#metabrainz

/

      • surtin joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11743, 2017

      • armalcolite37 joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11731, 2017

      • armalcolite37 has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11755, 2017

      • drsaunder joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11714, 2017

      • samj1912 joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11709, 2017

      • drsaunder has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11754, 2017

      • d4rkie joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11755, 2017

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11717, 2017

      • drsaunders joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11720, 2017

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11727, 2017

      • d4rkie has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11710, 2017

      • drsaunders has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11740, 2017

      • drsaunders joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11751, 2017

      • samj1912 has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11708, 2017

      • regagain joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11736, 2017

      • outsidecontext joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11750, 2017

      • d4rkie joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11712, 2017

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11759, 2017

      • regagain has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11742, 2017

      • Mineo has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11742, 2017

      • d4rkie has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11711, 2017

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11757, 2017

      • ferbncode_ joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11728, 2017

      • drsaunders has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11721, 2017

      • ruaok
        SothoTalKer: is you code public. I wanna see how you're doing it wrong.
      • 2017-04-27 11729, 2017

      • pprkut joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11749, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        ruaok: not exactly public,but i dont mind showing it.
      • 2017-04-27 11701, 2017

      • ruaok
        why not just keep it on github?
      • 2017-04-27 11736, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        it's just a crappy python scipt :D
      • 2017-04-27 11702, 2017

      • ruaok
        I keep my crappy python scripts in github.
      • 2017-04-27 11752, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        i will just pastebin it for now
      • 2017-04-27 11756, 2017

      • iliekcomputers__ joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11732, 2017

      • SothoTalKer has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11705, 2017

      • d4rkie joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11722, 2017

      • samj1912 joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11754, 2017

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11714, 2017

      • SothoTalKer joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11757, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        and then my connection freaks out :x
      • 2017-04-27 11757, 2017

      • arbenina_ joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11711, 2017

      • ruaok
        is it performance anxienty?
      • 2017-04-27 11724, 2017

      • Freso
        You could use GitHub gist which would still give you version control (and has a git interface).
      • 2017-04-27 11745, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
      • 2017-04-27 11728, 2017

      • ruaok
        close tab! close tab!
      • 2017-04-27 11747, 2017

      • ruaok
        it could only be worse if it were MBtoExcel. :)
      • 2017-04-27 11734, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        dont worry, i import into openoffice :))
      • 2017-04-27 11704, 2017

      • Quesito
        Gentlecat: you around to discuss MEB-76?
      • 2017-04-27 11705, 2017

      • BrainzBot
        MEB-76: Improvements to the payment view https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MEB-76
      • 2017-04-27 11718, 2017

      • d4rkie has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11745, 2017

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2017-04-27 11748, 2017

      • ruaok
        how often does it error for you, SothoTalKer?
      • 2017-04-27 11704, 2017

      • ruaok
        this one little trick changed his crappy python script to be 9 inches longer!
      • 2017-04-27 11713, 2017

      • ruaok
        > Got 1000 releases from Musicbrainz
      • 2017-04-27 11717, 2017

      • ruaok
        in a little over 10 seconds.
      • 2017-04-27 11724, 2017

      • hugo_ has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11740, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        until some weeks ago i got no error at all. since then usually 1 or 2 times in 16 requests
      • 2017-04-27 11714, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        even with a long delay like 5 seconds
      • 2017-04-27 11705, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        ruaok: i just made the script because i wanted sortable output ^^;
      • 2017-04-27 11714, 2017

      • ruaok
        2000 releases fetched, no errors
      • 2017-04-27 11720, 2017

      • ruaok
      • 2017-04-27 11700, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        i tried the chrome header before, at first it worked, then the errors came back
      • 2017-04-27 11709, 2017

      • ruaok
        I think you're setting the headers incorrectly.
      • 2017-04-27 11701, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        hum
      • 2017-04-27 11715, 2017

      • ruaok
        try my way and see if it improves.
      • 2017-04-27 11741, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        you mean i should totally clobber the header and just submit the UA?
      • 2017-04-27 11746, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        indeed, i checked, it does not update the user-agent '-'
      • 2017-04-27 11738, 2017

