#metabrainz

/

      • CatCat
        oh we ohuldn't send 0 or - voted tags trough ws
      • 2018-12-03 33748, 2018

      • reosarevok
        (just with the count so data users know about it)
      • 2018-12-03 33754, 2018

      • ruaok
        ok, I personally don't see a problem then.
      • 2018-12-03 33709, 2018

      • ruaok
        we get the community to downvote them and they are no longer shown.
      • 2018-12-03 33716, 2018

      • reosarevok
        They're still shown, just not by default
      • 2018-12-03 33729, 2018

      • ruaok
        yes, that's fine by me.
      • 2018-12-03 33731, 2018

      • CatCat
        that's tags though. anyone can add any tag to anything
      • 2018-12-03 33739, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Not fine by the non-nazi band, though :p
      • 2018-12-03 33746, 2018

      • reosarevok
        (that's the first thing I explained)
      • 2018-12-03 33748, 2018

      • ruaok
        I really dislike the idea of us going in and nuking people's tags.
      • 2018-12-03 33750, 2018

      • CatCat
        even like "musicbrainz are cunts" and thne it'll still *be* there
      • 2018-12-03 33705, 2018

      • ruaok
        unless the tags themselves are hate speech, we shouldn't remove them.
      • 2018-12-03 33709, 2018

      • CatCat
        no matter how many peopel downwote it
      • 2018-12-03 33720, 2018

      • iliekcomputers
        can we see who added the tags?
      • 2018-12-03 33726, 2018

      • Freso
        iliekcomputers: No.
      • 2018-12-03 33743, 2018

      • Freso
        Well, you could in the db I guess, but not anywhere in the interface.
      • 2018-12-03 33750, 2018

      • iliekcomputers
        maybe someone could reach out to them and ask them to reconsider...
      • 2018-12-03 33756, 2018

      • CatCat
        you used to. but that was nuce
      • 2018-12-03 33757, 2018

      • ruaok
        I'm in favor and adding a note to when you show all the tags.
      • 2018-12-03 33703, 2018

      • reosarevok
        I know who added this specific one (it's a nice person and I've written to them since I think it was an error)
      • 2018-12-03 33703, 2018

      • CatCat
        i bleive becaseu and i thikn it was part of it
      • 2018-12-03 33712, 2018

      • yvanzo agrees with ruaok, we're not tag nazis ...
      • 2018-12-03 33713, 2018

      • ruaok
        "these tags were voted down for a reason. keep that in mind."
      • 2018-12-03 33717, 2018

      • reosarevok
        (but they might not even see it because they haven't been active in forever)
      • 2018-12-03 33720, 2018

      • CatCat
        becasue someoen told *mE* to undo soem tag i had doen sicne it was something they disagred with
      • 2018-12-03 33723, 2018

      • reosarevok
        ruaok: what about the ws?
      • 2018-12-03 33733, 2018

      • ruaok
        put the note in the docs.
      • 2018-12-03 33750, 2018

      • CatCat
        I think we shouldn't include -tagged things under a spesific treshold in the ws
      • 2018-12-03 33758, 2018

      • ruaok
        or don't return them by default and add a flag to return them.
      • 2018-12-03 33712, 2018

      • reosarevok
        I think we should, but I wouldn't mind sending them as "downvoted tags". Probably shouldn't change it in ws/2 though
      • 2018-12-03 33713, 2018

      • CatCat
        yes
      • 2018-12-03 33722, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Maybe somebody depends on them being sent with everything
      • 2018-12-03 33725, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Ok, that works for me. It probably won't work for the band, but :p
      • 2018-12-03 33736, 2018

      • ruaok
        yeah, changing the data returned by the WS is haaaaard.
      • 2018-12-03 33753, 2018

      • reosarevok
        They mentioned asking the BBC to remove the MB link from their profile, which I assume the BBC can't do even if they wanted to, but
      • 2018-12-03 33716, 2018

      • Freso
        I mean, right now the offensive tags are pretty hidden.
      • 2018-12-03 33721, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Sure
      • 2018-12-03 33738, 2018

      • reosarevok
        I do wonder if there's any legal worries about it though
      • 2018-12-03 33740, 2018

      • Freso
        Anyone visiting their page will specifically have to first go to the "Tags" page/tab and then click the "Show hidden" "button".
      • 2018-12-03 33757, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Can a band say that either MB or a specific MB user is being libelous because they are falsely calling them nazis?
      • 2018-12-03 33734, 2018

      • ruaok
        > I do wonder if there's any legal worries about it though
      • 2018-12-03 33737, 2018

      • ruaok
        I am not worried
      • 2018-12-03 33725, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Is there a limit where we would start worrying?
      • 2018-12-03 33744, 2018

