Not that I could afford to eat that gelato very often if Google isn't paying :p
2015-11-05 30908, 2015
Freso
:)
2015-11-05 30920, 2015
Freso
I didn't actually get around to the stracciatella. :/
2015-11-05 30922, 2015
reosarevok
I went with the Guardian in the end, since I already had MB and SoundCloud for music and the like
2015-11-05 30933, 2015
reosarevok
Well next time
2015-11-05 30939, 2015
reosarevok
Weren't you thinking of moving there?
2015-11-05 30939, 2015
Freso
I was planning to do that on Monday, but then we never went there on Monday.
2015-11-05 30943, 2015
reosarevok
WHAT
2015-11-05 30946, 2015
Freso
Yeah.
2015-11-05 30948, 2015
reosarevok
You SKIPPED THE GELATO?
2015-11-05 30954, 2015
Freso
Ikr. ;_;
2015-11-05 30954, 2015
reosarevok
That's... crazy
2015-11-05 30915, 2015
Freso
OpenStreetMaps, maybe.
2015-11-05 30934, 2015
chirlu`
The basilicum gelato!
2015-11-05 30939, 2015
Freso
Or GeoNames?
2015-11-05 30944, 2015
reosarevok
I have enough APIs now! :p
2015-11-05 30954, 2015
reosarevok
But we'll probably have another API exercise in the future
2015-11-05 30959, 2015
reosarevok
So those are good ideas for then :)
2015-11-05 30909, 2015
reosarevok
Thanks!
2015-11-05 30903, 2015
reosarevok
Freso: you do have access to instrument adding, don't you?
2015-11-05 30924, 2015
reosarevok
(just remembered that ticket of yours and wanted to make sure since I'm not 100% sure what privilege allows that one)
2015-11-05 30928, 2015
Freso
reosarevok: I think that was revoked.
2015-11-05 30955, 2015
Freso
(Also, what ticket of mine? I've made a couple...)
2015-11-05 30910, 2015
reosarevok
The one about the Irish stuff I commented on (and fixed)
2015-11-05 30932, 2015
reosarevok
Take a look. You seem to be a relationship editor and I thought that was the involved priv
2015-11-05 30934, 2015
reosarevok
But maybe not
2015-11-05 30900, 2015
Freso
There used to be a separate priv. for the instrument tree, I think.
2015-11-05 30917, 2015
Freso
But that was before instruments were entities.
2015-11-05 30953, 2015
Freso
I do seem to have access to /instrument/$MBID/edit.
2015-11-05 30942, 2015
Freso
Ooh. "written in" <3
2015-11-05 30911, 2015
reosarevok
Yay
2015-11-05 30922, 2015
samphippen has quit
2015-11-05 30907, 2015
UmkaDK_
Hi everyone! :)
2015-11-05 30948, 2015
reosarevok
Hi!
2015-11-05 30951, 2015
reosarevok
What did we break this time!
2015-11-05 30908, 2015
Mineo
*everything*!
2015-11-05 30943, 2015
UmkaDK_
Errr… actually, nothing! :D
2015-11-05 30903, 2015
reosarevok
Wow. That's been a couple times already that we didn't break stuff!
2015-11-05 30908, 2015
reosarevok
Way to go, us
2015-11-05 30917, 2015
UmkaDK_
I'm just being the curious type and wondering if anyone could look into their crystal ball of future postgres updates! :)
2015-11-05 30931, 2015
reosarevok
zas, that's probably you
2015-11-05 30955, 2015
UmkaDK_
reosarevok: I'm trying to improve!! :)
2015-11-05 30944, 2015
Freso
UmkaDK_: We're going to up the pgsql version at next schema change.
2015-11-05 30953, 2015
Gentlecat
there was a plan to switch to 9.5 with the next schema change
2015-11-05 30909, 2015
Gentlecat
or 9.4, I don't remember
2015-11-05 30912, 2015
Freso
I can't remember the specific version though, but I think ... that Gentlecat would probably know. :p
2015-11-05 30918, 2015
UmkaDK_
Anyways, you know there was some talk about upgrading to postgresql 9.4 some time in the future… Does anyone know what new posgresql features will be required ...
