ORG-42: Have all (main) project repositories link to blog
alastairp
Freso: a breaking change version of pymbngs could migrate to the json endpoint, add requests, and remove about 80% of the code, so definitely a good idea
"add requests" -> move to the `requests` package to make queries
_lucifer
can we do some other topic first Freso, unaviable for 10-15mins
CatQuest
THIS
rdswift
Good idea, but you might want to consider an "opt out" option for shy users who don't want thir comments made public to other than their followers.
Freso
rdswift: I think that might be counter to the "philosophy" of CB and LB.
We’re specifically and intentionally not supporting private "listens" and there’s no way to have hidden reviews (well, other than drafts) on CB.
rdswift
But is a comment the same as a review?
Mr_Monkey
I do think that there should be a clear notification that the review will be public
rdswift
(Just playing devil's advocate here...)
Mr_Monkey
I think the idea is to present those writings not as comments, but clearly as reviews
rdswift
👍
Mr_Monkey
"Give a short review of this track" rather than "Write a comment to your followers"
CatQuest
yea
Freso
I was just thinking that we’d moved/are moving away from using APIs "internally" :)
CatQuest
it might be ok to be "only show to logged in users" to prevent idk
or or, if you want to she *who* you neex to login
see*
_lucifer
i am interested in helping out on this user accounts projects
rdswift
Mr_Monkey, that does NOT look like a monkey. :-)
CatQuest
Freso: can't change licence after publishing
Freso
I’d say CC-by-sa should be a safe one, but CC-by could be a more CC0-ish choice.
Also, it should be possible to change a license to a more permissive one (but not the other way).
CatQuest
ruaok: it does say right in the choice exactly what it means , in ausefull
an usefull way*
Freso
I’d vote to drop nc as an option going forward.
It can be kept in the db for backwards compatibility, but nc is :|
CatQuest
non commercial
?
Freso
Yes
alastairp
_lucifer: we've been talking about it for 3-4 years, so maybe in another 2 years or so we'll be ready to start :)
Freso
^
CatQuest
what does that mean exactly? doesnt that mean that others cant make money of it?
Freso
Yeah.
_lucifer
alastairp: lol, i remember talks about in start of 2019 when i joined MeB community
CatQuest
my favourite is share alike give credit
alastairp
CatQuest: right. at least, not without additional permission
Freso
But it is unclear as to what extent is "make money" counts.
CatQuest
really don't want others to make money on my words/effort/work
Freso
Is it "making money" if you make a video and put it on YouTube and get ad revenue? What if you don’t, but YouTube uses your derived work to run ads and earn themselves?
Is a non-commercial company (say, MetaBrainz or WikiMedia) "making money" by asking for donations?
CatQuest
depends on the level, you, is fine, pewdiepie or youtube, no
alastairp
CB dumps are already split into nc/non-nc
Freso
"depends on the level" ← is why it doesn’t work :)
CatQuest
and that's why i use nc and don't wnat it removed
_lucifer
will do
Freso
CatQuest: "nc" is a non-free license.
killme has quit
CatQuest
i don't agree
killme joined the channel
fuck of rob
Freso
CatQuest: Please mind your manners.
rdswift
As long as the user understands, they have the option of not submitting.