#metabrainz

not much to go on.

contacting them is one options, yes.

what started this was the digital 1/2. (which is us based)...

but unless we have a clear idea that our data is in fact being used, it is nothing but a fishing expedition.

yeah

since the email is invalid. should I clean it out?

I would leave this be and just sort of be aware of that name

yeah

Is the next expedition after IKEA?

+that

ok

LordSputnik: Ping?

alastairp: IIRC you were going to make more tweaks to the test.py script, right?

sorry, test.sh

yep

about 70% done

going home shortly

got ETA?

hopefully tonight

maybe tomorrow afternoon

ok, I'll put some effort towards the integration tests.

Freso: Sadly, GitHub Pages doesn't let you SSL your custom domain. :(

Maybe we should move off of GH pages…

i have started with test_api.py too, I'll probably send a PR tomorrow or the day after

sampsyo: Or maybe they could start doing that with LE now.

In fact, there's a petition about that: https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/e07d42f5961c68...

sampsyo: https://blog.cloudflare.com/secure-and-fast-git...

Nifty!

alastairp, Gentlecat: for pytest I want to have a set of unit tests and a set of integration tests for LB. I want the unit tests to run separately from the integration tests. Any thoughts on how test files should be laid out to facilitate this?

with py.test you can specifify a directory that you want to run

so I'd just have a directory somewhere - perhaps tests/integration ?

[16:30] <Quesito> as idea for decor--world wall map that we can pin where our supporters/users are around the world.

[16:30] <Freso> And community members. And staff/office users.

+1§

+1!

+1@

+1$

+1*

tests/integration seems a bit too conflated still.

why? because currently our normal tests are inline in the code?

normal tests just test from the top level dir, e.g. test everything.

that would mean that we need to specify a subset for testing.

kind of - pytest.ini specifies specific directories to test

[acousticbrainz-server] alastair opened pull request #219: Dataset api clean (master...dataset-api-clean) https://git.io/vDWb5

[acousticbrainz-server] alastair closed pull request #213: Add/Delete recordings changes for dataset-api-part2 (dataset-api-part2...dataset-api-part2-vibhor) https://git.io/vXTCi

http://doc.pytest.org/en/latest/mark.html is one option I see

so, we if I did: ./tests/unit and ./tests/integration and move the existing unit tests into the unit test dir and then update pytest.ini ?

and then running the integration tests we would just pass in ./test/integration

that would work.

unfortunately I think that moving existing tests is one of those things that we'd have to have a discussion about

simply because we have the current format in CB/MeB/AB/LB

I'd vote for not having tests in a separate directory tree

that is I'd prefer to have them either in the same directory as the module they are testing or in ./test

FYI, I develop locally with pycharm + uniitest2 test runner

so I'd want to see a very good argument to use pytest specific hooks

I'd like to try and make the argument that integration tests are specific and special enough that they can live in their own tree, even if we leave unit tests inline with the code

would be useful to see some examples

-> home, errands, gym, food. I should be back around meeting time, and will try and put something together

I need to have a bit of a think about it

Freso: I won't be there for meeting today. Didn't do much this week :(

oh, anshuman73, I didn't respond the other day. sorry. yes, when we have the dates then let's talk about meeting up during the GCI summit.

where did wildwatz go? ;(

Why load on bowie suddenly increased last night ? https://stats.metabrainz.org/dashboard/db/hetzn...

Found a small bug in get_listens leading to NameError because current_app was not imported :D

testing ftw!

zas: looks like it's dropping, no?

if so, it was the indexer for solr

[listenbrainz-server] paramsingh opened pull request #116: Import current_app to api.py so that get_listens doesn't throw error (master...get-listen-fix) https://git.io/vDlkq

alastairp: heh, what I always wondered: how does acousticbrainz deal with deleted entities. for example if one merges some recordings which have AB data.

it doesn't

zas: your link requires a login. :D

I made a generic login on grafana... maybe it can become a "guest" type user

[listenbrainz-server] mayhem closed pull request #116: Import current_app to api.py so that get_listens doesn't throw error (master...get-listen-fix) https://git.io/vDlkq

thanks iliekcomputers :)

iliekcomputers: are you planning on participating in GSoC?

mayhem: yea, the stats idea of yours is pretty interesting to me.

I had that sneaky suspicion.. :)

i was gonna talk about GSoC in today's meeting lol :)

given what things are hot today, I suspect that a lot of people will want do that one.

when is the gsoc deadline for orgs?

9th

mayhem: i was also thinking of simpler stuff like pages for artists, release-groups and more stats for users ala last.fm

stats for users is exactly what I am talking about on the ideas page.

mayhem: but the stuff like generic queries was not in my mind :)

it'd be pretty cool

I'll say this as general guidance to our GSoC applicants who are already part of our community: Your chances for getting accepted are higher than new people.

mayhem: how do you plan to show visualizations? d3.js?

mayhem: that is very nice to hear :D

that said, if you design something for yourself that is outside of the given ideas pages, you'll cut down the amount of competition you get.

I hadn't decided anything,but I am fond of d3, yes.

and don't get me wrong, I don't want to make a generic reporting system. I just want to make it easy to add more graphs/reports, etc.

building a truly extensible system is beyond what we need

also, I don't really want to wait until summer to work on these graphs.

if you're thinking of doing this project, we may just want to change the idea page to be a 2 part project.

part 1: iliekcomputers builds. part 2: continue iliekcomputers' work, ideally by iliekcomputers. :)

s/builds/builds graphs/

mayhem: I was actually hoping to get started as soon as the beta was deployed :D

i do want a viable alternative to last.fm myself

great.

You guys are nerds. <3

So this is one of the problems from the competition that no one could solve https://www.e-olymp.com/en/problems/6622

hmm a thing like some wikipages have a graph like thing that illustrates with images.. things like members-of-band, or an 150yr old orchestra ;)

that'd be cool

not that's what you're talking about, but

then you should have a long think about how to break your work into two parts. then we edit the ideas page.

heh, wow.

its a graph problem. all-pair-max-flow.

that's my guess based on the first paragraph. :)

sentence, actually.

each one of the problems has key terms that are red flags for certain algorithms.

the most critical thing in programming problems are problem selection.

the team needs to slice and dice the problems in a matter of minutes and pick the easiest ones.

failure to do that, but do other things well, places you in mid field, no further.

"time limit: 1 second"

wat?

mayhem: i'll get back to you on this in two or three days, hopefully, I'll have to think on it.

CatQuest: run time for the computer. not human time.

Not quite max-flow since it's undirected. Should just be shortest path.

right, phew!