#metabrainz

/

      • MusicbrainzB0T2 joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18326, 2018

      • MusicbrainzB0T has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18350, 2018

      • Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18327, 2018

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18324, 2018

      • Nyanko-sensei has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18357, 2018

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18302, 2018

      • samj1912
        onculayn: weird, which picard version is that?
      • 2018-07-02 18317, 2018

      • samj1912
        Are you using picard-dev from pypi?
      • 2018-07-02 18307, 2018

      • Lotheric has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18357, 2018

      • Lotheric joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18318, 2018

      • christomo joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18327, 2018

      • bukwurm joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18317, 2018

      • Leo__Verto has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18342, 2018

      • Leo__Verto joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18346, 2018

      • Leo__Verto has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18325, 2018

      • thomasross joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18351, 2018

      • samj1912
        Oh btw which python3 version are you using?
      • 2018-07-02 18358, 2018

      • samj1912
        Picard requires 3.5 minimum
      • 2018-07-02 18336, 2018

      • suhas2go joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18302, 2018

      • UmkaDK_ joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18337, 2018

      • UmkaDK has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18307, 2018

      • christomo has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18314, 2018

      • samj1912
        zas, you up?
      • 2018-07-02 18311, 2018

      • zas
        yes
      • 2018-07-02 18350, 2018

      • samj1912
        Wanna try setting up a replica?
      • 2018-07-02 18358, 2018

      • samj1912
        I wanna see how long it takes
      • 2018-07-02 18340, 2018

      • UmkaDK joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18355, 2018

      • UmkaDK_ has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18315, 2018

      • UmkaDK has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18358, 2018

      • UmkaDK joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18335, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Hmm, I'm getting a lot of "an error ocurred while searching" in inline search
      • 2018-07-02 18341, 2018

      • reosarevok
        (that work perfectly fine at the next attempt)
      • 2018-07-02 18303, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Any idea what's going on?
      • 2018-07-02 18311, 2018

      • reosarevok
        samj1912, zas ^^
      • 2018-07-02 18343, 2018

      • zas
        hmmm let me see, i made a change that could cause that
      • 2018-07-02 18350, 2018

      • zas
        which request ?
      • 2018-07-02 18315, 2018

      • ruaok
        what change did you make?
      • 2018-07-02 18333, 2018

      • reosarevok
        zas: everything, at seemingly random, in inline search
      • 2018-07-02 18342, 2018

      • zas
        just with inline search?
      • 2018-07-02 18356, 2018

      • zas
        tried few queries and all worked
      • 2018-07-02 18348, 2018

      • zas
        hmmm i see there's an increase in 4xx
      • 2018-07-02 18314, 2018

      • reosarevok
        No, I got something with normal now, "not enough info" or something, retry worked
      • 2018-07-02 18335, 2018

      • reosarevok
        samj1912: see last comment on https://community.metabrainz.org/t/search-results… - fairly sure this used to work (and IMO it should definitely work)
      • 2018-07-02 18331, 2018

      • reosarevok
        zas: still getting a ton of them
      • 2018-07-02 18334, 2018

      • reosarevok
        In beta, if it matters
      • 2018-07-02 18355, 2018

      • zas
        i don't see which changes i made could cause that
      • 2018-07-02 18327, 2018

      • zas
        i had to reload haproxy config to change backend weights, but i didn't change anything else
      • 2018-07-02 18334, 2018

      • zas
        samj1912: ^^ any idea?
      • 2018-07-02 18321, 2018

      • zas
        i switched haproxy to lb2 to see if it happens on both nodes, if it does i suspect a solr issue
      • 2018-07-02 18336, 2018

      • zas
        i upgraded, rebooted, and switched back to lb1
      • 2018-07-02 18342, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Maybe one server is having issues?
      • 2018-07-02 18351, 2018

      • reosarevok
        It's weird it works instantly sometimes, and not at all others
      • 2018-07-02 18356, 2018

      • reosarevok
        (also instantly)
      • 2018-07-02 18307, 2018

      • samj1912
        Huh
      • 2018-07-02 18312, 2018

      • samj1912
        Weird
      • 2018-07-02 18339, 2018

      • samj1912
        Probably related to one of the solr servers then
      • 2018-07-02 18313, 2018

      • samj1912
        Huh weird, it's sometimes returning results and sometimes not
      • 2018-07-02 18304, 2018

