it contains > GCI trip: Reimbursement of on-plane wifi, additional luggage fees, transport to/from home/airport, food/drinks en route, dinner on 11th, lunch on 12th
2016-07-13 19518, 2016
ruaok
that is now on a separate invoice.
2016-07-13 19533, 2016
Freso
One that was made for Google, yes?
2016-07-13 19546, 2016
ruaok
yes
2016-07-13 19542, 2016
Freso
ruaok: Some of the things on the Google invoice you reimbursed me for last month.
2016-07-13 19507, 2016
Freso
(ESTA, slight seats.)
2016-07-13 19512, 2016
Freso
*flight
2016-07-13 19538, 2016
ruaok
joy. this keeps getting more complicated. can you guess the solution?
2016-07-13 19548, 2016
Freso
I mean, if you want to reimburse me again, that's great, but I thought the Google one was for sending to Google.
2016-07-13 19511, 2016
ruaok
there are two goals at play here:
2016-07-13 19517, 2016
ruaok
1) documenting what I need to pay you
2016-07-13 19526, 2016
ruaok
2) documentation what google needs to pay MeB.
2016-07-13 19543, 2016
Freso
1) Monthly invoice sent a few days ago.
2016-07-13 19553, 2016
Freso
2) USD invoice sent yesterday.
2016-07-13 19528, 2016
ruaok
that doesn't cover it, does it
2016-07-13 19546, 2016
Freso
How so?
2016-07-13 19504, 2016
ruaok
the invoices are muddled.
2016-07-13 19521, 2016
Freso
?
2016-07-13 19551, 2016
ruaok
think of this as a series of git commits.
2016-07-13 19502, 2016
ruaok
each commit needs to be clear in its intent.
2016-07-13 19538, 2016
ruaok
1. monthly invoice that has NO EXPENSES.
2016-07-13 19508, 2016
ruaok
2. an expense invoice that contains expenses that you have been paid for, but google needs to be billed for.
2016-07-13 19528, 2016
ruaok
3. an expense invoice that contains expenses that you have not been paid for, but google needs to be billed for.
2016-07-13 19552, 2016
ruaok looks at invoice #38
2016-07-13 19540, 2016
Freso
4. an expense invoice that contains expenses that I have not been paid for, and that Google should not be billed for?
2016-07-13 19523, 2016
ruaok
like t-shirts?
2016-07-13 19546, 2016
Freso
And chocolate.
2016-07-13 19550, 2016
ruaok
yes.
2016-07-13 19555, 2016
Freso
Do you have what you need to send to Google? You said you only wanted to send them one invoice.
2016-07-13 19522, 2016
ruaok
I will worry about what to send to google once I can clearly understand the invoices you've sent me.
2016-07-13 19513, 2016
Freso
The one I sent you v2 of earlier are all the things Google needs to be billed for.
2016-07-13 19547, 2016
Freso
(Except for the flight tickets.)
2016-07-13 19553, 2016
UmkaDK_
ruaok, if you have a sec, can I pick your brain about the new hosting infrastructure?
2016-07-13 19551, 2016
ruaok
UmkaDK_: go
2016-07-13 19501, 2016
UmkaDK_
I'm just trying to anticipate what we'll need for the next schema upgrade and, looking at the last schema upgrade, the biggest issue for us is that we can't take the server offline for an upgrade with out providing some kind of fall back.
2016-07-13 19541, 2016
ruaok
just fyi, I'm leaning towards no further schema change this year.
2016-07-13 19510, 2016
ruaok
and, next may we should have extra capacity to handle the BBC traffic while you do an upgrade
2016-07-13 19529, 2016
UmkaDK_
Ohhh!! (That's good new from my point of view!) I'm guessing the last schema upgrade left an impression! :)
2016-07-13 19534, 2016
ruaok
well, we're going to spend a lot of time moving to NewHost and that leaves very little time for other features/bug fixes. I'd rather not do another schema change under those circumstances.
2016-07-13 19535, 2016
UmkaDK_
So you reckon after the new hosting infrastructure is upgraded you'd be able to sustain our traffic for a few hours?
2016-07-13 19559, 2016
UmkaDK_
I hear you!
2016-07-13 19511, 2016
ruaok
yes
2016-07-13 19519, 2016
ruaok
we're going to at least triple our capacity
2016-07-13 19541, 2016
ruaok
2000+ requests/second.
2016-07-13 19554, 2016
UmkaDK_
That is absolutely awesome!! You just made my day! :D
2016-07-13 19506, 2016
ruaok
send chocolate. :)
2016-07-13 19511, 2016
UmkaDK_
:D
2016-07-13 19541, 2016
UmkaDK_
One last question ... do you have any timeline for the hosting upgrade? (you said "spend a lot of time moving", my alarm bells are ringing) :)
2016-07-13 19524, 2016
ruaok
more or less once all of these bits are dockerized
Gentlecat: I'm conflicted about your suggestion about the dataset jobs endpoint
2016-07-13 19539, 2016
alastairp
it's a good point [whoops].
2016-07-13 19507, 2016
alastairp
but I'm not sure about having a few generic endpoints with parameters
2016-07-13 19547, 2016
alastairp
I think my preference is to have endpoints specifically for the tasks which we know we currently have
2016-07-13 19542, 2016
alastairp
regarding structure of the API, and changing it, I have no problem to add new endpoints as we need them, and then consolidate them in into a v2 in 6 months if we feel we have a better idea of how everything fits together
2016-07-13 19510, 2016
alastairp
I originally proposed a new blueprint because we have at least these endpoints for remote dataset evaluation: get datasets to process, get status of one job, get data for one job, set status of one job, submit results (same as set status?)
2016-07-13 19537, 2016
alastairp
I guess the first two are pretty generic, and could be also used on the website
2016-07-13 19534, 2016
Freso
Writing up/compiling these meeting notes really shows how different one week can be from the next. :)
2016-07-13 19551, 2016
Freso
(Esp. when doing 3 in a row.)
2016-07-13 19523, 2016
bitmap
ruaok: standard meeting time for the docker stuff today?
2016-07-13 19544, 2016
ruaok
I'd prefer sooner.
2016-07-13 19505, 2016
ruaok
let met see if I can finish one thing, then I can be ready.
