#metabrainz

/

      • CallerNo6 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26718, 2020

      • supersandro2000 has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26741, 2020

      • supersandro2000 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26715, 2020

      • Cyna[m]1 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26731, 2020

      • Cyna[m] has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26732, 2020

      • reg[m] has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26751, 2020

      • reg[m] joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26729, 2020

      • reosarevok
        SothoTalKer_: I probably should, yes. Thanks.
      • 2020-09-23 26725, 2020

      • thomasross has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26729, 2020

      • MajorLurker joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26706, 2020

      • reosarevok
        yvanzo, bitmap: what do you think about the case in https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-11061 ? aka dseomn1 being complicated :p
      • 2020-09-23 26707, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        MBS-11061: Don't allow MusicBrainz URLs in relationships
      • 2020-09-23 26731, 2020

      • dseomn1 is now known as dseomn
      • 2020-09-23 26740, 2020

      • dseomn
        on second thought, I'm not sure it's really worth putting that much effort into this
      • 2020-09-23 26732, 2020

      • dseomn
        like, I think it's fun to do weird stuff with the database when I can claim artist intent (cataloger's intent?), but that doesn't mean y'all need to support that :)
      • 2020-09-23 26739, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I mean, it's trivial to add && (isNewLink || linkTypeChanged) to the check so that old links get grandfathered in, but I'm not sure it makes sense :p
      • 2020-09-23 26718, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Of course, the current error message doesn't make a lot of sense unless you yourself just entered the link :)
      • 2020-09-23 26755, 2020

      • dseomn goes back to doing something potentially unwise with speaker wire
      • 2020-09-23 26702, 2020

      • supersandro2000 has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26739, 2020

      • supersandro2000 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26737, 2020

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok opened pull request #1707 (master…MBS-11033): MBS-11033: Update the Apple Music logo https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2020-09-23 26738, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        MBS-11033: Update the Apple Music logo used in the sidebar https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-11033
      • 2020-09-23 26702, 2020

      • MajorLurker has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26711, 2020

      • supersandro2000 has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26732, 2020

      • supersandro2000 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26728, 2020

      • MajorLurker joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26720, 2020

      • Darkloke joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26759, 2020

      • yokel has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26731, 2020

      • yokel joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26722, 2020

      • CallerNo6 has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26756, 2020

      • CallerNo6 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26756, 2020

      • CallerNo6 has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26756, 2020

      • CallerNo6 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26727, 2020

      • BrainzGit
        [critiquebrainz] amCap1712 opened pull request #306 (master…artist-entity-support): CB-270: Added rating support for artists https://github.com/metabrainz/critiquebrainz/pull…
      • 2020-09-23 26728, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        CB-270: Add support for reviewing (or atleast rating) more entities https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/CB-270
      • 2020-09-23 26735, 2020

      • supersandro2000 has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26754, 2020

      • supersandro2000 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26721, 2020

      • MajorLurker has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26737, 2020

      • MajorLurker joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26718, 2020

      • alastairp
        _lucifer: hi, I think that this is a good list of items to finish before we release to production: https://tickets.metabrainz.org/issues/?jql=projec…
      • 2020-09-23 26722, 2020

      • alastairp
        over half of them are done already
      • 2020-09-23 26715, 2020

      • alastairp
        and many of the remaining ones look like they're very small
      • 2020-09-23 26738, 2020

      • alastairp
        I think that the PRs that are still open are listed here too: https://tickets.metabrainz.org/issues/?jql=projec…, but most of them are merged
      • 2020-09-23 26746, 2020

      • _lucifer
        Yeah, seems great! depending on how much time it takes to fix all these, I say we add the recordings as well. What do you think?
      • 2020-09-23 26713, 2020

      • _lucifer
        The feature to be able to review recordings I mean
      • 2020-09-23 26745, 2020

      • alastairp
        remember, our deadline to get a release (and try and get some momentum on the site) is the meeting after the summit, so that's only about 2-3 weeks away
      • 2020-09-23 26701, 2020

