so, I'm picking the tickets that have outside impact.
2016-03-15 07552, 2016
Freso
I think that's a reasonable approach.
2016-03-15 07507, 2016
ruaok
8838, 6024, 4501 are the tickets I am inclined to explain.
2016-03-15 07512, 2016
ruaok
should I take on others?
2016-03-15 07518, 2016
chirlu
You should probably mention (without details) that some indexes will change.
2016-03-15 07501, 2016
chirlu
And if there are people who somehow work with edits (even though they aren’t replicated), that they should look more closely because table layout for the edit table is going to change.
2016-03-15 07513, 2016
chirlu
But I expect there aren’t any.
2016-03-15 07526, 2016
ruaok
agreed.
2016-03-15 07547, 2016
ruaok
now, PG 9.4 or 9.5. I forget if we came to a conclusion.
2016-03-15 07514, 2016
chirlu
Finally, we’ll no longer depend on the plperlu extension, but instead on earthdistance. (Both are distributed with Pg and in the same -contrib package for Debian/Ubuntu.)
2016-03-15 07517, 2016
chirlu
9.5.
2016-03-15 07528, 2016
ruaok
k
2016-03-15 07533, 2016
ruaok has his marching orders
2016-03-15 07501, 2016
chirlu
As far as I saw on the blog post, no-one protested (after they learned there is a repo for 9.5 on older base systems) and some even said 9.5 was easier for them.
outsidecontext: Does it cache the cover art in its local Discourse cache? Have you tried adding CAA and/or archive.org to the list of domains not to cache from and see if it still does?
2016-03-15 07541, 2016
chirlu
alastairp: Yes, I think so, too.
2016-03-15 07554, 2016
outsidecontext
Freso: The whole box is cached, and AFAIK for existing posts it gets saved to the post and never reloads until someone edits it (or one runs some administrative task on the server)
2016-03-15 07523, 2016
alastairp
chirlu: that's for confirmation. linked
2016-03-15 07529, 2016
alastairp
*thanks
2016-03-15 07552, 2016
Freso
outsidecontext: Well, the box isn't cached as an image. :) But I guess it doesn't matter much.
2016-03-15 07531, 2016
chirlu
I do think Discourse renders the post once (including boxes) and stores the HTML.
2016-03-15 07551, 2016
CatQuest wouldn't be opposed to there being a "disclosure clause" thingy for automods either. like "you promise not to so and such"
2016-03-15 07538, 2016
chirlu
But autoeditors can’t see any additional data, can they?
2016-03-15 07520, 2016
outsidecontext
Freso: Ah, the image itself is directly linked to the URL given. not sure if you can route it over discourse
2016-03-15 07531, 2016
Freso
outsidecontext: Well, I don't want to. :p
2016-03-15 07553, 2016
Freso
outsidecontext: I've already added archive.org and CAA to places not to cache from to comm.meb. :)
2016-03-15 07542, 2016
CatQuest
yea maybe they can't, but there in the future, not for extra data .. well there'd have to maybe be one for spamfighters atleast
2016-03-15 07544, 2016
outsidecontext
ok, than it should be fine as it is. the cache settings should not affect the image loading at all
2016-03-15 07525, 2016
CatQuest just likes there to be an extra "yes I agree not to be a dick" legal or something
2016-03-15 07555, 2016
CatQuest
nothing long. a "automod manifesto"
2016-03-15 07508, 2016
Freso
I think that's going to be a bit harder. :)
2016-03-15 07516, 2016
armalcolite has quit
2016-03-15 07541, 2016
CatQuest
sort of an adition ot code of conduct that's spesific for autoeditors and then have coc edited to be universal
2016-03-15 07505, 2016
CatQuest
maybenot legal leagal, but you have to read it and agree to it before you cna be an autoeditr
2016-03-15 07523, 2016
CatQuest
and if you severally breka it you cna be deOped
2016-03-15 07528, 2016
chirlu
Also for spam fighters, there is no promise in the privacy policy that “we will hide your biography/website as long as you have no verified email address”.
2016-03-15 07544, 2016
vidhan joined the channel
2016-03-15 07520, 2016
CatQuest
oh yea, I just assumed maybe spam fighters would be able (for the ability to just up and delete accounts ) be able to see more details, like maybe emails
2016-03-15 07501, 2016
Freso
I definitely want to do a CoC rewrite to make it universal for all our projects/sites.
2016-03-15 07511, 2016
Freso
It's on The List...
2016-03-15 07528, 2016
CatQuest
I mean universal fo rall editor types but yes
2016-03-15 07504, 2016
CatQuest
and then have seperate addiotns that go for speisif classes of editor
2016-03-15 07523, 2016
CatQuest
ie "with more power comes greater responisiblity ie rules"
chirlu: yes. the thing isalso that many of those should be general not just for autoeditors. the part of auto's should be "and in addition ae should:.."
2016-03-15 07529, 2016
ruaok
man, what a difference to our friends up the street here.
2016-03-15 07514, 2016
CatQuest
hmm i tthik the coc might have ee namended since lst iread it, ok never midn me thne :D
What you want is a contract with volunteers...but you must give them something or it is not a valid agreement.
2016-03-15 07517, 2016
chrisskye
Am I making any sense?
2016-03-15 07520, 2016
ruaok
so, ideally we would like a short agreement that binds people to not disclose any sort of information that they may come in contact with while they do volunteer work.
2016-03-15 07536, 2016
ruaok
chrisskye: yes, making sense.
2016-03-15 07539, 2016
chirlu
“Reasonable exceptions may apply to the above policy …”
2016-03-15 07541, 2016
chrisskye
ok...so what is the exchange?
2016-03-15 07558, 2016
Freso
Elevated privileges and granted trust?
2016-03-15 07559, 2016
ruaok
no real exchange.
2016-03-15 07502, 2016
chrisskye
You can promote policy, but you can not enforce policy.
2016-03-15 07509, 2016
ruaok
it is a basis of volunteer work.
2016-03-15 07524, 2016
chrisskye
Listen...you can’t get a contract without an exchange. You might have to pay them a $1 or something...