2015-11-05 30919, 2015
Freso
Oh. Oh well then.
2015-11-05 30926, 2015
UmkaDK_
So I guess that means sometime in the … spring 2016?
2015-11-05 30959, 2015
Freso
May.
2015-11-05 30911, 2015
Freso
Schema change releases are May and October.
2015-11-05 30925, 2015
Freso
(But we skipped this October.)
2015-11-05 30940, 2015
UmkaDK_
Cool, thanks Freso!
2015-11-05 30935, 2015
UmkaDK_
I'm just trying to work out the timeline for the database upgrade and what else we'd have to do to prepare for it.
2015-11-05 30920, 2015
Freso
UmkaDK_: There will be a blog post about it in January, I believe. Maybe earlier if you beg ruaok to do it sooner.
2015-11-05 30951, 2015
samphippen joined the channel
2015-11-05 30911, 2015
UmkaDK_
No worries, I doubt the actual schema upgrade will present more problems then usual. It the database upgrade that I'm worried about. That's why I was asking if anyone knew which new features of pgsql 9.4 will be used.
2015-11-05 30947, 2015
UmkaDK_
But I guess I'll just wait for zas :)
2015-11-05 30942, 2015
zas
I don't know much on that yet, i guess bitmap or ruaok could do better answers on this
2015-11-05 30942, 2015
Freso
UmkaDK_: The JSON data type has been talked about some. Not sure which pgsql version that is from. Or whether we'll end up using it or not.
2015-11-05 30958, 2015
chirlu`
I dont think much in terms of new features will be used at first.
2015-11-05 30919, 2015
UmkaDK_
Thanks guys!! I guess I can start looking into JSON data type (just in case), and wait for more info from bitmap or ruaok.
2015-11-05 30922, 2015
chirlu`
JSONB perhaps, and upsert if we make the jump to 9.5.
2015-11-05 30947, 2015
chirlu`
Well benefit from performance improvements, though, such as index-only scans.
2015-11-05 30917, 2015
UmkaDK_
chirlu`: so you reckon I'll get away with running MB on the old db server (at least for a while)?
2015-11-05 30949, 2015
chirlu`
Possibly, but there are no guarantees. :-)
2015-11-05 30927, 2015
chirlu`
In particular, wed then probably be looking at the 9.4 or 9.5 documentation when writing new features and might not even notice when we use something that is post-9.1.
2015-11-05 30936, 2015
UmkaDK_
Sure, understood! :D
2015-11-05 30951, 2015
Nyanko-sensei has quit
2015-11-05 30923, 2015
Freso has quit
2015-11-05 30923, 2015
Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
2015-11-05 30927, 2015
Freso joined the channel
2015-11-05 30908, 2015
bitmap
UmkaDK_: I'll probably be looking at jsonb (9.4), upsert (9.5), and materialized views (9.3), but no specific plans yet
2015-11-05 30954, 2015
bitmap
certainly possible that some of these new features will be used in the release, because anything that requires downtime will be convenient to upgrade all at once
I clicked ruaok’s comment « <3 » on MBS-1801 « Rob is not Richard M. Stallman » line and then I wanted to store this comment back as it was bifore (not foreground) so I cliecked a “close” button and now his comment has disappeared ?!
2015-11-05 30907, 2015
jesus2099
is it still here for you and just hidden for me ? I don’t know how to revert this…
2015-11-05 30951, 2015
jesus2099
When I click Edit>Undo, it undoes MY comment, not my ruaok’s comment’s deletion
2015-11-05 30915, 2015
jesus2099 has quit
2015-11-05 30907, 2015
UmkaDK_
thanks bitmap!
2015-11-05 30918, 2015
bitmap
hmm, was a ticket ever added for enabling translations in production / adding 'help improve this translation' links?
2015-11-05 30925, 2015
bitmap
enabling them doesn't actually require any MBS changes, so I could do it now even :P but should probably add the links first
2015-11-05 30913, 2015
reosarevok
Hmm
2015-11-05 30918, 2015
reosarevok
Not for the second at least I don't think
2015-11-05 30920, 2015
reosarevok
Also
2015-11-05 30941, 2015
reosarevok
Making new mediums not fail a merge was three lines of code?