      • Gazooo794 has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26711, 2020

      • alastairp
        what do we have currently? what items can we review, and what items can we rate?
      • 2020-09-23 26724, 2020

      • _lucifer
        let me check once
      • 2020-09-23 26742, 2020

      • Gazooo794 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26751, 2020

      • _lucifer
        We can review Artist, Release Group, Event, Place, Work and Label
      • 2020-09-23 26716, 2020

      • _lucifer
        We can rate release group, label for sure
      • 2020-09-23 26718, 2020

      • _lucifer
        others i am not sure, i have only the sample dump so I do not know what event/work/place to search for and check but according to the code it seems it is possible to rate any entity. just the ui may be missing
      • 2020-09-23 26756, 2020

      • alastairp
        ok, right. because you just opened this PR to rate artists, right?
      • 2020-09-23 26740, 2020

      • alastairp
        for reviews, I believe that only releasegroups are on production, correct? and all of the others are only on beta?
      • 2020-09-23 26723, 2020

      • _lucifer
        yeah, i just checked the templates only artist rating support is missing and a pr is already opened for that
      • 2020-09-23 26736, 2020

      • alastairp
        ok, cool
      • 2020-09-23 26743, 2020

      • alastairp
        so, I think a good plan might be this:
      • 2020-09-23 26745, 2020

      • _lucifer
        only release group, event and place are in production
      • 2020-09-23 26747, 2020

      • alastairp
        1) do a release to beta today with the things that we discussed yesterday, 2) finish the items in the 'next' release that I added 3) aim for production release next friday (before the summit), 4) if we have time for recording reviews add it, but don't hold the release for that if it's not finished, 5) in the following week, promote what we have and solicit more specific feedback for improvements/next work
      • 2020-09-23 26716, 2020

      • _lucifer
        sounds great! let's do it
      • 2020-09-23 26719, 2020

      • alastairp
        there was already 1 feature request on the thread that I opened on the forum, and there are a few more things that I would like to see
      • 2020-09-23 26745, 2020

      • alastairp
        how important do you think CB-356 is?
      • 2020-09-23 26746, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        CB-356: Handle reviews with deleted entities in musicbrainz-db https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/CB-356
      • 2020-09-23 26715, 2020

      • BrainzGit
        [critiquebrainz] alastair closed pull request #272 (master…artist-entity-support): CB-270: Added rating support for artists https://github.com/metabrainz/critiquebrainz/pull…
      • 2020-09-23 26715, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        CB-270: Add support for reviewing (or atleast rating) more entities https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/CB-270
      • 2020-09-23 26700, 2020

      • _lucifer
        i think it is low priority because given the level of CB interest at present it is unlikely
      • 2020-09-23 26710, 2020

      • alastairp
        for the PRs that you reopened, can you please add a summary of what the feature is, how much has been done, and what is remaining? e.g. if it was only waiting for a new version of BU, add a comment saying that it is ready to merge
      • 2020-09-23 26722, 2020

      • _lucifer
        sure will do that
      • 2020-09-23 26740, 2020

      • _lucifer
        we should handle that case but i think it can wait after the release
      • 2020-09-23 26751, 2020

      • alastairp
        ok, understood. I agree
      • 2020-09-23 26700, 2020

      • alastairp
        perfect. let me know if you have any other questions on the remaining open tickets in the 'next' release
      • 2020-09-23 26728, 2020

      • _lucifer
        sure, thanks!
      • 2020-09-23 26750, 2020

      • _lucifer
        did you see the comment on CB-380 PR?
      • 2020-09-23 26751, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        CB-380: "Write a review" error messages don't give any context https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/CB-380
      • 2020-09-23 26708, 2020

      • _lucifer
        the InputRequired v/s DataRequired?
      • 2020-09-23 26729, 2020

      • supersandro2000 has quit
      • 2020-09-23 26759, 2020

      • supersandro2000 joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26704, 2020

