I don't think any PR for a script was submitted, but the rest have been merged. I thought they were included in monday's release, but I see now they weren't
2017-06-26 17759, 2017
bitmap
I can hotfix those today
2017-06-26 17727, 2017
ruaok
but the PR for the spammer removal script is still coming, yes?
2017-06-26 17743, 2017
bitmap
IIRC yvanzo was working on that, yes
2017-06-26 17747, 2017
ruaok
ok, great.
2017-06-26 17754, 2017
ruaok
don't worry about the hotfix.
2017-06-26 17754, 2017
yvanzo
Unconfirmed and spammers accounts can be removed this week without notice (resp. MBS-9357 and MBS-9358).
ah, good. I guess because the /collection block in robots.txt was deployed already
2017-06-26 17752, 2017
ruaok
then I can jump in and have another look at the current state of things
2017-06-26 17708, 2017
yvanzo
(actually PRs are in master branch already)
2017-06-26 17722, 2017
ruaok
I'll collect more info and then we should circle the wagons and plan the next wave. zas is collecting some ideas and I want more thoughts from more people as well.
2017-06-26 17744, 2017
ruaok
please ping me after the spammer removal script has been run.
2017-06-26 17746, 2017
Freso
Next?
2017-06-26 17749, 2017
yvanzo
Beyond that, I have been working on an admin UI for reviewing potential spammer accounts.
2017-06-26 17702, 2017
ruaok
perhaps have some very informal report of what the number of accounts removed was?
2017-06-26 17703, 2017
Freso shuts up
2017-06-26 17719, 2017
ruaok
Freso: onward, I think this is closing now.
2017-06-26 17723, 2017
Freso
Alright.
2017-06-26 17728, 2017
Freso
Freso: Picard meetings
2017-06-26 17728, 2017
ruaok
thanks yvanzo and bitmap
2017-06-26 17741, 2017
Freso
zas, samj1912, Mineo, bitmap, Sophist-UK, ...
2017-06-26 17743, 2017
yvanzo
Yes, and I will save accounts data before removing it.
2017-06-26 17701, 2017
samj1912
Yes im here
2017-06-26 17716, 2017
samj1912
Can you expand on the topic?
2017-06-26 17718, 2017
Freso
Nobody "showed up" for last week's Picard meeting. Do we still want to have weekly Picard meetings, or are we far enough along now that issues can be taken up at these Monday meetings instead?
2017-06-26 17723, 2017
Freso
samj1912: Yes: ^
2017-06-26 17742, 2017
samj1912
I think we have most of the stuff sorted out. And I will have to code all of it before we can proceed. Maybe we can continue when we feel the need for them again? Unless anyone else has anything they'd like to add or discuss?
2017-06-26 17751, 2017
Freso
Sounds good to me.
2017-06-26 17720, 2017
Freso
If anyone objects, we can take it up next Monday again, but let's call tomorrow off for now. :)
2017-06-26 17727, 2017
samj1912
Okay
2017-06-26 17730, 2017
Freso
reosarevok: classical
2017-06-26 17742, 2017
ruaok
6 minutes for classical. this will be great.
2017-06-26 17743, 2017
reosarevok
Quesito: people are asking on the blog what's the action plan for the classicla thing
2017-06-26 17746, 2017
ruaok
:-D
2017-06-26 17749, 2017
reosarevok
Do we actually have one? :p
2017-06-26 17756, 2017
ruaok
one is emerging.
2017-06-26 17702, 2017
TOPIC: MetaBrainz Community and Development channel | MusicBrainz non-development: #musicbrainz | MetaBrainz meeting agenda: reviews, Classical (reo)
2017-06-26 17703, 2017
samj1912
Actually the only thing on agenda is Sophist-UK s work thing. But he's been absent from irc recently
2017-06-26 17705, 2017
Quesito
yes--writing tonight to continue the org portion
2017-06-26 17717, 2017
Quesito
action plan:
2017-06-26 17727, 2017
reosarevok
They're asking about possible meetings, ideas, etc :) We should probably post about that
2017-06-26 17733, 2017
Quesito
step one form group if interest
2017-06-26 17745, 2017
Freso
reosarevok: Point them towards forum topic to being with?
2017-06-26 17750, 2017
Quesito
step two appoint leader.
2017-06-26 17754, 2017
reosarevok
Freso: *in* the topic
2017-06-26 17709, 2017
Quesito
step three....blah blah--I'll respond in kind this evening
2017-06-26 17712, 2017
Freso
Oh.
2017-06-26 17714, 2017
reosarevok
(people want a more concrete action plan to concentrate on)
2017-06-26 17718, 2017
reosarevok
Quesito: ok :)
2017-06-26 17722, 2017
ruaok
isn't it world domination?
2017-06-26 17728, 2017
ruaok
that should always be step 3.
2017-06-26 17728, 2017
Freso
reosarevok: You were talking about "on the blog" :p
2017-06-26 17729, 2017
reosarevok wonders if that's the thing that he's supposed to regret
2017-06-26 17736, 2017
Quesito
I've been reading but unable to sit and get some concrete responses in order...
2017-06-26 17744, 2017
reosarevok
Freso: oh. duh. post is what I meant
2017-06-26 17753, 2017
Freso
Right. :)
2017-06-26 17757, 2017
Quesito
yes--apologies ruaok step 3 is ALWAYS world domination ;)
2017-06-26 17716, 2017
ruaok
reosarevok: can you and I have a bit of a chat on this this week?
2017-06-26 17722, 2017
reosarevok
Sure
2017-06-26 17738, 2017
ruaok
because we talked about what was needed for classical and the conclusion was "UX, not schema changes".
2017-06-26 17741, 2017
ruaok
has that changed?
2017-06-26 17746, 2017
Quesito
it might be cool to have your eyes on it before i post reosarevok
2017-06-26 17715, 2017
reosarevok
ruaok: we *might* want some schema changes at some point, but UX before schema changes at least for sure
2017-06-26 17724, 2017
ruaok
ok.
2017-06-26 17725, 2017
reosarevok
Depends on what comes out of further discussion and whatnot :)
2017-06-26 17737, 2017
ruaok
ok.
2017-06-26 17740, 2017
reosarevok
Quesito: ping me :)
2017-06-26 17752, 2017
ruaok
might be good to close the meeting and then reosarevok and I chat for a minute.
2017-06-26 17700, 2017
ruaok
Freso?
2017-06-26 17703, 2017
Quesito
thank you reosarevok!
2017-06-26 17707, 2017
Freso
Sure.
2017-06-26 17723, 2017
Freso
I don't really have any closing remarks.
2017-06-26 17727, 2017
Freso
Thanks for your time.
2017-06-26 17731, 2017
Freso
</BANG>
2017-06-26 17736, 2017
ruaok
thanks Freso
2017-06-26 17740, 2017
Freso
👍
2017-06-26 17746, 2017
Quesito
woot!
2017-06-26 17755, 2017
TOPIC: MetaBrainz Community and Development channel | MusicBrainz non-development: #musicbrainz | MetaBrainz meeting agenda: reviews
2017-06-26 17700, 2017
ruaok
reosarevok: so, the thing we need to the most out of this conversation is some concrete points.
