#metabrainz

/

      • d4rkie has quit
      • 2020-06-03 15549, 2020

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2020-06-03 15550, 2020

      • v6lur_ has quit
      • 2020-06-03 15556, 2020

      • supersandro20001 has quit
      • 2020-06-03 15547, 2020

      • supersandro2000 joined the channel
      • 2020-06-03 15513, 2020

      • Gore has quit
      • 2020-06-03 15532, 2020

      • Gore joined the channel
      • 2020-06-03 15541, 2020

      • Chinmay3199 joined the channel
      • 2020-06-03 15501, 2020

      • KindOne has quit
      • 2020-06-03 15539, 2020

      • KindOne joined the channel
      • 2020-06-03 15530, 2020

      • reosarevok
        CatQuest: about what exactly? :D
      • 2020-06-03 15536, 2020

      • yvanzo
        bitmap: no, I didn’t update pgbouncer.ini but I killed a process, might have been the wrong one then. mb json dump was not active at that time though.
      • 2020-06-03 15526, 2020

      • yvanzo
        loading latest full export into test
      • 2020-06-03 15513, 2020

      • Zastai joined the channel
      • 2020-06-03 15527, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
      • 2020-06-03 15528, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        BB-483: Select which entity to merge *into*
      • 2020-06-03 15515, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Also good morning :)
      • 2020-06-03 15541, 2020

      • diru1100
        Morning !!
      • 2020-06-03 15540, 2020

      • ruaok
        moiiin
      • 2020-06-03 15518, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Mr_Monkey: hi! remind me, what was the use of picking a specific entity? Like, what difference does it make which one I pick? Just the ID I end up with?
      • 2020-06-03 15524, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        And also the data of the entity you select will be the default in the dropdowns on the merge page, if there's conflicts
      • 2020-06-03 15506, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Meaning if you know one entity's data is clean and others not so much, it's easier to just merge into the clean one than have to select the valid data in each dropdown.
      • 2020-06-03 15546, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I like the radio buttons (unsurprisingly) but I'm not sure the BBID helps much at all. I can get the ID by checking the link, anyway, and more importantly that doesn't actually help me figure out if it has better data
      • 2020-06-03 15550, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Unless I open the links
      • 2020-06-03 15500, 2020

      • reosarevok
        (and if I do open the links, then I really don't need the BBID)
      • 2020-06-03 15530, 2020

      • reosarevok
        So, if the idea is "pick the one with the best data as a starting point" I'd show some more data to allow the user to make a decision from this page
      • 2020-06-03 15559, 2020

      • reosarevok
        (and as I've said before, my alternative to "more data" is just "default to oldest entity since they can pick and choose from the fields")
      • 2020-06-03 15514, 2020

      • reosarevok
        IMO currently it's a somewhere-in-between which doesn't have the benefits of either :)
      • 2020-06-03 15527, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        It's more a convenience of "if you know of the entities that you selected you want to merge into, here's an option to do so"
      • 2020-06-03 15540, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        if you know which*
      • 2020-06-03 15547, 2020

      • reosarevok
        For an MB user migrating, more data would probably be the simplest. For a new user, just having one picked out for them would be
      • 2020-06-03 15509, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        OK. So you suggest auto-selecting a default option then?
      • 2020-06-03 15512, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Sure, I get that, but in most cases, in my MB experience at least, what I know is "I want to merge it into the one with an artist type"
      • 2020-06-03 15523, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Or "into the one with the date X"
      • 2020-06-03 15534, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Very rarely "into the one with the ID starting with b3" :)
      • 2020-06-03 15543, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Sure, I totally get that
      • 2020-06-03 15532, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Thanks for the input !
      • 2020-06-03 15534, 2020

      • reosarevok
        If you feel a choice is worth it (and it might be - I guess it depends on how many values I'd need to look through - if 3 or 4 it's probably fine, if 30 probably a huge pain)
      • 2020-06-03 15541, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Then show a bit more data to help them pick :)
      • 2020-06-03 15510, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I suspect by far the most common will be "one with only a bit of data vs one with a ton of data", in which case I guess if one has no data it'll pick the other by default?
      • 2020-06-03 15520, 2020

      • reosarevok
        And "two with very little data" in which case it's easy either way :)
      • 2020-06-03 15524, 2020

      • reosarevok
        But that's just a gut feeling
      • 2020-06-03 15543, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Oh, one quick question that I just thought of
      • 2020-06-03 15549, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Is there a way to pick "none of the above"?
      • 2020-06-03 15556, 2020

      • reosarevok
        For the data, not the entity :D
      • 2020-06-03 15514, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Say, "one says it's born 1909 and one born 1910 and I can't find a proper source for either, just don't set any"
      • 2020-06-03 15544, 2020