      • samj1912
        zas, can't find anything wrong but 4xx suddenly increased after 14:00 IST
      • 2018-07-02 18352, 2018

      • samj1912
        zas, did you change something recently?
      • 2018-07-02 18301, 2018

      • samj1912
        Solr response times went to shit
      • 2018-07-02 18326, 2018

      • samj1912
        zas, I am restarting all solr servers
      • 2018-07-02 18331, 2018

      • samj1912
        Something weird is happening
      • 2018-07-02 18344, 2018

      • samj1912
        Lots of 4xx suddenly
      • 2018-07-02 18331, 2018

      • ruaok
        yvanzo: FWIW the -vm build showed zero errors -- worked as expected.
      • 2018-07-02 18358, 2018

      • alastairp
        ruaok: my cooler works, but I think your management interfacer is better than mine: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/rC94aT3…
      • 2018-07-02 18312, 2018

      • samj1912
        also zas can you break those response codes by solr nodes?
      • 2018-07-02 18315, 2018

      • ruaok
        interesting. what happened circa 19h and 4:30h?
      • 2018-07-02 18324, 2018

      • alastairp
        oh, I added more ice :)
      • 2018-07-02 18314, 2018

      • ruaok
        do you have an icebox and then you ventilate from it?
      • 2018-07-02 18335, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Does the icebox have plums?
      • 2018-07-02 18339, 2018

      • alastairp
        yes, there's a fan that pulls cold air from an ice compartment into the main compartment
      • 2018-07-02 18343, 2018

      • alastairp
        reosarevok: they're delicious
      • 2018-07-02 18310, 2018

      • reosarevok is reminded of https://twitter.com/hels/status/1012449490396237824
      • 2018-07-02 18323, 2018

      • alastairp
        (I also lowered the target temperature at 6pm and 4am, so it pulled more cold air in)
      • 2018-07-02 18327, 2018

      • ZaphodBeeblebrox is now known as CatQuest
      • 2018-07-02 18343, 2018

      • alastairp
        with enough ice I can definitely lower the temperature 10° lower than ambient. I've not tried to pull it down more
      • 2018-07-02 18356, 2018

      • ruaok
        nice.
      • 2018-07-02 18304, 2018

      • reosarevok
        No, ice
      • 2018-07-02 18302, 2018

      • samj1912
        zas: lots of logs like
      • 2018-07-02 18306, 2018

      • samj1912
      • 2018-07-02 18321, 2018

      • ruaok
        proxy issue?
      • 2018-07-02 18331, 2018

      • yvanzo
        ruaok: the most breaking change is that base image are now made for Ubuntu Cloud using cloud-init.
      • 2018-07-02 18337, 2018

      • samj1912
        looks like it
      • 2018-07-02 18352, 2018

      • samj1912
      • 2018-07-02 18357, 2018

      • ruaok
        yvanzo: ok, what is our next step then?
      • 2018-07-02 18359, 2018

      • samj1912
        normal reqs should look like this
      • 2018-07-02 18307, 2018

      • yvanzo
        VM network settings can probably be simplified too.
      • 2018-07-02 18324, 2018

      • ruaok
        samj1912: I've pinged zas elsewhere too, hopefully we can get his attention.
      • 2018-07-02 18344, 2018

      • samj1912
        cool
      • 2018-07-02 18309, 2018

      • yvanzo
        ruaok: bento/ubuntu-16.04
      • 2018-07-02 18334, 2018

      • samj1912
        reosarevok: the above is probably why all those no result responses are occuring
      • 2018-07-02 18342, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Got it :)
      • 2018-07-02 18358, 2018

      • yvanzo
        it is lighter and probably requires less customization
      • 2018-07-02 18358, 2018

      • reosarevok
        I mean, they're instant, so it's not too bad yet
      • 2018-07-02 18300, 2018

      • iliekcomputers
      • 2018-07-02 18339, 2018

      • samj1912
        XD
      • 2018-07-02 18305, 2018

      • iliekcomputers
        😂
      • 2018-07-02 18320, 2018

      • zas
        samj1912: i just changed to weights, and did a config reload, i see nothing on haproxy side which may cause this
      • 2018-07-02 18346, 2018

      • samj1912
        zas: did you see the logs above?
      • 2018-07-02 18350, 2018

