#metabrainz

/

      • prabal
        Also
      • 2020-03-31 09104, 2020

      • prabal
        Even if Edition Name = Work Name
      • 2020-03-31 09110, 2020

      • prabal
        i still have to add the name twice
      • 2020-03-31 09129, 2020

      • prabal
        And if I remember correctly that's something that should be avoided
      • 2020-03-31 09145, 2020

      • Cyna
        Ill add a copy option.. like the 2 window icon
      • 2020-03-31 09147, 2020

      • prabal
        Mr_Monkey mentioned this at project ideas page IG
      • 2020-03-31 09153, 2020

      • Cyna
        yea..
      • 2020-03-31 09110, 2020

      • Cyna
        I missed so many cases :(
      • 2020-03-31 09118, 2020

      • Cyna
        Thanks prabal :)
      • 2020-03-31 09108, 2020

      • prabal
        You're welcome :)
      • 2020-03-31 09125, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Good suggestions ther e!
      • 2020-03-31 09150, 2020

      • prabal
        Thanks :P
      • 2020-03-31 09157, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Cyna: I'm afraid once the proposals are posted that what we'll be going off of for selecting projects
      • 2020-03-31 09138, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey finally has a good reason to go outside, BBL
      • 2020-03-31 09105, 2020

      • d4rkie has quit
      • 2020-03-31 09154, 2020

      • SothoTalKer_ joined the channel
      • 2020-03-31 09111, 2020

      • SothoTalKer has quit
      • 2020-03-31 09119, 2020

      • Sophist-UK joined the channel
      • 2020-03-31 09156, 2020

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2020-03-31 09158, 2020

      • sweta05 has quit
      • 2020-03-31 09148, 2020

      • shivam-kapila has quit
      • 2020-03-31 09102, 2020

      • shivam-kapila joined the channel
      • 2020-03-31 09124, 2020

      • sweta05 joined the channel
      • 2020-03-31 09123, 2020

      • SothoTalKer_ has quit
      • 2020-03-31 09137, 2020

      • yvanzo
        ping back sir rohitdandamudi
      • 2020-03-31 09120, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yvanzo: yes, shall we finalize in google doc? or here?
      • 2020-03-31 09147, 2020

      • yvanzo
        the google doc will be the final version?
      • 2020-03-31 09115, 2020

      • c1e0 joined the channel
      • 2020-03-31 09132, 2020

      • yvanzo
        I mean it is not the same version as on the forum, right?
      • 2020-03-31 09149, 2020

      • yvanzo
        we can discuss here anyway
      • 2020-03-31 09105, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yvanzo: I have updated it(google doc)
      • 2020-03-31 09121, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        All changes that I made is underlined, so it’s easier for you to read and comment.
      • 2020-03-31 09126, 2020

      • yvanzo
        rohitdandamudi: Ok, please ping me when you updated the google doc according to comments on the forum.
      • 2020-03-31 09125, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yvanzo: Ok ..
      • 2020-03-31 09131, 2020

      • yvanzo
        Thanks!
      • 2020-03-31 09154, 2020

      • c1e0_ joined the channel
      • 2020-03-31 09114, 2020

      • c1e0 has quit
      • 2020-03-31 09158, 2020

      • yvanzo
        rohitdandamudi: the figure you just added looks nice!
      • 2020-03-31 09118, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        ruaok: Submitted final pdf. Thanks for your help :)
      • 2020-03-31 09128, 2020

      • ruaok
        yay, np
      • 2020-03-31 09123, 2020

      • yvanzo
        rohitdandamudi: on page 2, the <edited> snippet is the new version?
      • 2020-03-31 09143, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yup
      • 2020-03-31 09130, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yvanzo: made it more generalised as the implementation isn’t decided
      • 2020-03-31 09146, 2020

      • yvanzo
        is the doc stable enough to be discussed here? or do you need more time to edit it?
      • 2020-03-31 09123, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        give me 11 mins, will be done
      • 2020-03-31 09144, 2020

      • yvanzo
        cool :)
      • 2020-03-31 09139, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yvanzo: it’s done,
      • 2020-03-31 09113, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        please give review from beginning I hurried it.
      • 2020-03-31 09125, 2020

      • ruaok
        shivam-kapila: I just pushed more completed functions to the timescale branch. so far've not even checked if the code compiles.
      • 2020-03-31 09135, 2020

      • ruaok
        but hopefully I can finish this module today.
      • 2020-03-31 09144, 2020

      • alastairp
        last minute rush. this reminds me of school, and I don't miss it one bit
      • 2020-03-31 09156, 2020

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok merged pull request #1435 (beta…MBS-10722): MBS-10722: Entity list regression fixes https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2020-03-31 09157, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        MBS-10722: Beta: Applied release group merges aren't displayed due to ISE https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-10722
      • 2020-03-31 09104, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        ruaok: I also found wht was freezing my code
      • 2020-03-31 09128, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        I will those functions first
      • 2020-03-31 09107, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        A silly one. My proposal didnt need any changes now na?
      • 2020-03-31 09117, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        pull those functions*
      • 2020-03-31 09135, 2020