      • agentsim has quit
      • 2017-04-27 11704, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        ruaok: thanks. i found my error. i thought i could modify the default_headers directly. but that's not the case :)
      • 2017-04-27 11746, 2017

      • ruaok
        pro tip for programmers: if the problem seems to happen only to you, it is likely your fault and not the servers.
      • 2017-04-27 11757, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        well... we will see if it works fine in the evening, too :p
      • 2017-04-27 11735, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        right now it does not give an error, even with the 'defaults' and a request interval of 1 second.
      • 2017-04-27 11715, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        i will check that in 10-12 hours again
      • 2017-04-27 11727, 2017

      • Quesito
        Gentlecat I'll be on, off and around today--I left comments in MEB-76 to continue the discussion! :) let me know when you've taken a look.
      • 2017-04-27 11727, 2017

      • BrainzBot
        MEB-76: Improvements to the payment view https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MEB-76
      • 2017-04-27 11743, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        Quesito: why is showing the amount and the email not wanted? o.o
      • 2017-04-27 11755, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        oh, the fee. sorry :D
      • 2017-04-27 11726, 2017

      • Quesito
        yeah--the amount yes , the other two not really important on this page.
      • 2017-04-27 11727, 2017

      • Quesito
        :)
      • 2017-04-27 11701, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        ok :)
      • 2017-04-27 11712, 2017

      • SothoTalKer
        what if 2 people have the same name?
      • 2017-04-27 11704, 2017

      • Freso
        The more Randy Leisure, the merrier!
      • 2017-04-27 11709, 2017

      • Quesito
        I believe (although could be wrong) that the email is still collected within the data--we are simply asking for it not to be shown on the table unless you view that payment--and then you'd see all the inputed data including email. but maybe I'm wrong...!
      • 2017-04-27 11721, 2017

      • Quesito
        also ditto Freso ;)
      • 2017-04-27 11725, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        Quesito: I'm here now
      • 2017-04-27 11753, 2017

      • Quesito
        awesome! I'm still here! :)
      • 2017-04-27 11706, 2017

      • Quesito
        so what is the scoop on company name?
      • 2017-04-27 11706, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        we can add it to the payment table, but I'm not sure where to get that data from
      • 2017-04-27 11724, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        I can check whether stripe/paypal provide this kind of info
      • 2017-04-27 11730, 2017

      • Quesito
        is the payment table not linked to the user database?
      • 2017-04-27 11740, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        no, it's not. that's the thing
      • 2017-04-27 11748, 2017

      • Quesito
        hmmmm. why?
      • 2017-04-27 11712, 2017

      • Quesito
        I'm asking a lot of things--cause I don't understand, sorry. :D
      • 2017-04-27 11717, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        because people don't need to log in to make a payment
      • 2017-04-27 11724, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        no worries
      • 2017-04-27 11729, 2017

      • Quesito
        ahhh
      • 2017-04-27 11757, 2017

      • Quesito
        but they have to fill out the form to make a payment ? correct?
      • 2017-04-27 11716, 2017

      • Gentlecat
      • 2017-04-27 11735, 2017

      • Quesito
        yeah--and if I click on a user in on that page
      • 2017-04-27 11742, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        the only other thing we have apart from payment details is an invoice number
      • 2017-04-27 11748, 2017

      • Quesito
        I get a form with a bunch of info they have to type in, no?
      • 2017-04-27 11715, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        but there's still no way to map that to a user automatically because it's not recorded anywhere in the db outside of payments
      • 2017-04-27 11722, 2017

      • Quesito
        right
      • 2017-04-27 11739, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        not sure what you mean by clicking on a user
      • 2017-04-27 11700, 2017

      • Quesito
        click the edit icon and you get the payment details
      • 2017-04-27 11727, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        oh, in the admin interface?
      • 2017-04-27 11729, 2017

      • Quesito
        (I am failing at technical lingo, always....sorry again!)
      • 2017-04-27 11731, 2017

      • Quesito
        yes
      • 2017-04-27 11751, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        this all comes from one of the payment processors
      • 2017-04-27 11709, 2017