      • ruaok
        if we get a cease and desist on it.
      • 2018-12-03 33755, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Wouldn't mind hearing from a lawyer at some point if there is a point where we are expected to remove a tag if someone asks
      • 2018-12-03 33725, 2018

      • ruaok puts it on his list
      • 2018-12-03 33750, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Examples: this one, one where someone is outed as homosexual (whether true or not, unless publicly true)
      • 2018-12-03 33710, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Someone being tagged as, dunno, "criminal" or whatnot
      • 2018-12-03 33758, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Anyway, for now I guess I can tell the band that I did escalate as I said and got told that the current situation is considered good enough, but we'll add a note that says something about how downvoted tags are usually not considered correct
      • 2018-12-03 33718, 2018

      • Freso
        fin then?
      • 2018-12-03 33740, 2018

      • reosarevok
        I guess :) ruaok: does my last sentence sound like a sensible answer?
      • 2018-12-03 33759, 2018

      • ruaok
        yep
      • 2018-12-03 33704, 2018

      • Freso
        Alright then. No more items on this meeting's agenda. Thanks for your time everyone!
      • 2018-12-03 33706, 2018

      • CatCat
        not usually or usually not?
      • 2018-12-03 33712, 2018

      • Freso
        </BANG>
      • 2018-12-03 33717, 2018

      • Freso
        CatCat: Either works.
      • 2018-12-03 33724, 2018

      • Mr_Monkey
        Thanks Freso
      • 2018-12-03 33724, 2018

      • iliekcomputers
        thanks Freso
      • 2018-12-03 33726, 2018

      • CatCat woudl use the former for some reason
      • 2018-12-03 33732, 2018

      • CatCat
        thank you freso
      • 2018-12-03 33732, 2018

      • TOPIC: MetaBrainz Community and Development channel | MusicBrainz non-development: #musicbrainz | GSoC https://goo.gl/7jsjG2 | Meeting agenda: Reviews, Google Code-in (Freso)
      • 2018-12-03 33708, 2018

      • CatCat
        wait so. is it a thing for nazi bands to name themselves names that are the same as other, more popularly know things?
      • 2018-12-03 33713, 2018

      • CatCat
      • 2018-12-03 33720, 2018

      • CatCat
        "public enemy" ??
      • 2018-12-03 33735, 2018

      • CatCat
        though the problem if whoever first mistakenly added the tag removesi t. it still stays in that list with one less - vote isntead of beign removed
      • 2018-12-03 33712, 2018

      • michelv has quit
      • 2018-12-03 33718, 2018

      • code_master5
        iliekcomputers: CB-293 !
      • 2018-12-03 33718, 2018

      • BrainzBot
        CB-293: Allow rating entities from the entity page https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/CB-293
      • 2018-12-03 33753, 2018

      • code_master5
        iliekcomputers: We already have `Write a review` button on entity page. What are we planning to do here, exactly?
      • 2018-12-03 33726, 2018

      • reosarevok
        code_master5: Rate with no review I imagine
      • 2018-12-03 33718, 2018

      • code_master5
        reosarevok: You can rate without a review, already.
      • 2018-12-03 33735, 2018

      • reosarevok
        But do you still need to go through the Write a review page?
      • 2018-12-03 33740, 2018

      • reosarevok
        (haven't tried it in a while)
      • 2018-12-03 33749, 2018

      • code_master5
        reosarevok: Yes.
      • 2018-12-03 33729, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Ideally, it would work like in MusicBrainz or so - you click the stars on the sidebar (https://musicbrainz.org/release-group/3bd76d40-7f…) and you've rated it
      • 2018-12-03 33733, 2018

      • code_master5
        reosarevok: OK. I get it now. We need to have the rating UI on the entity page itself!
      • 2018-12-03 33758, 2018

      • code_master5
        What if user wants to write a review along with rating?
      • 2018-12-03 33709, 2018

      • reosarevok
        Then they should click Write a review :)
      • 2018-12-03 33754, 2018

      • code_master5
        reosarevok: Yeah! 😅
      • 2018-12-03 33703, 2018

      • reosarevok
        You could also have a small "Write a review" link under the stars I guess, depending how you show it - "Rate this artist/whatever {stars} or <a>write a review</a>"
      • 2018-12-03 33710, 2018

      • reosarevok
        I dunno, I suck at design :D
      • 2018-12-03 33739, 2018

      • bruce_r joined the channel
      • 2018-12-03 33703, 2018

      • c1e0_ has quit
      • 2018-12-03 33714, 2018

      • bukwurm has quit
      • 2018-12-03 33746, 2018

      • outsidecontext has quit
      • 2018-12-03 33722, 2018

      • bruce_r has quit
      • 2018-12-03 33748, 2018

      • code_master5 has quit
      • 2018-12-03 33739, 2018

      • Slurpee has quit