#metabrainz

/

      • agentsim joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29435, 2017

      • agentsim has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29458, 2017

      • gcilou has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29457, 2017

      • agentsim joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29448, 2017

      • heyoni joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29431, 2017

      • heyoni has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29408, 2017

      • samj1912
        bitmap: ping
      • 2017-10-21 29436, 2017

      • samj1912
        what do you want me to fix in this PR https://github.com/metabrainz/sir/pull/45?
      • 2017-10-21 29458, 2017

      • samj1912
        a common relationship converter function?
      • 2017-10-21 29403, 2017

      • samj1912
        or just the type-ids?
      • 2017-10-21 29414, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        can i use the solr search to find releases that have an unknown media type? :D
      • 2017-10-21 29410, 2017

      • samj1912
        SothoTalker_: unknown media type as in?
      • 2017-10-21 29426, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        as in medium type not set
      • 2017-10-21 29430, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        this mostly applies to entries made early when there was no medium property yet and those releases havent been updated since then
      • 2017-10-21 29402, 2017

      • samj1912
      • 2017-10-21 29406, 2017

      • samj1912
        SothoTalker_: try this?
      • 2017-10-21 29410, 2017

      • samj1912
        not sure if it will work
      • 2017-10-21 29441, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        looks ok to me
      • 2017-10-21 29458, 2017

      • samj1912
        yup checked in MB
      • 2017-10-21 29459, 2017

      • samj1912
        works
      • 2017-10-21 29407, 2017

      • samj1912
        although, just a reminder, not everything is indexed
      • 2017-10-21 29407, 2017

      • samj1912
        just a reminder, in solr the ws equivalent for offset is start
      • 2017-10-21 29411, 2017

      • samj1912
        and for count is rows
      • 2017-10-21 29437, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        it's missing a nice gui :D
      • 2017-10-21 29444, 2017

      • 7GHAAXCWC joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29453, 2017

      • samj1912
        it isnt
      • 2017-10-21 29409, 2017

      • samj1912
        MB search is supposed to be the gui for it
      • 2017-10-21 29432, 2017

      • samj1912
        but well, solr in is pre-alpha :P
      • 2017-10-21 29437, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        "it's missing a nice gui :D"
      • 2017-10-21 29448, 2017

      • samj1912
      • 2017-10-21 29434, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        this looks very technical
      • 2017-10-21 29420, 2017

      • samj1912
        "but well, solr in is pre-alpha :P"
      • 2017-10-21 29425, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        what is fq, fl and df?
      • 2017-10-21 29449, 2017

      • samj1912
        google solr query syntax
      • 2017-10-21 29408, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        what does it stand for :-)
      • 2017-10-21 29435, 2017

      • samj1912
      • 2017-10-21 29416, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        i want support from you, not from google :|
      • 2017-10-21 29416, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        if i could rate this support channel you would have gotten a negative rating :p
      • 2017-10-21 29416, 2017

      • Leftmost
        SOLR query syntax is documented and isn't custom for our setup, so why is using googled docs worse?
      • 2017-10-21 29452, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        that is not the point. the point is, if i wanted to search for it myself, i would have done so. my laziness should not be a reason to rub it in. after all i am a nonpaying customer. :)
      • 2017-10-21 29403, 2017

      • SothoTalker_
        and now i demand a back rub.
      • 2017-10-21 29408, 2017

      • UmkaDK has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29443, 2017

      • UmkaDK joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29424, 2017

      • UmkaDK has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29404, 2017

      • UmkaDK joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29418, 2017

      • 7GHAAXCWC has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29422, 2017

      • UmkaDK has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29412, 2017

      • Leo_Verto
        loujine: hey, do you know if there's a way to export interactive graphs from plotly to html?
      • 2017-10-21 29445, 2017

      • UmkaDK joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29439, 2017

      • heyoni joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29405, 2017

      • heyoni has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29413, 2017

      • drsaunde has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29427, 2017

      • drsaunde joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29414, 2017

      • bitmap
        jwf|matrix: oh that's very cool, yeah I didn't know anyone else was out here. remind me when you are back :)
      • 2017-10-21 29454, 2017

      • bitmap
        samj1912: I think the changes you made are what I had in mind (sorry for the delay)
      • 2017-10-21 29435, 2017

      • samj1912
        cool :)
      • 2017-10-21 29436, 2017

      • bitmap
        though I am unsure about the target= there since the other rels don't have that https://github.com/samj1912/sir/blob/cf0733a/sir/…
      • 2017-10-21 29407, 2017

      • samj1912
        hmm, it was there before I started changing things
      • 2017-10-21 29412, 2017

      • bitmap
        (the standard WS doesn't output "target" keys anywhere, I think that is a search-only thing)
      • 2017-10-21 29421, 2017

      • samj1912
        it doesnt?
      • 2017-10-21 29429, 2017

      • samj1912
        hmm
      • 2017-10-21 29434, 2017

      • samj1912
        do you think we should remove that?
      • 2017-10-21 29439, 2017

      • bitmap
        in the json I mean...in the xml it might?
      • 2017-10-21 29447, 2017

      • samj1912
        hmmm
      • 2017-10-21 29442, 2017

      • bitmap
        yeah, only in the xml
      • 2017-10-21 29448, 2017

      • samj1912
      • 2017-10-21 29450, 2017

      • samj1912
        yup
      • 2017-10-21 29431, 2017

      • samj1912
        weird that it doesnt output it in json
      • 2017-10-21 29433, 2017