      • Quesito
        first things first--we are dicussing the admin view, correct?
      • 2017-04-27 11715, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        some of this info people provide to them and we get it back
      • 2017-04-27 11728, 2017

      • Quesito
        ah....the payment processors. I get it....
      • 2017-04-27 11746, 2017

      • Quesito
        hmmmm
      • 2017-04-27 11747, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        that's what I'm currently improving as per that ticket, yes
      • 2017-04-27 11731, 2017

      • Quesito
        but we do receive the persons musicbrainz ID
      • 2017-04-27 11734, 2017

      • Quesito
        ?
      • 2017-04-27 11722, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        only for donations and only if they provided it
      • 2017-04-27 11735, 2017

      • Quesito
        ok
      • 2017-04-27 11738, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        it might also be incorrect, there's no validation
      • 2017-04-27 11746, 2017

      • Quesito
        right.
      • 2017-04-27 11755, 2017

      • ruaok
        Quesito: the problem is that having to log in to make a payment is one more barrier to making payments.
      • 2017-04-27 11701, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        one thing we could do is require people to log in to make a payment
      • 2017-04-27 11709, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        right
      • 2017-04-27 11716, 2017

      • ruaok
        right now the engineers have access to the meb account for token generation.
      • 2017-04-27 11721, 2017

      • Quesito
        ok right
      • 2017-04-27 11745, 2017

      • ruaok
        we should not make anymore log in to make a payment. yes, it would be ideal for use to receive that data, but that simply does not work in the corporate world.
      • 2017-04-27 11738, 2017

      • Quesito
        now that i understand our set-up, I am thinking about this in a different way....
      • 2017-04-27 11701, 2017

      • Quesito
        ruaok: did you have a log-in required at any time in the MeB history?
      • 2017-04-27 11714, 2017

      • ruaok
        not for payments, never.
      • 2017-04-27 11754, 2017

      • Quesito
        also general question: why in 2017 is making a payment so f-ing complicated? this was supposed to become easier by now.....
      • 2017-04-27 11716, 2017

      • ruaok
        banks.
      • 2017-04-27 11727, 2017

      • ruaok
        too big, too vested, too complacent.
      • 2017-04-27 11702, 2017

      • iliekcomputers__
        let's replace banks! :)
      • 2017-04-27 11706, 2017

      • Quesito
        this payment admin view--we only see donations (as far as I can see), no?
      • 2017-04-27 11707, 2017

      • iliekcomputers__
        bitcoin ftw :)
      • 2017-04-27 11728, 2017

      • ruaok
        far from it, iliekcomputers__.
      • 2017-04-27 11750, 2017

      • ruaok
        I want to expose us to less uncertainty financially. not more.
      • 2017-04-27 11758, 2017

      • Quesito
        lets return to bartering....seems faster than banks, paypal, etc....and no logins!
      • 2017-04-27 11708, 2017

      • Quesito
        j/k
      • 2017-04-27 11719, 2017

      • iliekcomputers__ was kidding too :P
      • 2017-04-27 11742, 2017

      • iliekcomputers__
        I finally got the time to fix my PR today :O
      • 2017-04-27 11757, 2017

      • Quesito
        ok this payment admin view is soley for donations correct?
      • 2017-04-27 11703, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        Quesito: no
      • 2017-04-27 11716, 2017

      • Quesito
        hmmm why do I only see donations/
      • 2017-04-27 11720, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        I think it's just because there are more donation than payments
      • 2017-04-27 11725, 2017

      • ruaok
        we care more about payments.
      • 2017-04-27 11701, 2017

      • Quesito
        ok--Gentlecat-- I think the first thing you should tackle is making the sorting arrows work
      • 2017-04-27 11717, 2017

      • ruaok
        +1
      • 2017-04-27 11737, 2017

      • Quesito
        this will help us navigate the rest of the ticket and give me some time to think about other options for org name/company name etc.
      • 2017-04-27 11743, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        well, I'll just do the basic sorting by date for now as the ticket requests
      • 2017-04-27 11701, 2017

      • Gentlecat
        if you need something more advanced, I can try to do that next
      • 2017-04-27 11715, 2017

      • Quesito
        and you too--please let me know if you have another idea of how to get this data within the table--even if it's an outside the box idea