      • ruaok
        your proposal is done. don't worry about what we do with timescale in relation to your proposl.
      • 2020-03-31 09109, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        Just a bit tensed. Thank you :)
      • 2020-03-31 09137, 2020

      • reosarevok
        yvanzo: https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/… still seems to need a review?
      • 2020-03-31 09107, 2020

      • reosarevok
        (I get "it would have been helpful to split this patch" but it's still pretty small so hopefully it can be reviewed)
      • 2020-03-31 09124, 2020

      • yvanzo
        rohitdandamudi: do you have a link ot the readthedocs example you are showing?
      • 2020-03-31 09112, 2020

      • yvanzo
        reosarevok: how would you review it?
      • 2020-03-31 09157, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yvanzo: you mean the sampleBrainz doc website example?
      • 2020-03-31 09102, 2020

      • yvanzo
        yes
      • 2020-03-31 09132, 2020

      • reosarevok
        yvanzo: by checking if the headers seem to make sense, I guess?
      • 2020-03-31 09106, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I mean, before many of them didn't have any consistency anyway, so we might not even want to duplicate the old stuff
      • 2020-03-31 09107, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yvanzo: I have edited this site directly, https://acousticbrainz.readthedocs.io/
      • 2020-03-31 09121, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I'd rather you checked it as is and thought whether it seems sensible
      • 2020-03-31 09107, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        ruaok: isnt the ts missing connection to `SQLALCHEMY_TIMESCALE_URI`. There is not init_ts_connection
      • 2020-03-31 09134, 2020

      • ruaok
        say again, that wasn't very clear.
      • 2020-03-31 09136, 2020

      • yvanzo
        rohitdandamudi: alright
      • 2020-03-31 09108, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        We import ts from db.timescale.py. But we need to initialize the connection to timescale db by calling init_db_connection present in db.timescale.py. That connection is missing. Please correct me if I am going wrong
      • 2020-03-31 09124, 2020

      • ruaok
        in __init__ in timescalelistenstore.py ?
      • 2020-03-31 09140, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        yes
      • 2020-03-31 09101, 2020

      • ruaok
        yep. let me add it.
      • 2020-03-31 09149, 2020

      • ruaok
        ts.init_db_connection(conf['SQLALCHEMY_TIMESCALE_URI'])
      • 2020-03-31 09150, 2020

      • ruaok
        right?
      • 2020-03-31 09113, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        yes
      • 2020-03-31 09138, 2020

      • ruaok
        pushed.
      • 2020-03-31 09144, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        thanx
      • 2020-03-31 09104, 2020

      • yvanzo
        reosarevok: I already wrote that changes seem sensible (actually "reasonable")
      • 2020-03-31 09129, 2020

      • reosarevok
        But you didn't approve so I assumed you wanted to check more :)
      • 2020-03-31 09136, 2020

      • yvanzo
        but these are untraceable too, doesn't this comment make sense?
      • 2020-03-31 09118, 2020

      • yvanzo
        since you just went through old edits to check actual changes, it would have been nice to share your findings (as commit references) in commit messages.
      • 2020-03-31 09133, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Sure, I get that, for next time I can do that
      • 2020-03-31 09140, 2020

      • reosarevok
        For now - the relevant commits are mostly in this page: https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2020-03-31 09101, 2020

      • reosarevok
        (titled Convert whatever_list to React)
      • 2020-03-31 09120, 2020

      • yvanzo
        another point is it is supposed to be a fix for a bug in beta, not new changes that we won't have time to test in beta.
      • 2020-03-31 09109, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I mean, that didn't seem like a problem when I put it up six days ago
      • 2020-03-31 09121, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I expected to get it merged in a day or two and then it'd have had several days in beta
      • 2020-03-31 09130, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Just didn't realize it would take longer
      • 2020-03-31 09133, 2020

      • Cyna
        Hey Mr_Monkey, I just updated my proposal. Do have a look. Thanks :)
      • 2020-03-31 09144, 2020

      • yvanzo
        That was an issue 6 days ago, I made a comment about making the lesser possible change.
      • 2020-03-31 09133, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Yes, but why would we make a crap change that requires us to send yet another change immediately afterwards, when fixing it properly in one go is easy enough
      • 2020-03-31 09102, 2020

      • yvanzo
        to release in time? :D
      • 2020-03-31 09105, 2020

      • reosarevok
        (for a change that was more complex, I agreed, and separated the sorting bug fix and the sorting improvements)
      • 2020-03-31 09147, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I guess :p
      • 2020-03-31 09148, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Oh well
      • 2020-03-31 09143, 2020

      • yvanzo
        and I didn't approve because you didn't replied, now you pinged me I just did.
      • 2020-03-31 09144, 2020

      • yvanzo
        (not that I restrained from approving, I just already made a comment)
      • 2020-03-31 09153, 2020