2015-11-05 30901, 2015
reosarevok
Gah I should have made someone change this back in 2011
2015-11-05 30915, 2015
bitmap
apparently so
2015-11-05 30913, 2015
bitmap
never saw anyone report it, would've fixed it sooner otherwise :)
2015-11-05 30930, 2015
reosarevok
Also, given the mailing list plan failed, should I re-add us to the jira mail-me-please-thingy?
2015-11-05 30934, 2015
reosarevok
(and see if it actually does)
2015-11-05 30930, 2015
bitmap
do we not know what the problem with the groups.io stuff is?
2015-11-05 30935, 2015
bitmap
but sure
2015-11-05 30948, 2015
reosarevok
Well I sure don't
2015-11-05 30910, 2015
reosarevok
As I mentioned, I saw the mails in the jira mail queue, they didn't appear in the error log, but neither did they make it to groups.io
2015-11-05 30918, 2015
reosarevok
So I'm stuck
2015-11-05 30927, 2015
bitmap
ah
2015-11-05 30945, 2015
reosarevok
Ok, added, let's fix some ticket and see if it mails :p
2015-11-05 30907, 2015
bitmap
:D
2015-11-05 30949, 2015
reosarevok
Or well, just add the ticket for those links :p
2015-11-05 30930, 2015
bitmap
added...
2015-11-05 30908, 2015
reosarevok
Come on jira you can do this
2015-11-05 30912, 2015
reosarevok
Yay got it
2015-11-05 30922, 2015
reosarevok
:)
2015-11-05 30937, 2015
regagain joined the channel
2015-11-05 30904, 2015
bitmap
good :)
2015-11-05 30923, 2015
reosarevok
Gentlecat: I should add you too, right?
2015-11-05 30901, 2015
bitmap did not get any email, wonders if it makes an exception for tickets you enter
2015-11-05 30916, 2015
reosarevok
It didn't use to...
2015-11-05 30924, 2015
reosarevok
Your username *is* bitmap, yes?
2015-11-05 30933, 2015
bitmap
yes
2015-11-05 30949, 2015
reosarevok
Oh
2015-11-05 30959, 2015
reosarevok
It didn't use to because it didn't mail us directly but the list
2015-11-05 30903, 2015
reosarevok
So yeah, that might be it
2015-11-05 30914, 2015
bitmap
okay, we'll see
2015-11-05 30946, 2015
samphippen has quit
2015-11-05 30909, 2015
chrisg has quit
2015-11-05 30921, 2015
samphippen joined the channel
2015-11-05 30927, 2015
reosarevok
bitmap: we don't actually have something to check for ended when writing link phrases, right?
2015-11-05 30943, 2015
bitmap
I doubt it
2015-11-05 30944, 2015
reosarevok
(was wondering about "{entity1} is/was an anthem of {entity0}")
2015-11-05 30945, 2015
reosarevok
Ok
2015-11-05 30959, 2015
reosarevok
Wonder if I should add a ticket or that's too nitpicky
2015-11-05 30916, 2015
reosarevok
(also, "of"? "for"?
2015-11-05 30917, 2015
reosarevok
)
2015-11-05 30948, 2015
diana_olhovik_ has quit
2015-11-05 30935, 2015
chrisg joined the channel
2015-11-05 30922, 2015
bitmap
hmm. both work I guess
2015-11-05 30904, 2015
reosarevok
Ok, I'll keep "of" then since it's what we had
2015-11-05 30929, 2015
bitmap
wouldn't that mean two sets of link phrases for all the ones that support dates?
2015-11-05 30954, 2015
reosarevok
Well, not necessarily
2015-11-05 30909, 2015
reosarevok
I mean, a work was written, not is being/was written
2015-11-05 30931, 2015
reosarevok
Basically, we already have stuff like
2015-11-05 30932, 2015
reosarevok
The lyrics for {entity1} were {additional:additionally} written in {entity0}