      • alastairp
        I haven't looked at that PR yet
      • 2020-09-23 26745, 2020

      • _lucifer
        ok no worries. let's take that query later then. otherwise i do not have any question yet
      • 2020-09-23 26755, 2020

      • _lucifer
        i'll add the summaries to the remaining prs
      • 2020-09-23 26719, 2020

      • alastairp
        thank you
      • 2020-09-23 26708, 2020

      • BrainzGit
        [listenbrainz-server] mayhem merged pull request #1106 (master…community=post-link): add community post link to recommendation info page https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-server…
      • 2020-09-23 26715, 2020

      • v6lur joined the channel
      • 2020-09-23 26725, 2020

      • ruaok
      • 2020-09-23 26740, 2020

      • ruaok
        beta is updated. have a quick sanity check look before I push to production.
      • 2020-09-23 26725, 2020

      • pristine___
        ruaok: looks good!
      • 2020-09-23 26733, 2020

      • pristine___
        Mr_Monkey: heyo!
      • 2020-09-23 26740, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Hi !
      • 2020-09-23 26745, 2020

      • ruaok
        did you poke around making sure we broke nothing?
      • 2020-09-23 26750, 2020

      • ruaok waves at Mr_Monkey
      • 2020-09-23 26754, 2020

      • pristine___
        ruaok: Clicked on the link, redirects to the post
      • 2020-09-23 26716, 2020

      • ruaok
        right, now remember that any release has the potential to break stuff that we didn't touch.
      • 2020-09-23 26731, 2020

      • pristine___
        Right
      • 2020-09-23 26734, 2020

      • ruaok
        in theory it shouldn't. but we should at least check the core features and make sure those pages load.
      • 2020-09-23 26744, 2020

      • pristine___
        Doing
      • 2020-09-23 26755, 2020

      • ruaok
        do recent tracks load? do they look the same as the production site?
      • 2020-09-23 26716, 2020

      • ruaok
        does your listens page have the right listens on it you'd expect? compared to production?
      • 2020-09-23 26714, 2020

      • pristine___
        Everything looks good to me!
      • 2020-09-23 26725, 2020

      • ruaok
        ok, i'll proceed then.
      • 2020-09-23 26730, 2020

      • pristine___
        Mr_Monkey: when I double click on a card, I get an error `we couldn't find a matching song on any of the music service`, yet the track is being played.
      • 2020-09-23 26735, 2020

      • pristine___
        Is this expected?
      • 2020-09-23 26748, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        No
      • 2020-09-23 26720, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Could you please paste the entirety of your web page's console logs in a pastebin?
      • 2020-09-23 26747, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Does it succesfully play the track with spotify or youtube?
      • 2020-09-23 26747, 2020

      • pristine___
        It is something related to BrainzPlayer because I have seen it happen on my listen, recent listen page too
      • 2020-09-23 26749, 2020

      • pristine___
        A sec
      • 2020-09-23 26755, 2020

      • pristine___
        I closed the window :(
      • 2020-09-23 26706, 2020

      • pristine___
        Mr_Monkey: so now when I double click there is no error :( I will keep in mind to open the console before playing and I will send you the logs then. Also, if I double click on a song, it says no match and moves to the next card, but when I again double click on the previous card the song plays, is it something related to buffering, maybe
      • 2020-09-23 26732, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Possibly.
      • 2020-09-23 26705, 2020

      • ruaok
        pristine___: released.
      • 2020-09-23 26707, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        The youtube player is abit flaky. I'm fixuing it as I go, but it's detifitely possible that it misbehaves.
      • 2020-09-23 26752, 2020