      • zas
        lol i know, i deleted some lines in the whitelist.... unintentionnally
      • 2018-07-02 18302, 2018

      • ruaok
        yvanzo: do you need me to make the changes?
      • 2018-07-02 18333, 2018

      • yvanzo
        nope, I’m creating a branch for that
      • 2018-07-02 18351, 2018

      • samj1912
        zas: one more thing btw - what happens when people with slave servers use solr?
      • 2018-07-02 18353, 2018

      • ruaok
        iliekcomputers: that's funny since we're still working samj to recognize what a weekend is. :)
      • 2018-07-02 18300, 2018

      • samj1912
        currently people can point to search.mb.org
      • 2018-07-02 18319, 2018

      • samj1912
        but that isnt currently possible with solr since non hetzner reqs are blocked
      • 2018-07-02 18302, 2018

      • ruaok
        sounds like we need to setup another proxy for that.
      • 2018-07-02 18323, 2018

      • samj1912
        okay 4xx are gone, but response times are still bad
      • 2018-07-02 18358, 2018

      • samj1912
      • 2018-07-02 18352, 2018

      • samj1912
        msg rates got double in the last 12 hrs
      • 2018-07-02 18307, 2018

      • samj1912
        was some new service deployed?
      • 2018-07-02 18311, 2018

      • zas
        no idea, about both
      • 2018-07-02 18340, 2018

      • samj1912
        ruaok: ^^ ?
      • 2018-07-02 18338, 2018

      • samj1912
      • 2018-07-02 18316, 2018

      • ruaok shrugs
      • 2018-07-02 18317, 2018

      • ruaok
        no clue.
      • 2018-07-02 18328, 2018

      • ruaok
        it doesn't look good, I can tell you that.
      • 2018-07-02 18330, 2018

      • ruaok
        #nothelping
      • 2018-07-02 18320, 2018

      • samj1912
        did anything change at around 11:03? (related to solr)
      • 2018-07-02 18350, 2018

      • ruaok
        I think you're the only person tinkering with this.
      • 2018-07-02 18314, 2018

      • samj1912
        nope, wasnt touching solr around that time
      • 2018-07-02 18333, 2018

      • samj1912
        also those rmq things are due to BQ jobs
      • 2018-07-02 18343, 2018

      • samj1912
        just checked the rmq admin dash
      • 2018-07-02 18354, 2018

      • ruaok
        oh, yeah first of the month.
      • 2018-07-02 18321, 2018

      • ruaok
        a bit late in the day though. iliekcomputers?
      • 2018-07-02 18344, 2018

      • samj1912
        started around 11 hrs ago
      • 2018-07-02 18309, 2018

      • samj1912
        *9
      • 2018-07-02 18337, 2018

      • ruaok
        oh, perfect. yes. all normal.
      • 2018-07-02 18351, 2018

      • ruaok
        but that graph should be updated. that doesn't relate to solr at all.
      • 2018-07-02 18359, 2018

      • ruaok
        just gets us all sketchy...
      • 2018-07-02 18317, 2018

      • samj1912
        yeah, its just a rmq graph
      • 2018-07-02 18325, 2018

      • samj1912
        we should add a sir filter to it
      • 2018-07-02 18358, 2018

      • samj1912 is still confused about solr timings
      • 2018-07-02 18345, 2018

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18319, 2018

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18335, 2018

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18338, 2018

      • ruaok
        yvanzo & zas: invoices please!
      • 2018-07-02 18325, 2018

      • yokel has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18354, 2018

      • iliekcomputers
        Leo_Verto: ping
      • 2018-07-02 18343, 2018

      • yokel joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18359, 2018

      • iliekcomputers
        re https://github.com/metabrainz/brainzutils-python/…, how do you plan to add integration tests? Try to do something similar to how integration tests work in LB (meaning a different docker-compose.yml).
      • 2018-07-02 18341, 2018

      • iliekcomputers
        Also, do you think we should just fix the unit tests in the PR and merge this and integration tests should be a different PR?
      • 2018-07-02 18315, 2018

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18317, 2018

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18334, 2018

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18346, 2018

      • rsh7 joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18335, 2018

      • yokel has quit
      • 2018-07-02 18314, 2018

      • yokel joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18325, 2018

      • Leo__Verto joined the channel
      • 2018-07-02 18326, 2018

      • Leo__Verto has quit