      • reosarevok
        (although I guess merges are instant, so it's not a big deal, right? because you could just remove it after the merge, since you don't need to wait 7 days)
      • 2020-06-03 15502, 2020

      • Gazooo has quit
      • 2020-06-03 15510, 2020

      • reosarevok
        (so if that's the case, ignore, that'd make it complex for little benefit)
      • 2020-06-03 15547, 2020

      • Gazooo joined the channel
      • 2020-06-03 15545, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        It is indeed instant, and recommended in doc and help text to edit before or after the merge.
      • 2020-06-03 15559, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        That being said,
      • 2020-06-03 15546, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        There's BB-482 for that.
      • 2020-06-03 15547, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        BB-482: Allow users to edit data when merging https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/BB-482
      • 2020-06-03 15522, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        But I'll first have to figure out how how that will affect reverting merges
      • 2020-06-03 15508, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        I feel like I could show a little bit more data in the merge queue. It's a question of how to keep it light and looking nice. I'll add a ticket for that as an improvement, as I feel it's releasable as-is, and will take a bit of fiddling around until I find the right solution.
      • 2020-06-03 15527, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        We've discussed in before having popover cards when one hovers over an entity name, with some of the entity's basic information. That would solve the issue.
      • 2020-06-03 15551, 2020

      • yvanzo
        Hi diru1100: How are you doing? Can we schedule a meeting when you have time?
      • 2020-06-03 15513, 2020

      • diru1100
        Hey yvanzo: I am fine, hope you are doing well. Yes, I am free. Kindly schedule a time slot when you are available.
      • 2020-06-03 15542, 2020

      • yvanzo
        diru1100: now? just for a short update
      • 2020-06-03 15536, 2020

      • diru1100
        yvanzo: sure
      • 2020-06-03 15538, 2020

      • yvanzo
        Is the data generation code available somewhere for review or for use?
      • 2020-06-03 15521, 2020

      • diru1100
        I have completed generating all the parameters, but I am trying to group them together and then upload it on GitHub. I can just upload the file I have now, it just won't be presentable.
      • 2020-06-03 15511, 2020

      • yvanzo
        Cool, is it something you can make presentable so that we can discuss it next time?
      • 2020-06-03 15500, 2020

      • ruaok
      • 2020-06-03 15505, 2020

      • ruaok
        pristine__: ^^
      • 2020-06-03 15513, 2020

      • diru1100
        Yes absolutely, everything is done and I will upload it by today and give you an update .
      • 2020-06-03 15539, 2020

      • ruaok
        when I looked at copying the mappings to the FTP site I took a look at how the files are being stored and it is much too complicated as it stands.
      • 2020-06-03 15503, 2020

      • ruaok
        the above method is what I am going to settle on -- can you please adapt the spark code that downloads mapping to reflect this?
      • 2020-06-03 15515, 2020

      • yvanzo
        Thanks diru1100, what time works for you today? (or tomorrow?)
      • 2020-06-03 15528, 2020

      • diru1100
        yvanzo: One thing I am thinking about is, currently I am generating each parameter seperately, and grouping them at the end. Is that the right approach to generate?
      • 2020-06-03 15557, 2020

      • diru1100
        Tomorrow anytime after 2pm IST, we can review the code
      • 2020-06-03 15526, 2020

      • yvanzo
        Ok for tomorrow 2pm IST, which is 8:30 UTC right?
      • 2020-06-03 15509, 2020

      • yvanzo
        diru1100: This approach is probably right, just keep it simple, it's only for test purpose.
      • 2020-06-03 15526, 2020

      • diru1100
        Yes
      • 2020-06-03 15500, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        Mr_Monkey, iliekcomputers, alastairp: I figured out the issue with `pushState`, the back button is now working with query parameters too
      • 2020-06-03 15517, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Hey ! Good news !
      • 2020-06-03 15537, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        I misunderstood when `popstate` event was called
      • 2020-06-03 15541, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Nicely done. For my general knowledge, what was the issue?
      • 2020-06-03 15511, 2020

      • diru1100
        Alright, I may be thinking too much. Will give you an update by tomorrow
      • 2020-06-03 15550, 2020

      • v6lur_ joined the channel
      • 2020-06-03 15551, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        I though that calling pushState triggers the event too
      • 2020-06-03 15500, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        iliekcomputers: Should I start with top recordings now?
      • 2020-06-03 15509, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        there's two things we should do first
      • 2020-06-03 15517, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        ruaok opened tickets, they should be in the epic
      • 2020-06-03 15523, 2020

      • pristine__
        ruaok: but isn't it easy to navigate to required mapping with current method?
      • 2020-06-03 15536, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        yes doing that right now
      • 2020-06-03 15540, 2020

      • ruaok
        pristine__: not really.
      • 2020-06-03 15540, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        first one: it's not obvious to users that the artists link is a dropdown
      • 2020-06-03 15550, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        and that a releases graph exists
      • 2020-06-03 15556, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        Mr_Monkey: can you help ishaanshah with that?
      • 2020-06-03 15500, 2020

