ishaanshah[m]: i'm gonna take a last look at your proposal today. haven't looked at it yet, so you might have done this already, but let's mention that we'll try to introduce typescript into the stack before or during community bonding.
2020-03-27 08754, 2020
shivam-kapila has quit
2020-03-27 08758, 2020
c1e0 joined the channel
2020-03-27 08756, 2020
zas
morning
2020-03-27 08759, 2020
zas
outsidecontext: what about releasing 2.3.2 sometimes soon?
2020-03-27 08730, 2020
c1e0_ joined the channel
2020-03-27 08734, 2020
c1e0 has quit
2020-03-27 08711, 2020
ruaok
speaking of releasing. I should push master to beta.
2020-03-27 08742, 2020
c1e0 joined the channel
2020-03-27 08715, 2020
c1e0_ has quit
2020-03-27 08742, 2020
outsidecontext
zas: fine for me. I just have to check how I have time.
ruaok: iliekcomputers: Hi. Did you have a look at my updated proposal ?
2020-03-27 08750, 2020
iliekcomputers
i'm gonna look at proposals today or tomorrow depending on how lazy i am.
2020-03-27 08702, 2020
ruaok
on my list for today. still not 100% awake yet -- I had some symptoms return so I am a bit foggy.
2020-03-27 08710, 2020
ruaok
I'll do my best.
2020-03-27 08741, 2020
shivam-kapila
iliekcomputers: Hah. Laziness is engineer's key.
2020-03-27 08707, 2020
shivam-kapila
ruaok: No problem. Take care. Dont let the virus take hold on you
2020-03-27 08745, 2020
prabal has quit
2020-03-27 08719, 2020
iliekcomputers
ruaok: i think we should postpone the hack weekend. I'll still be hanging around IRC, but given the whole situation, I'm not sure how productive either of us will be anyways.
2020-03-27 08747, 2020
ruaok
should we try and do a release?
2020-03-27 08754, 2020
iliekcomputers
let's look at if there are any code tasks blocking release and if so how big they are.
2020-03-27 08702, 2020
iliekcomputers
i don't think there are many to be honest
2020-03-27 08738, 2020
ruaok
k, sounds good. I'l focus on resting and reviewing proposals today.
ishaanshah[m]: I was observing your proposal and liked it. But had a basic thought in mind. Will the users be willing to see so many graphs? Some things look good graphically but some things like top artists albums etc would look better in terms of UI than graphs. But this is just a personal opinion.
2020-03-27 08745, 2020
CatQuest
oh no how did you break HP again :o
2020-03-27 08716, 2020
CatQuest
.. idk what is broken? the Extreme squeese of space?
2020-03-27 08728, 2020
CatQuest
buttons next to search is also like that
2020-03-27 08735, 2020
iliekcomputers
shivam-kapila: it's good to aim higher. we might decide eventually not to do as many as in the proposal, but it's nice to have choices in what we'll do
2020-03-27 08719, 2020
shivam-kapila
Some stats can shown in other ways rather than graphs
2020-03-27 08735, 2020
shivam-kapila
iliekcomputers: I mean that the stats are all meaningful. I was doubtful about the way to present them
Cyna: I'm not sure I understand the demo completely. Mainly, there are "Author" and "Publisher" fields on the basic information tab, but they also have their own tabs. How do you reconcile both?
2020-03-27 08734, 2020
Mr_Monkey
It's not clear to me why author and publisher have separate tabs, but the contents of the book don't. I think the importance of a book's content probably requires its own section.
2020-03-27 08734, 2020
Mr_Monkey
It's also unclear what the identifiers and external links refer to in contextual information (the title of the tab is also too vague). I think you should continue to clarify your sections and workflow, at this point it's much more important to have a solid user experience than a good demo :)
2020-03-27 08754, 2020
Mr_Monkey
i recommend again you go through the process of entering a few books to get a better feel of the current workflow
2020-03-27 08743, 2020
alastairp
🌊 good morning all
2020-03-27 08736, 2020
ruaok
moin
2020-03-27 08709, 2020
rohitdandamudi joined the channel
2020-03-27 08721, 2020
shivam-kapila
ruaok: Nothing urgent. Will we need something like `./develop.sh timescale` which connects to timescale?
2020-03-27 08742, 2020
alastairp
that would be nice
2020-03-27 08757, 2020
alastairp
it should be very similar to the psql one
2020-03-27 08725, 2020
shivam-kapila
Too much. Just needs user to enter password as it can't be passed as command line argument
2020-03-27 08744, 2020
shivam-kapila
Should I submit a PR?
2020-03-27 08707, 2020
ruaok
SURE
2020-03-27 08717, 2020
ruaok
eh sorry for shouting.
2020-03-27 08725, 2020
Cyna
Mr_Monkey: the Author and Publisher tabs are for those who have info on author and publisher. The basic info tab takes in consideration only the name of the author and publisher for a quick entry
2020-03-27 08723, 2020
Cyna
I couldn't come up with suitable name for contextual tab.. Its basically additional details of the book
2020-03-27 08722, 2020
Cyna
You can simply move forward with the preview and submit from the first tab without having to look at the other tabs as they are optional. The necessary info like author name and publisher name will already have been entered. Author and Publisher have seperate tabs if the editor wants to go into the specifics
2020-03-27 08748, 2020
Cyna
A newbie editor should have to look for identifiers and external links. He just has to fill in the basic information and be done with the edit
2020-03-27 08757, 2020
Cyna
Whereas the experienced editor who has a book with 15 works can go to the additional details to add all the work related to the book and therefore linking them. They name of the work will not necessary be the same as the name of the book
2020-03-27 08707, 2020
Cyna
I can remove author and publisher tab and have only basic information and additional details if that what is required
2020-03-27 08752, 2020
BrainzGit
[listenbrainz-server] shivam-kapila opened pull request #767 (timescale…add-timescale-to-develop.sh): LB-503: Add command to connect to Timescale DB via develop.sh https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-server…