      • ruaok
        iliekcomputers: I just pushed out pr 1106 -- just one link changed -- do we need to make an official release for that?
      • 2020-09-23 26723, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        pristine___: I set up the youtube player to run a manual check 1.5 seconds after trying to launch a track. That check is most likely the cause of the issue you're seeing. It's a bit of a hack to replace some missing functionality from the Youtube's player API : https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-server…
      • 2020-09-23 26723, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        If you run into the issue again, you could try setting a breakpoint (in the browser console) in that ^ method and see what's happening.
      • 2020-09-23 26728, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        To be honest, I'm not proud of the hack, but haven't found a better solution yet to make sure the player doesn't get stuck on an error and interrupts the page's playback
      • 2020-09-23 26728, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Anyway. Something for me to look at and improve. I'll try throttling my connection to see if I get similar results as you do with more buffering time
      • 2020-09-23 26740, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Thanks for reporting !
      • 2020-09-23 26725, 2020

      • pristine___
        Ah! Nice hack, I mean better than getting stuck on an error.
      • 2020-09-23 26729, 2020

      • reosarevok
        bitmap, yvanzo: opinion on MBS-15 ? Should we close and assume people are fine with closing / navigating away?
      • 2020-09-23 26729, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        MBS-15: Add some method to cancel editing https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-15
      • 2020-09-23 26733, 2020

      • pristine___
        Yup. No problem :)
      • 2020-09-23 26734, 2020

      • ruaok
        heh. that reminds me of the time that german companies wanted to build rail cars for the UK. but they had no suitable tracks that were in such poor condition to mimic the tracks in the UK. they literally had to build and then severely damage a track to replicate the conditions in the UK. 🙄
      • 2020-09-23 26713, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Ouch.
      • 2020-09-23 26724, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Re: MBS-200 - does anyone in the world still use either haudio or playdar?
      • 2020-09-23 26725, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        MBS-200: Use hAudio / Playdar-enable the site https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-200
      • 2020-09-23 26743, 2020

      • ruaok
        ha. playdar.
      • 2020-09-23 26756, 2020

      • ruaok
        BrainzPlayer is the most playdar thing out there right now, I think.
      • 2020-09-23 26736, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I didn't even know the thing back in the day
      • 2020-09-23 26756, 2020

      • reosarevok
        But the last update on their website is from 2010 and this hAudio seems to always have been a proposal or something?
      • 2020-09-23 26701, 2020

      • reosarevok
        So maybe we should wontfix that
      • 2020-09-23 26720, 2020

      • ruaok
        yeah
      • 2020-09-23 26719, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Mr_Monkey: remind me, how did you do BCE support?
      • 2020-09-23 26721, 2020

      • reosarevok
        In BB
      • 2020-09-23 26730, 2020

      • reosarevok wontfixed that other one :)
      • 2020-09-23 26729, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Also, ruaok: MBS-586 - "This should be done for NGS since this has implications on possibly creating a pay WS without rate-limiting."
      • 2020-09-23 26730, 2020

      • BrainzBot
        MBS-586: Way to identify an application using the webservice https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-586
      • 2020-09-23 26753, 2020

      • reosarevok
        well yeah, that didn't happen, but do we still need this ticket?
      • 2020-09-23 26734, 2020

      • ruaok
        naw. this is clearly on our radar for ws/3.
      • 2020-09-23 26740, 2020

      • reosarevok
        I dunno if this is superseded by a ton of ws/2.5 API key stuff or not :)
      • 2020-09-23 26701, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        reosarevok: I transform back and forth from extended ISO8601 format (±YYYYYY-MM-DD), which I also use for storing the date.
      • 2020-09-23 26709, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Ok, I'll leave it until I find a better ticket but mark as fix version ws3
      • 2020-09-23 26758, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
      • 2020-09-23 26701, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Mr_Monkey: oh, ok. Our dates are three SMALLINTS
      • 2020-09-23 26713, 2020

      • reosarevok
        So I guess the closest we could do is store the year as negative
      • 2020-09-23 26728, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        It then gets transformed into the smallints for storing in the DB
      • 2020-09-23 26732, 2020

      • Mr_Monkey
        Yep, that.
      • 2020-09-23 26714, 2020

      • ruaok
      • 2020-09-23 26748, 2020

      • reosarevok
        victims include: the MDN docs
      • 2020-09-23 26749, 2020

      • reosarevok
        Oh no.