      • ruaok
        first, there is a sequence/schema number we do not need. this is not a replication stream. a date is sufficient.
      • 2020-06-03 15510, 2020

      • ruaok
        then all the dumps for one date should all be in the same directory.
      • 2020-06-03 15528, 2020

      • ruaok
        right now there are far too many directories for this setup
      • 2020-06-03 15553, 2020

      • pristine__
        ruaok: at any point in time, we will have only three mapping tars (mapping, mapping-with-text, mapping-matchable) with latest changes?
      • 2020-06-03 15520, 2020

      • pristine__
        > then all the dumps for one date should all be in the same directory.
      • 2020-06-03 15522, 2020

      • pristine__
        Right
      • 2020-06-03 15523, 2020

      • ruaok
        I'd say max three sets of three. but certainly two.
      • 2020-06-03 15524, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        I can. Gotta think about it, since I'm the one who suggested the current solution :p
      • 2020-06-03 15548, 2020

      • pristine__
        Okay. I will open a PR for that.
      • 2020-06-03 15523, 2020

      • ruaok
        thanks. once I have a set of files, I'll copy it out there. should be within a few hours.
      • 2020-06-03 15541, 2020

      • pristine__
        ruaok: can you have a quick look at #896?
      • 2020-06-03 15550, 2020

      • pristine__
        Nice :)
      • 2020-06-03 15510, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        Mr_Monkey: Can we have a pill style dropdown
      • 2020-06-03 15519, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        To make it more evident
      • 2020-06-03 15539, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Not sure what tha looks like, but if it's waht I imagine yes
      • 2020-06-03 15517, 2020

      • ruaok
        let me get the dumps finished, then I'll review.
      • 2020-06-03 15517, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        I mean the instead of a transparent button, we color it orange as we had for the entity selection tabs before
      • 2020-06-03 15522, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Yeah, I think something like that could work
      • 2020-06-03 15530, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        iliekcomputers: does that sound good to you?
      • 2020-06-03 15523, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        i think that makes sense. i'd tag ruaok on the PR with a screenshot when you have it up
      • 2020-06-03 15556, 2020

      • ruaok
        for what, to make sure its orange enough??? 🤣
      • 2020-06-03 15559, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
      • 2020-06-03 15558, 2020

      • ishaanshah
      • 2020-06-03 15556, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Try the pill badges, they might work better inline in a sentence
      • 2020-06-03 15539, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        Ohhh got it
      • 2020-06-03 15558, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        for the dropdown
      • 2020-06-03 15507, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Yes
      • 2020-06-03 15516, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        Yep, that makes sense
      • 2020-06-03 15520, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        I will use that
      • 2020-06-03 15522, 2020

      • ishaanshah
      • 2020-06-03 15522, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        LB-615: Release charts: group by artist or album artist??
      • 2020-06-03 15504, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        We need to find a way to group albums having tracks from various artists
      • 2020-06-03 15527, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        for eg
      • 2020-06-03 15528, 2020

      • ishaanshah
      • 2020-06-03 15551, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        yeah, agreed
      • 2020-06-03 15503, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        This shows up 10 times on the profile because of different artists
      • 2020-06-03 15504, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        i'm not sure we have that data in spark-land
      • 2020-06-03 15510, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        Hmm
      • 2020-06-03 15516, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        let's talk about it later today
      • 2020-06-03 15523, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        yep
      • 2020-06-03 15546, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        So I will work LB-614 for now
      • 2020-06-03 15547, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        LB-614: UX improvements for user stats https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/LB-614
      • 2020-06-03 15519, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        sgtm, there's also the bug that alastairp mentioned about the flashing of the first page of graphs before the actual page gets loaded
      • 2020-06-03 15535, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        that will be fixed in the back button pr
      • 2020-06-03 15538, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        is*
      • 2020-06-03 15554, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        oh, awesome, that's great
      • 2020-06-03 15501, 2020

      • ishaanshah
      • 2020-06-03 15506, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        Hmm, this is weird
      • 2020-06-03 15514, 2020

      • ishaanshah
      • 2020-06-03 15545, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        listen_count is 0 for some 🤷
      • 2020-06-03 15558, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        huh
      • 2020-06-03 15501, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        that makes no sense
      • 2020-06-03 15529, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        All of them dont have release name present
      • 2020-06-03 15504, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        I guess we should filter them out
      • 2020-06-03 15520, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        in spark
      • 2020-06-03 15528, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        I will open a ticket
      • 2020-06-03 15552, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        oh is the release name ''?
      • 2020-06-03 15553, 2020

      • ishaanshah
        yes
      • 2020-06-03 15514, 2020

      • iliekcomputers
        Yeah, we should fix that, please open a ticket