#metabrainz

reosarevok: it's not relevant for artists that have new pages elsewhere, but it's still relevant for most artists of that era.

akshaaatt[m]: for drafts, sharing on forums is enough. no need for a gdoc. you have already got that covered.

i dont think you need to ping anyone else in particular.

no LB proposals this year so far? :(

yvanzo: https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-11542 no idea what to do about the album links

MBS-11542: Update Classical Archives URL format

Allow both types, or block new and ask users to click "Classic CA" and paste the resulting ID instead?

Or I guess we could use the new format for those since it's the default, and clean up the 23 we have by hand :p

[musicbrainz-server] reosarevok opened pull request #2033 (master…MBS-11542): MBS-11542 / MBS-11552: Allow and cleanup new Classical Archives links + add validation https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-serve...

Put the rest of it up for now, because it's better to allow all but Album than no new links at all ^

iliekcomputers, yeah :(. but one student was discussing applying for the mini reviews idea a couple of days here.

is it just me or less students seem to be participating in gsoc this year?

I feel the same.

Its not less students participating but less confindent do take it up.

BTW there are 1-2 people interested in LB and have asked a few questions over DM. I had advised them to discuss on channel but I am not sure if they are hesitant.

<_lucifer "akshaaatt: for drafts, sharing o"> Thanks a lot @_lu

> <@freenode__lucifer:matrix.org> akshaaatt: for drafts, sharing on forums is enough. no need for a gdoc. you have already got that covered.

* Thanks a lot _lucifer . One final head-ups on https://community.metabrainz.org/t/gsoc-2021-mu... from you and then I'll share the draft from Google's end and get back to working on the app and hopefully make a few more contributions 😇

akshaaatt[m]: you can go ahead and share the draft though google portal. i currently do not have further feedback. if i do later, i will share it on the community post. you can incorporate that in your final proposal.

<_lucifer "akshaaatt: you can go ahead and "> Thank you so much 😇

[musicbrainz-server] reosarevok opened pull request #2034 (master…MBS-11553): MBS-11553: Move from passing $c to React.useContext in layout pages https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-serve...

bitmap: when you have some time can you take a second look at https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-serve... ? Would be nice to merge that since it touches a ton of things :)

[bookbrainz-site] akashgp09 opened pull request #593 (master…merge-queue-buttons): FIX(BB-606): Buttons overlapping in merge entity section https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/p...

forgot to mention that using the authenticator app invloved using my yubikey as well

I agree. And it's not like you actually have any choice in the matter.

maybe not using 2nd factor auth, that's currently my choice to have activated. but things are more and more pushing towards this, which I generally approve off. but that stuff has anyway become difficult to manage. even logging in to the most simple service sometimes feels like entering a high security facility :D

reosarevok: I would just allow both for now as it is likely to change on CA's side but we don't know how yet.

Is there an API endpoint to lookup a release mbid from a release msid?

Right now I'm using the recording-search on https://labs.api.listenbrainz.org but I'm wondering if there is a way that uses the release msid