      • samj1912
        any reason?
      • 2017-10-21 29449, 2017

      • samj1912
        because there is a bug related to target output in json for search
      • 2017-10-21 29453, 2017

      • samj1912
        SOLR-16
      • 2017-10-21 29453, 2017

      • BrainzBot
        SOLR-16: relationship target gets rendered in different way for area results https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/SOLR-16
      • 2017-10-21 29403, 2017

      • bitmap
        well, it duplicates information that's already there
      • 2017-10-21 29416, 2017

      • samj1912
        true
      • 2017-10-21 29422, 2017

      • samj1912
        should I remove it?
      • 2017-10-21 29444, 2017

      • bitmap
        does the current search server output it?
      • 2017-10-21 29448, 2017

      • samj1912
        yes
      • 2017-10-21 29410, 2017

      • samj1912
      • 2017-10-21 29437, 2017

      • samj1912
        although the duplicacy is evident
      • 2017-10-21 29451, 2017

      • bitmap
        idk how widespread json search users are but I'd be afraid to break something people are using even though it's technically beta (still?)
      • 2017-10-21 29422, 2017

      • samj1912
        okay, ill leave it be then
      • 2017-10-21 29431, 2017

      • bitmap
        I wonder if it's always the mbid or if it's the URL for URLs like it is in the xml
      • 2017-10-21 29431, 2017

      • bitmap
        I guess the search doesn't index URL rels, nvm
      • 2017-10-21 29439, 2017

      • samj1912
        bitmap: any idea how the rels were decided (for output and indexing) in search?
      • 2017-10-21 29420, 2017

      • bitmap
        not really, I'm guessing on a case by case basis with the goal of outputting a minimal amount of useful data
      • 2017-10-21 29436, 2017

      • samj1912
        hmm, I found it a bit arbitrary (the amount of information that varies in the same relationship type from one entity to another for eg.)
      • 2017-10-21 29415, 2017

      • bitmap
        I may have overstated the amount of thought put into it :)
      • 2017-10-21 29409, 2017

      • samj1912
        who is the person I should be discussing this with? (in case we want to change/re-evaluate this in the future?)
      • 2017-10-21 29443, 2017

      • samj1912
        s/person/person/person(s)
      • 2017-10-21 29422, 2017

      • bitmap
        we can discuss it, or any other mbs/search devs
      • 2017-10-21 29411, 2017

      • bitmap
        the author of the old search server (ijabz) may have decided a lot of these things previously and he's not active anymore
      • 2017-10-21 29459, 2017

      • samj1912
        hmm, lets go over it once I am upto parity in terms of fields indexed and outputter
      • 2017-10-21 29404, 2017

      • samj1912
        *outputted
      • 2017-10-21 29421, 2017

      • bitmap
        sure
      • 2017-10-21 29420, 2017

      • samj1912
        I think only URL is left
      • 2017-10-21 29457, 2017

      • bitmap
        oh target, is only outputted for areas in the current search too? hmm, I would just remove it
      • 2017-10-21 29411, 2017

      • samj1912
        okay
      • 2017-10-21 29429, 2017

      • samj1912
        that would solve SOLR-16 as invalid :P
      • 2017-10-21 29430, 2017

      • BrainzBot
        SOLR-16: relationship target gets rendered in different way for area results https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/SOLR-16
      • 2017-10-21 29423, 2017

      • bitmap
        I'm surprised someone actually reported that
      • 2017-10-21 29411, 2017

      • bitmap
        I thought it was outputted for all relationships but that's just weird
      • 2017-10-21 29459, 2017

      • samj1912
        yup
      • 2017-10-21 29410, 2017

      • samj1912
        which is why I said the output is very arbitrary
      • 2017-10-21 29426, 2017

      • samj1912
        bitmap: can you help me with something
      • 2017-10-21 29435, 2017

      • samj1912
        https://musicbrainz.org/ws/2/url?query=uid:9ecd11…, here we have 2 urls with the same mbid
      • 2017-10-21 29447, 2017

      • samj1912
        but their relation list is different
      • 2017-10-21 29406, 2017

      • samj1912
        why is the relationlist not concatenated into one?
      • 2017-10-21 29430, 2017

      • samj1912
        like it could be just 1 item and have 2 items in the relationlist
      • 2017-10-21 29415, 2017

      • samj1912
      • 2017-10-21 29422, 2017

      • samj1912
        I guess its a bug.. sigh..
      • 2017-10-21 29434, 2017

      • samj1912
        url is the most shabbily done entity in search
      • 2017-10-21 29401, 2017

      • bitmap
        yes, looks like a bug to me
      • 2017-10-21 29446, 2017

      • jwf|matrix
        bitmap: Definitely will do. :)
      • 2017-10-21 29408, 2017

      • drsaunde has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29442, 2017

      • agentsim has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29436, 2017

      • heyoni joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29446, 2017

      • heyoni has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29452, 2017

      • github joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29452, 2017

      • github
        [sir] samj1912 opened pull request #47: SOLR-67: Bring URL to current search parity (master...solr67) https://git.io/vdNlx
      • 2017-10-21 29452, 2017

      • github has left the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29413, 2017

      • samj1912
        phew. and all done :D 🎉
      • 2017-10-21 29440, 2017

      • drsaunde joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29409, 2017

      • zas
        !m samj1912 🎉 !!!
      • 2017-10-21 29409, 2017

      • BrainzBot
        You're doing good work, samj1912 🎉 !!!!
      • 2017-10-21 29437, 2017

      • agentsim joined the channel
      • 2017-10-21 29407, 2017

      • agentsim has quit
      • 2017-10-21 29454, 2017

      • anthony25 has quit