (since most of them seem not to check the forum and matrix often 😅). Is it OK/polite to just send E-Mail via MB to several of them (e.g. 7sDream )?
2025-11-10 31401, 2025
chariri[m]
* 7sDream ) - since this may look like spamming (?
2025-11-10 31459, 2025
tagomago has quit
2025-11-10 31413, 2025
tagomago joined the channel
2025-11-10 31403, 2025
dvirtz[m]
Maybe leave a comment on one of their edits. They should get a mail on that
2025-11-10 31434, 2025
break19 has quit
2025-11-10 31422, 2025
break19 joined the channel
2025-11-10 31441, 2025
v6lur_ joined the channel
2025-11-10 31419, 2025
frodo has quit
2025-11-10 31442, 2025
tiferrei[m] joined the channel
2025-11-10 31442, 2025
tiferrei[m]
Hi everyone :)
2025-11-10 31442, 2025
tiferrei[m]
I am using a tool that makes calls to the musicbrainz API to get metadata. A lot of my calls seem to be failing often. Is there perhaps a status page I could check, to see if there are any expected issues? Thanks!
2025-11-10 31419, 2025
lusciouslover has quit
2025-11-10 31424, 2025
lusciouslover joined the channel
2025-11-10 31436, 2025
frodo joined the channel
2025-11-10 31455, 2025
frodo has quit
2025-11-10 31416, 2025
frodo joined the channel
2025-11-10 31424, 2025
tagomago has quit
2025-11-10 31443, 2025
frodo has quit
2025-11-10 31459, 2025
tagomago joined the channel
2025-11-10 31440, 2025
Toasty joined the channel
2025-11-10 31441, 2025
frodo joined the channel
2025-11-10 31431, 2025
bitmap[m] joined the channel
2025-11-10 31432, 2025
bitmap[m]
hi tiferrei, the web service should be operating normally, what kind of failures are you seeing?
2025-11-10 31450, 2025
frodo has quit
2025-11-10 31439, 2025
frodo joined the channel
2025-11-10 31455, 2025
frodo has quit
2025-11-10 31413, 2025
tiferrei[m]
Hi [bitmap](https://matrix.to/#/@bitmap:chatbrainz.org), I’m using beets, which makes some calls for metadata of specific releases. Unfortunately I can only see from the stack traces some “connection reset by peer” errors. This may be anecdotal but if I wait for a while, more calls go through before they fail again. Could I be getting rate limited? AFAIK beets implement sensible call intervals.