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok merged pull request #1436 (beta…MBS-10723): MBS-10723: Separate className for cell and header https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2020-03-31 09155, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        MBS-10723: Beta: Text in length table header of "merge recording" edits turns red when there is a large spread https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-10723
      • 2020-03-31 09109, 2020

      • reosarevok
        yvanzo: ok, do you have time to release?
      • 2020-03-31 09107, 2020

      • yvanzo
        reosarevok: not now, trying to help rohitdandamudi with his proposal before deadline in a few hours.
      • 2020-03-31 09117, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Oh, ok
      • 2020-03-31 09122, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I guess I could give it a go?
      • 2020-03-31 09100, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I guess it'd be "release beta, give chaban or whoever a bit of time to see if something else broke, release prod"? :)
      • 2020-03-31 09132, 2020

      • yvanzo
        PRs have been merged into beta already, right?
      • 2020-03-31 09143, 2020

      • yvanzo
        maybe just retrieve latest translations before updating beta.mb.o
      • 2020-03-31 09102, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Ok
      • 2020-03-31 09101, 2020

      • reosarevok
        yvanzo: separately on master and beta?
      • 2020-03-31 09118, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Or I guess I should merge beta into master somehow, or rebase it
      • 2020-03-31 09116, 2020

      • yvanzo
        just update beta for now
      • 2020-03-31 09134, 2020

      • yvanzo
        beta will be merged in production that will be merged in master after release
      • 2020-03-31 09143, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Ok
      • 2020-03-31 09134, 2020

      • yvanzo
        thanks!
      • 2020-03-31 09140, 2020

      • _lucifer
        4 hours left in application deadline!
      • 2020-03-31 09157, 2020

      • gr0uch0mars
        Yeah!
      • 2020-03-31 09138, 2020

      • _lucifer
        It seems BookBrainz is the most popular *Brainz this year.
      • 2020-03-31 09144, 2020

      • yvanzo
        rohitdandamudi: no pressure ^^
      • 2020-03-31 09107, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        🥇
      • 2020-03-31 09144, 2020

      • _lucifer
        I think 50% of the proposals are for BookBrainz.
      • 2020-03-31 09151, 2020

      • _lucifer
        !m Mr_Monkey
      • 2020-03-31 09151, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        You're doing good work, Mr_Monkey!
      • 2020-03-31 09155, 2020

      • ruaok
        _lucifer: not really, no.
      • 2020-03-31 09157, 2020

      • alastairp
        Mr_Monkey will be busy this summer, then
      • 2020-03-31 09109, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Well, uh, I'm not doing the proposals, eh !
      • 2020-03-31 09144, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        I am getting so tensed haha
      • 2020-03-31 09158, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        me too 😶
      • 2020-03-31 09101, 2020

      • ruaok
        of the viable proposals I've seen, 2 LB, 1 AB, 2 MB, 1BB
      • 2020-03-31 09116, 2020

      • ruaok
        unless a pile just arrived.
      • 2020-03-31 09135, 2020

      • _lucifer
        Some proposals have not been tagged with GSoC
      • 2020-03-31 09138, 2020

      • Cyna
        Its getting to tense.. for sure
      • 2020-03-31 09110, 2020

      • ruaok
        _lucifer: I'm going why what is on the gsoc site.
      • 2020-03-31 09117, 2020

      • _lucifer
        Oh OK.
      • 2020-03-31 09118, 2020

      • ruaok
        s/why/on
      • 2020-03-31 09142, 2020

      • ruaok
        which is the only thing that matters. and I've already set a pile of proposals to ignore.
      • 2020-03-31 09154, 2020

      • ruaok
        e.g if this is the first time I hear from you, bang, you're gone.
      • 2020-03-31 09112, 2020

      • _lucifer
        Yeah, makes sense.
      • 2020-03-31 09113, 2020

      • yvanzo
        rohitdandamudi: please ping me when you are done with diagrams and references so we can discuss the timeline finally. :)
      • 2020-03-31 09125, 2020

      • rohitdandamudi
        yvanzo: fine :)
      • 2020-03-31 09116, 2020

      • _lucifer
        The proposal is a document after all. Real work says more than a document.
      • 2020-03-31 09151, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        documents can very much be real work :D
      • 2020-03-31 09101, 2020

      • ruaok
        and useless at the same time.
      • 2020-03-31 09106, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        yeah, depends on the document
      • 2020-03-31 09140, 2020

      • reosarevok
        chaban: new beta out, do you have time to try to break it for a little while before I release it on production?
      • 2020-03-31 09142, 2020

      • _lucifer
        its the most boring part of GSoC writing the proposal.
      • 2020-03-31 09150, 2020

      • shivam-kapila
        One of the best part of meb is that previous GSoCers are still so much interested. Boom. What a community!
      • 2020-03-31 09115, 2020

      • chaban
        reosarevok: not right now. Maybe in ca. 30min